Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

William St-Arnaud

dblp:294/0820 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-2762-4302ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Speech recognition and synthesis · 44% Generative modeling · 44% Optimization for machine learning · 13%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative flow networks
0.812024
Learning to Build Solutions in Stochastic Matching Problems Using Flows (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
stochastic matching
0.812024
Learning to Build Solutions in Stochastic Matching Problems Using Flows (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024
Mathematical optimization
constraint programming
0.512021
Individual Fairness in Kidney Exchange Programs · AAAI 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › market design › matching markets
kidney exchange
0.512021
Individual Fairness in Kidney Exchange Programs · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
combinatorial optimization
0.212024
Learning to Build Solutions in Stochastic Matching Problems Using Flows (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

GFlowNets · 0.8randomized policy · 0.5optimal solution enumeration · 0.5linear programming · 0.5constraint programming · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Learning to Build Solutions in Stochastic Matching Problems Using Flows (Student Abstract)
abstract
Generative Flow Networks, known as GFlowNets, have been introduced in recent times, presenting an exciting possibility for neural networks to model distributions across various data structures. In this paper, we broaden their applicability to encompass scenarios where the data structures are optimal solutions of a combinatorial problem. Concretely, we propose the use of GFlowNets to learn the distribution of optimal solutions for kidney exchange problems (KEPs), a generalized form of matching problems involving cycles.
William St-Arnaud, Margarida Carvalho, Golnoosh Farnadi
AAAI1
2021 Individual Fairness in Kidney Exchange Programs
abstract
Kidney transplant is the preferred method of treatment for patients suffering from kidney failure. However, not all patients can find a donor which matches their physiological characteristics. Kidney exchange programs (KEPs) seek to match such incompatible patient-donor pairs together, usually with the main objective of maximizing the total number of transplants. Since selecting one optimal solution translates to a decision on who receives a transplant, it has a major effect on the lives of patients. The current practice in selecting an optimal solution does not necessarily ensure fairness in the selection process. In this paper, the existence of multiple optimal plans for a KEP is explored as a mean to achieve individual fairness. We propose the use of randomized policies for selecting an optimal solution in which patients' equal opportunity to receive a transplant is promoted. Our approach gives rise to the problem of enumerating all optimal solutions, which we tackle using a hybrid of constraint programming and linear programming. The advantages of our proposed method over the common practice of using the optimal solution obtained by a solver are stressed through computational experiments. Our methodology enables decision makers to fully control KEP outcomes, overcoming any potential bias or vulnerability intrinsic to a deterministic solver.
Golnoosh Farnadi, William St-Arnaud, Behrouz Babaki, Margarida Carvalho
AAAI2