Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Noah Marshall
dblp:294/4555
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 44% Deep learning architectures and training · 22% Face, body and person analysis · 15% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
optimization dynamics |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Exact risk curves of signSGD in High-Dimensions: quantifying preconditioning and noise-compression effects · ICML 2025 To Clip or not to Clip: the Dynamics of SGD with Gradient Clipping in High-Dimensions · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient clipping |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | To Clip or not to Clip: the Dynamics of SGD with Gradient Clipping in High-Dimensions · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
high-dimensional analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | To Clip or not to Clip: the Dynamics of SGD with Gradient Clipping in High-Dimensions · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic gradient descent
signSGD |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exact risk curves of signSGD in High-Dimensions: quantifying preconditioning and noise-compression effects · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | To Clip or not to Clip: the Dynamics of SGD with Gradient Clipping in High-Dimensions · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exact risk curves of signSGD in High-Dimensions: quantifying preconditioning and noise-compression effects · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | FairCal: Fairness Calibration for Face Verification · ICLR 2022 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face recognition
face verification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | FairCal: Fairness Calibration for Face Verification · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | FairCal: Fairness Calibration for Face Verification · ICLR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic gradient descent · 0.9stochastic differential equation · 0.9ordinary differential equation · 0.9gradient clipping · 0.9calibration · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | To Clip or not to Clip: the Dynamics of SGD with Gradient Clipping in High-DimensionsabstractThe success of modern machine learning is due in part to the adaptive optimization methods that have been developed to deal with the difficulties of training large models over complex datasets. One such method is gradient clipping: a practical procedure with limited theoretical underpinnings. In this work, we study clipping in a least squares problem under streaming SGD. We develop a theoretical analysis of the learning dynamics in the limit of large intrinsic dimension—a model and dataset dependent notion of dimensionality. In this limit we find a deterministic equation that describes the evolution of the loss and demonstrate that this equation predicts the path of clipped SGD on synthetic, CIFAR10, and Wikitext2 data. We show that with Gaussian noise clipping cannot improve SGD performance. Yet, in other noisy settings, clipping can provide benefits with tuning of the clipping threshold. We propose a simple heuristic for near optimal scheduling of the clipping threshold which requires the tuning of only one hyperparameter. We conclude with a discussion about the links between high-dimensional clipping and neural network training. Noah Marshall, Ke Liang Xiao, Atish Agarwala, Elliot Paquette |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Exact risk curves of signSGD in High-Dimensions: quantifying preconditioning and noise-compression effectsabstractIn recent years, SignSGD has garnered interest as both a practical optimizer as well as a simple model to understand adaptive optimizers like Adam. Though there is a general consensus that SignSGD acts to precondition optimization and reshapes noise, quantitatively understanding these effects in theoretically solvable settings remains difficult. We present an analysis of SignSGD in a high dimensional limit, and derive a limiting SDE and ODE to describe the risk. Using this framework we quantify four effects of SignSGD: effective learning rate, noise compression, diagonal preconditioning, and gradient noise reshaping. Our analysis is consistent with experimental observations but moves beyond that by quantifying the dependence of these effects on the data and noise distributions. We conclude with a conjecture on how these results might be extended to Adam. Ke Liang Xiao, Noah Marshall, Atish Agarwala, Elliot Paquette |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | FairCal: Fairness Calibration for Face Verification
Tiago Salvador, Stephanie Cairns, Vikram Voleti, Noah Marshall, Adam M. Oberman |
ICLR | 4 |