Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tongyao Zhu

dblp:294/1420 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Language models and text generation · 30% Question answering and dialogue systems · 14% Vision and language · 14%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
1.722025
Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas · ICML 2025
Bring Reason to Vision: Understanding Perception and Reasoning through Model Merging · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models
1.012026
How Can Synthetic Data Improve Multilingual Language Model Pretraining? A Data Quality Perspective · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › multilingual NLP › multilingual language modeling
multilingual pretraining
1.012026
How Can Synthetic Data Improve Multilingual Language Model Pretraining? A Data Quality Perspective · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training › data-centric pre-training
synthetic pre-training
1.012026
How Can Synthetic Data Improve Multilingual Language Model Pretraining? A Data Quality Perspective · ACL (1) 2026
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval
1.012026
When Does Mixing Help? Analyzing Query Embedding Interpolation in Multilingual Dense Retrieval · ACL (1) 2026
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval › dense retrieval
multilingual dense retrieval
1.012026
When Does Mixing Help? Analyzing Query Embedding Interpolation in Multilingual Dense Retrieval · ACL (1) 2026
Information retrieval
retrieval models
1.012026
When Does Mixing Help? Analyzing Query Embedding Interpolation in Multilingual Dense Retrieval · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attention analysis
0.912025
Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › efficient training
efficient pre-training
0.912025
SkyLadder: Better and Faster Pretraining via Context Window Scheduling · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model inference
inference-time decoding
0.912025
Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training › language model pretraining
large language model pretraining
0.912025
SkyLadder: Better and Faster Pretraining via Context Window Scheduling · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging
0.912025
Bring Reason to Vision: Understanding Perception and Reasoning through Model Merging · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain question answering
0.812024
Beyond Memorization: The Challenge of Random Memory Access in Language Models · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › task-oriented dialogue
dialogue state tracking
0.512021
Multi-domain Dialogue State Tracking with Recursive Inference · WWW 2021
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › task-oriented dialogue › dialogue state tracking
multi-domain dialogue state tracking
0.512021
Multi-domain Dialogue State Tracking with Recursive Inference · WWW 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › long-context language modeling › context utilization
long-context modeling
0.312025
SkyLadder: Better and Faster Pretraining via Context Window Scheduling · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

synthetic data generation · 1.0embedding interpolation · 1.0data quality filtering · 1.0short-to-long context transition · 0.9model merging · 0.9layer-wise analysis · 0.9inference-time decoding · 0.9confidence scoring · 0.9attention analysis · 0.9recitation · 0.8permutation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 How Can Synthetic Data Improve Multilingual Language Model Pretraining? A Data Quality Perspective
abstract
Tongyao Zhu, Qian Liu, Chang Ma, Jinghan Zhang, Longxu Dou, Junxian He, Shiqi Chen. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Tongyao Zhu, Qian Liu 0033, Jinghan Zhang 0006, Longxu Dou, Junxian He, Shiqi Chen 0002
ACL (1)1
2026 When Does Mixing Help? Analyzing Query Embedding Interpolation in Multilingual Dense Retrieval
abstract
While mixed-language querying is ubiquitous in multilingual communities, the sensitivity of dense retrievers to such queries remains poorly understood.We present a ratio-controlled study on mMARCO that systematically evaluates retrieval performance by varying the mixing proportion of parallel query translations via embedding-level mixing-constructing mixed queries as an interpolation of monolingual embeddings.Experiments with BGE-M3 demonstrate that an optimal mixing ratio outperforms the best monolingual endpoint in 88/105 cases.We uncover a distinct asymmetry driven by English dominance: mixing is uniformly beneficial when retrieving from non-English document indices, whereas indices containing English are best served by pure English queries.Furthermore, English acts as the strongest mixing partner for every non-English document language.Finally, when controlling for English dominance, mixing gains correlate negatively with typological distance.We conclude that language-mix sensitivity is structured and predictable, and we validate the robustness of these patterns across model families and scales. 1
Tongyao Zhu, Huang Chao Ming, Min-Yen Kan
ACL (1)1
2025 Bring Reason to Vision: Understanding Perception and Reasoning through Model Merging
abstract
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) combine visual perception with the general capabilities, such as reasoning, of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the mechanisms by which these two abilities can be combined and contribute remain poorly understood. In this work, we explore to compose perception and reasoning through model merging that connects parameters of different models. Unlike previous works that often focus on merging models of the same kind, we propose merging models across modalities, enabling the incorporation of the reasoning capabilities of LLMs into VLMs. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that model merging offers a successful pathway to transfer reasoning abilities from LLMs to VLMs in a training-free manner. Moreover, we utilize the merged models to understand the internal mechanism of perception and reasoning and how merging affects it. We find that perception capabilities are predominantly encoded in the early layers of the model, whereas reasoning is largely facilitated by the middle-to-late layers. After merging, we observe that all layers begin to contribute to reasoning, whereas the distribution of perception abilities across layers remains largely unchanged. These observations shed light on the potential of model merging as a tool for multimodal integration and interpretation.
