Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anming Gu

dblp:294/4808 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 35% Learning theory · 23% Deep learning architectures and training · 12%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
1.012026
Functional Stochastic Localization · COLT 2026
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms
sampling
1.012026
Functional Stochastic Localization · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.912025
Compute-Optimal LLMs Provably Generalize Better with Scale · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › continuous-time model › stochastic differential equations
latent stochastic differential equation
0.912025
Partially Observed Trajectory Inference using Optimal Transport and a Dynamics Prior · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.912025
Partially Observed Trajectory Inference using Optimal Transport and a Dynamics Prior · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › concentration inequalities
martingale inequalities
0.912025
Compute-Optimal LLMs Provably Generalize Better with Scale · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport
0.912025
Partially Observed Trajectory Inference using Optimal Transport and a Dynamics Prior · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws
0.912025
Compute-Optimal LLMs Provably Generalize Better with Scale · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
schrödinger bridge
0.912025
Partially Observed Trajectory Inference using Optimal Transport and a Dynamics Prior · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
trajectory inference
0.912025
Partially Observed Trajectory Inference using Optimal Transport and a Dynamics Prior · ICLR 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization
probabilistic localization
0.312026
Functional Stochastic Localization · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
quantization
0.312025
Compute-Optimal LLMs Provably Generalize Better with Scale · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic localization · 2.0mirror descent · 2.0log-laplace transform · 2.0functional poincaré inequality · 2.0state space model · 0.9scaling laws · 0.9optimal transport · 0.9mean-field langevin algorithm · 0.9freedman-type martingale concentration · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Functional Stochastic Localization
abstract
Eldan’s stochastic localization is a probabilistic construction that has proved instrumental to modern breakthroughs in high-dimensional geometry and the design of sampling algorithms. Motivated by sampling under non-Euclidean geometries and the mirror descent algorithm in optimization, we develop a functional generalization of Eldan’s process that replaces Gaussian regularization with regularization by any positive integer multiple of a log-Laplace transform. We further give a mixing time bound on the Markov chain induced by our localization process, which holds if our target distribution satisfies a functional Poincaré inequality. Finally, we apply our framework to differentially private convex optimization in $\ell_p$ norms for $p \in [1, 2)$, where we improve state-of-the-art query complexities in a zeroth-order model.
Anming Gu, Bobby Shi, Kevin Tian
COLT1
2025 Compute-Optimal LLMs Provably Generalize Better with Scale
abstract
Why do larger language models generalize better? To explore this question, we develop generalization bounds on the pretraining objective of large language models (LLMs) in the compute-optimal regime, as described by the Chinchilla scaling laws. We introduce a novel, fully empirical Freedman-type martingale concentration inequality that tightens existing bounds by accounting for the variance of the loss function. The generalization bound can be broken into three contributions: the number of parameters per token, the loss variance, and the quantization error at a fixed bitrate. As language models are scaled up, the number of parameters per data point stays constant; however, both the loss variance and the quantization error decrease, implying that larger models should have \emph{smaller} generalization gaps. We examine why larger models tend to be more quantizable from an information theoretic perspective, showing that the rate at which they can integrate new information grows slower than their capacity on the compute optimal frontier. From these findings we produce a scaling law for the generalization gap, showing that our bounds decrease in a predictable way.
Marc Finzi, Sanyam Kapoor, Diego Granziol, Anming Gu, Christopher De Sa, J. Zico Kolter, Andrew Gordon Wilson
ICLR4
2025 Partially Observed Trajectory Inference using Optimal Transport and a Dynamics Prior
abstract
Trajectory inference seeks to recover the temporal dynamics of a population from snapshots of its (uncoupled) temporal marginals, i.e. where observed particles are \emph{not} tracked over time. Prior works addressed this challenging problem under a stochastic differential equation (SDE) model with a gradient-driven drift in the observed space, introducing a minimum entropy estimator relative to the Wiener measure and a practical grid-free mean-field Langevin (MFL) algorithm using Schr\"odinger bridges. Motivated by the success of observable state space models in the traditional paired trajectory inference problem (e.g. target tracking), we extend the above framework to a class of latent SDEs in the form of \emph{observable state space models}. In this setting, we use partial observations to infer trajectories in the latent space under a specified dynamics model (e.g. the constant velocity/acceleration models from target tracking). We introduce the PO-MFL algorithm to solve this latent trajectory inference problem and provide theoretical guarantees to the partially observed setting. Experiments validate the robustness of our method and the exponential convergence of the MFL dynamics, and demonstrate significant outperformance over the latent-free baseline in key scenarios.
Anming Gu, Edward Chien, Kristjan Greenewald
ICLR1