VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
William St-Arnaud
dblp:294/0820
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-2762-4302ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Speech recognition and synthesis · 44% Generative modeling · 44% Optimization for machine learning · 13% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative flow networks |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning to Build Solutions in Stochastic Matching Problems Using Flows (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
stochastic matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning to Build Solutions in Stochastic Matching Problems Using Flows (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
constraint programming |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Individual Fairness in Kidney Exchange Programs · AAAI 2021 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › market design › matching markets
kidney exchange |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Individual Fairness in Kidney Exchange Programs · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
combinatorial optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Learning to Build Solutions in Stochastic Matching Problems Using Flows (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
GFlowNets · 0.8randomized policy · 0.5optimal solution enumeration · 0.5linear programming · 0.5constraint programming · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Learning to Build Solutions in Stochastic Matching Problems Using Flows (Student Abstract)abstractGenerative Flow Networks, known as GFlowNets, have been introduced in recent times, presenting an exciting possibility for neural networks to model distributions across various data structures. In this paper, we broaden their applicability to encompass scenarios where the data structures are optimal solutions of a combinatorial problem. Concretely, we propose the use of GFlowNets to learn the distribution of optimal solutions for kidney exchange problems (KEPs), a generalized form of matching problems involving cycles. William St-Arnaud, Margarida Carvalho, Golnoosh Farnadi |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2021 | Individual Fairness in Kidney Exchange ProgramsabstractKidney transplant is the preferred method of treatment for patients suffering from kidney failure. However, not all patients can find a donor which matches their physiological characteristics. Kidney exchange programs (KEPs) seek to match such incompatible patient-donor pairs together, usually with the main objective of maximizing the total number of transplants. Since selecting one optimal solution translates to a decision on who receives a transplant, it has a major effect on the lives of patients. The current practice in selecting an optimal solution does not necessarily ensure fairness in the selection process. In this paper, the existence of multiple optimal plans for a KEP is explored as a mean to achieve individual fairness. We propose the use of randomized policies for selecting an optimal solution in which patients' equal opportunity to receive a transplant is promoted. Our approach gives rise to the problem of enumerating all optimal solutions, which we tackle using a hybrid of constraint programming and linear programming. The advantages of our proposed method over the common practice of using the optimal solution obtained by a solver are stressed through computational experiments. Our methodology enables decision makers to fully control KEP outcomes, overcoming any potential bias or vulnerability intrinsic to a deterministic solver. Golnoosh Farnadi, William St-Arnaud, Behrouz Babaki, Margarida Carvalho |
AAAI | 2 |