Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adrian Hänni
dblp:295/7146
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | VADETIS: An Explainable Evaluator for Anomaly Detection Techniques · ICDE 2021 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
time series anomaly detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | VADETIS: An Explainable Evaluator for Anomaly Detection Techniques · ICDE 2021 |
Data mining › model selection
parameter tuning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | VADETIS: An Explainable Evaluator for Anomaly Detection Techniques · ICDE 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
explainability analysis · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | VADETIS: An Explainable Evaluator for Anomaly Detection TechniquesabstractAnomaly detection is a fundamental problem that consists of identifying irregular patterns that do not conform to the expected behavior of a system or the generated data. Many anomaly detection techniques have been proposed for time series data. However, selecting the most suitable detection method remains challenging as the proposed techniques widely vary in performance. The appropriate choice of a detection method impacts many properties of mission-critical applications such as in monitoring a patient's health, where anomalies are inevitable but need to be detected securely. In this demo, we present a new evaluator that allows to peruse the performance of several anomaly detection techniques and supports practitioners in understanding the behavior and (dis-)advantages of each technique for a given dataset. In a simple and well-structured way, practitioners can specify the desired anomaly detection setup, and our system would tune the parameters of each technique and analyze their properties in an easily understandable report. The tool also allows recommending the most appropriate technique for each anomaly type and evaluation metric. Abdelouahab Khelifati, Mourad Khayati, Philippe Cudré-Mauroux, Adrian Hänni, Manfred Hauswirth |
ICDE | 4 |