Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Meena Guptha
dblp:294/1566
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational finance and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
document processing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | AI Driven Accounts Payable Transformation · AAAI 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Tool for Automated Tax Coding of Invoices · AAAI 2021 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | AI Driven Accounts Payable TransformationabstractAccounts Payable (AP) is a resource-intensive business process in large enterprises for paying vendors within contractual payment deadlines for goods and services procured from them. There are multiple verifications before payment to the supplier/vendor. After the validations, the invoice flows through several steps such as vendor identification, line-item matching for Purchase order (PO) based invoices, Accounting Code identification for Non- Purchase order (Non-PO) based invoices, tax code identification, etc. Currently, each of these steps is mostly manual and cumbersome making it labor-intensive, error-prone, and requiring constant training of agents. Automatically processing these invoices for payment without any manual intervention is quite difficult. To tackle this challenge, we have developed an automated end-to-end invoice processing system using AI-based modules for multiple steps of the invoice processing pipeline. It can be configured to an individual client’s requirements with minimal effort. Currently, the system is deployed in production for two clients. It has successfully processed around ~80k invoices out of which 76% invoices were processed with low or no manual intervention. Tarun Tater, Neelamadhav Gantayat, Sampath Dechu, Hussain Jagirdar, Harshit Rawat, Meena Guptha, Lukasz Strak, Shashi Kiran, Sivakumar Narayanan |
AAAI | 6 |
| 2021 | Tool for Automated Tax Coding of InvoicesabstractAccounts payable refer to the practice where organizations procure goods and services on credit which need to be reimbursed to the vendors in due time. Once the vendor raises an invoice, it undergoes through a complex process before the final payment. In this process, tax code determination is one of the most challenging steps, which determines the tax to be levied and directly influences the amount payable to a vendor. This step is also very important from a regulatory compliance standpoint. However, it is error-prone, labor (resource) intensive, and needs regular training of the resources as it is done manually. Further, an error in the tax code determination induces penalties on the organization. Automatically arriving at a tax-code for a given product accurately and efficiently is a daunting task. To address this problem, we present an automated end-to-end system for tax code determination which can either be used as a standalone application or can be integrated into an existing invoice processing workflow. The proposed system determines the most relevant tax code for an invoice using attributes such as item description, vendor details, shipping and delivery location. The system has been deployed in production for a multinational consumer goods company for more than 6 months. It has already processed more than 22k items with an accuracy of more than 94% and high confidence prediction accuracy of around 99.54%. Using this system, approximately 73% of all the invoices require no human intervention. Tarun Tater, Sampath Dechu, Neelamadhav Gantayat, Meena Guptha, Sivakumar Narayanan |
AAAI | 4 |