Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lukang Sun

dblp:294/4996 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 60% Optimization for machine learning · 20% Learning theory · 20%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis
0.612022
A Convergence Theory for SVGD in the Population Limit under Talagrand's Inequality T1 · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling
0.612022
A Convergence Theory for SVGD in the Population Limit under Talagrand's Inequality T1 · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › particle-based variational inference
stein variational gradient descent
0.612022
A Convergence Theory for SVGD in the Population Limit under Talagrand's Inequality T1 · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.612022
A Convergence Theory for SVGD in the Population Limit under Talagrand's Inequality T1 · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

talagrand's inequality · 0.6kernelized stein discrepancy · 0.6gradient descent over probability measures · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Convergence of Stein Variational Gradient Descent under a Weaker Smoothness Condition
abstract
Stein Variational Gradient Descent (SVGD) is an important alternative to the Langevin-type algorithms for sampling from probability distributions of the form $\pi(x) \propto \exp(-V(x))$. In the existing theory of Langevin-type algorithms and SVGD, the potential function $V$ is often assumed to be $L$-smooth. However, this restrictive condition excludes a large class of potential functions such as polynomials of degree greater than $2$. Our paper studies the convergence of the SVGD algorithm for distributions with $(L_0,L_1)$-smooth potentials. This relaxed smoothness assumption was introduced by Zhang et al. [2019a] for the analysis of gradient clipping algorithms. With the help of trajectory-independent auxiliary conditions, we provide a descent lemma establishing that the algorithm decreases the KL divergence at each iteration and prove a complexity bound for SVGD in the population limit in terms of the Stein Fisher information.
Lukang Sun, Avetik G. Karagulyan, Peter Richtárik
AISTATS1
2022 A Convergence Theory for SVGD in the Population Limit under Talagrand's Inequality T1
abstract
Stein Variational Gradient Descent (SVGD) is an algorithm for sampling from a target density which is known up to a multiplicative constant. Although SVGD is a popular algorithm in practice, its theoretical study is limited to a few recent works. We study the convergence of SVGD in the population limit, (i.e., with an infinite number of particles) to sample from a non-logconcave target distribution satisfying Talagrand’s inequality T1. We first establish the convergence of the algorithm. Then, we establish a dimension-dependent complexity bound in terms of the Kernelized Stein Discrepancy (KSD). Unlike existing works, we do not assume that the KSD is bounded along the trajectory of the algorithm. Our approach relies on interpreting SVGD as a gradient descent over a space of probability measures.
Adil Salim, Lukang Sun, Peter Richtárik
ICML2