VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
George Orfanides
dblp:294/7420
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% Speech recognition and synthesis · 50% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
difference of convex programming |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular Minimization · ICML 2025 Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
difference of submodular minimization |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular Minimization · ICML 2025 Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular Minimization · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
submodular function minimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
DC algorithm · 2.2convex-concave procedure · 1.3discretization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular MinimizationabstractSubmodular functions, defined on continuous or discrete domains, arise in numerous applications. We study the minimization of the difference of submodular (DS) functions, over both domains, extending prior work restricted to set functions. We show that all functions on discrete domains and all smooth functions on continuous domains are DS. For discrete domains, we observe that DS minimization is equivalent to minimizing the difference of two convex (DC) functions, as in the set function case. We propose a novel variant of the DC Algorithm (DCA) and apply it to the resulting DC Program, obtaining comparable theoretical guarantees as in the set function case. The algorithm can be applied to continuous domains via discretization. Experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms baselines in integer compressive sensing and integer least squares. George Orfanides, Tim Hoheisel, Marwa El Halabi |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Difference of submodular minimization via DC programmingabstractMinimizing the difference of two submodular (DS) functions is a problem that naturally occurs in various machine learning problems. Although it is well known that a DS problem can be equivalently formulated as the minimization of the difference of two convex (DC) functions, existing algorithms do not fully exploit this connection. A classical algorithm for DC problems is called the DC algorithm (DCA). We introduce variants of DCA and its complete form (CDCA) that we apply to the DC program corresponding to DS minimization. We extend existing convergence properties of DCA, and connect them to convergence properties on the DS problem. Our results on DCA match the theoretical guarantees satisfied by existing DS algorithms, while providing a more complete characterization of convergence properties. In the case of CDCA, we obtain a stronger local minimality guarantee. Our numerical results show that our proposed algorithms outperform existing baselines on two applications: speech corpus selection and feature selection. Marwa El Halabi, George Orfanides, Tim Hoheisel |
ICML | 2 |