An important goal of modern scheduling systems is to efficiently manage power usage. In energy-efficient scheduling, the operating system controls the speed at which a machine is processing jobs with the dual objective of minimizing energy consumption and optimizing the quality of service cost of the resulting schedule. Since machine-learned predictions about future requests can often be learned from historical data, a recent line of work on learning-augmented algorithms aims to achieve improved performance guarantees by leveraging predictions. In particular, for energy-efficient scheduling, Bamas et. al. [NeurIPS '20] and Antoniadis et. al. [SWAT '22] designed algorithms with predictions for the energy minimization with deadlines problem and achieved an improved competitive ratio when the prediction error is small while also maintaining worst-case bounds even when the prediction error is arbitrarily large. In this paper, we consider a general setting for energy-efficient scheduling and provide a flexible learning-augmented algorithmic framework that takes as input an offline and an online algorithm for the desired energy-efficient scheduling problem. We show that, when the prediction error is small, this framework gives improved competitive ratios for many different energy-efficient scheduling problems, including energy minimization with deadlines, while also maintaining a bounded competitive ratio regardless of the prediction error. Finally, we empirically demonstrate that this framework achieves an improved performance on real and synthetic datasets.

In the online minimum cost matching problem, there are n servers and, at each of n time steps, a request arrives and must be irrevocably matched to a server that has not yet been matched, with the goal of minimizing the sum of the distances between the matched pairs. Online minimum cost matching is a central problem in applications such as ride-hailing platforms and food delivery services. Despite achieving a worst-case competitive ratio that is exponential in n even on the line, the simple greedy algorithm, which matches each request to its nearest available server, performs well in practice and has a number of attractive features such as strategyproofness. A major question is thus to explain greedy's strong empirical performance. In this paper, we aim to understand the performance of greedy on the line over instances that are at least partially random.

We consider dynamic multi-product pricing and assortment problems under an unknown demand over T periods, where in each period, the seller decides on the price for each product or the assortment of products to offer to a customer who chooses according to an unknown Multinomial Logit Model (MNL). Such problems arise in many applications, including online retail and advertising. We propose a randomized dynamic pricing policy based on a variant of the Online Newton Step algorithm (ONS) that achieves a $O(d\sqrt{T}\log(T))$ regret guarantee under an adversarial arrival model. We also present a new optimistic algorithm for the adversarial MNL contextual bandits problem, which achieves a better dependency than the state-of-the-art algorithms in a problem-dependent constant $\kappa$ (potentially exponentially small). Our regret upper bound scales as $\tilde{O}(d\sqrt{\kappa T}+ \log(T)/\kappa)$, which gives a stronger bound than the existing $\tilde{O}(d\sqrt{T}/\kappa)$ guarantees.

In this paper, we study a dynamic assortment optimization problem under bandit feedback, where a seller with a fixed initial inventory of N substitutable products faces a sequence of i.i.d. customer arrivals (with an unknown distribution) over a time horizon of T periods, and needs to decide in each period on an assortment of products to offer to the customer to maximize the total expected revenue. Such a problem arises in many applications including online retail and recommendations. The seller has initially no (or only limited) information about the customer's preferences and needs to learn them through repeated interaction with the i.i.d. customers. Specifically, in each period, the seller offers an assortment to the customer; the customer makes a choice from the assortment according to the unknown preferences or choice model, and the seller only observes the eventual choice from the given assortment and needs to update the estimate and future actions under this bandit feedback. Therefore, this problem exemplifies the classical trade-off between exploitation and exploration: the seller needs to simultaneously gain information about the customer's preferences and offer revenue-maximizing assortments, while respecting the resource constraints.