Shiqi Chen 0002, Jinghan Zhang 0006, Tongyao Zhu, Wei Liu 0131, Siyang Gao, Miao Xiong, Manling Li, Junxian He
ICML3
2025 Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas
abstract
Large Vision Language Models (VLMs) have long struggled with spatial reasoning tasks. Surprisingly, even simple spatial reasoning tasks, such as recognizing “under” or “behind” relationships between only two objects, pose significant challenges for current VLMs. We believe it is crucial to use the lens of mechanism interpretability, opening up the model and diving into model’s internal states to examine the interactions between image and text tokens during spatial reasoning. Our analysis of attention behaviors reveals significant differences in how VLMs allocate attention to image versus text. By tracing the areas of images that receive the highest attention scores throughout intermediate layers, we observe a notable pattern: errors often coincide with attention being misdirected towards irrelevant objects within the image. Moreover, such attention patterns exhibit substantial differences between familiar (e.g., “on the left side of ”) and unfamiliar (e.g.,“in front of ”) spatial relationships. Motivated by these findings, we propose ADAPTVIS based on inference-time confidence scores to sharpen the attention on highly relevant regions when the model exhibits high confidence, while smoothing and broadening the attention window to consider a wider context when confidence is lower. This training-free decoding method shows significant improvement (e.g., up to a 50 absolute point improvement) on spatial reasoning benchmarks such as WhatsUp and VSR with negligible additional cost.
Shiqi Chen 0002, Tongyao Zhu, Ruochen Zhou, Jinghan Zhang 0006, Siyang Gao, Juan Carlos Niebles, Mor Geva, Junxian He, Jiajun Wu 0001, Manling Li
ICML2
2025 SkyLadder: Better and Faster Pretraining via Context Window Scheduling
abstract
Recent advancements in LLM pretraining have featured ever-expanding context windows to process longer sequences. However, our controlled study reveals that models pretrained with shorter context windows consistently outperform their long-context counterparts under a fixed token budget. This finding motivates us to explore an optimal context window scheduling strategy to better balance long-context capability with pretraining efficiency. To this end, we propose SkyLadder, a simple yet effective approach that implements a short-to-long context window transition. SkyLadder preserves strong standard benchmark performance, while matching or exceeding baseline results on long-context tasks. Through extensive experiments, we pretrain 1B-parameter models (up to 32K context) and 3B-parameter models (8K context) on 100B tokens, demonstrating that SkyLadder yields consistent gains of up to 3.7% on common benchmarks, while achieving up to 22% faster training speeds compared to baselines.
Tongyao Zhu, Qian Liu 0033, Shiqi Chen 0002, Xiangming Gu, Tianyu Pang, Min-Yen Kan
NeurIPS1
2024 Beyond Memorization: The Challenge of Random Memory Access in Language Models
abstract
Recent developments in Language Models (LMs) have shown their effectiveness in NLP tasks, particularly in knowledge-intensive tasks.However, the mechanisms underlying knowledge storage and memory access within their parameters remain elusive.In this paper, we investigate whether a generative LM (e.g., GPT-2) is able to access its memory sequentially or randomly.Through carefully-designed synthetic tasks, covering the scenarios of full recitation, selective recitation and grounded question answering, we reveal that LMs manage to sequentially access their memory while encountering challenges in randomly accessing memorized content.We find that techniques including recitation and permutation improve the random memory access capability of LMs.Furthermore, by applying this intervention to realistic scenarios of open-domain question answering, we validate that enhancing random access by recitation leads to notable improvements in question answering.The code to reproduce our experiments can be found at https://github. com/sail-sg/lm-random-memory-access.
Tongyao Zhu, Qian Liu 0033, Liang Pang 0001, Zhengbao Jiang, Min-Yen Kan
ACL (1)1
2021 Multi-domain Dialogue State Tracking with Recursive Inference
abstract
Multi-domain dialogue state tracking (DST) is a critical component for monitoring user goals during the course of an interaction. Existing approaches have relied on dialogue history indiscriminately or updated on the most recent turns incrementally. However, in spite of modeling it based on fixed ontology or open vocabulary, the former setting violates the interactive and progressing nature of dialogue, while the later easily gets affected by the error accumulation conundrum. Here, we propose a Recursive Inference mechanism (ReInf) to resolve DST in multi-domain scenarios that call for more robust and accurate tracking capability. Specifically, our agent reversely reviews the dialogue history until the agent has pinpointed sufficient turns confidently for slot value prediction. It also recursively factors in potential dependencies among domains and slots to further solve the co-reference and value sharing problems. The quantitative and qualitative experimental results on the MultiWOZ 2.1 corpus demonstrate that the proposed ReInf not only outperforms the state-of-the-art methods, but also achieves reasonable turn reference and interpretable slot co-reference.
Lizi Liao, Tongyao Zhu, Le Hong Long, Tat-Seng Chua
WWW2