Natural language information needs over symbolic music scores rarely reduce to a single-step lookup. Many queries require compositional Music Information Retrieval (MIR) that extracts multiple pieces of evidence from structured notation and aggregates them to answer the question. This setting remains challenging for Large Language Models due to the mismatch between natural language intents and symbolic representations, as well as the difficulty of reliably handling long structured contexts. Existing benchmarks only partially capture these retrieval demands, often emphasizing isolated theoretical knowledge or simplified settings. We introduce CSyMR-Bench, a benchmark for compositional MIR in symbolic music reasoning grounded in authentic user scenarios. It contains 126 multiple-choice questions curated from community discussions and professional examinations, where each item requires chaining multiple atomic analyses over a score to derive implicit musical evidence. To support diagnosis, we provide a taxonomy with six query intent categories and six analytical dimension tags. We further propose a tool-augmented retrieval and reasoning framework, CSyMR-Agent, that integrates a ReAct-style controller with deterministic symbolic analysis operators built with music21. Experiments across prompting baselines and agent variants show that tool-grounded compositional retrieval consistently outperforms Large Language Model-only approaches, yielding 5-7% absolute accuracy gains, with the largest improvements on analysis-heavy categories.

Visualization recommendation aims to enable rapid visual analysis of massive datasets. In real-world scenarios, it is essential to quickly gather and comprehend user preferences to cover users from diverse backgrounds, including varying skill levels and analytical tasks. Previous approaches to personalized visualization recommendations are non-interactive and rely on initial user data for new users. As a result, these models cannot effectively explore options or adapt to real-time feedback. To address this limitation, we propose an interactive personalized visualization recommendation (PVisRec) system that learns on user feedback from previous interactions. For more interactive and accurate recommendations, we propose Hier-SUCB, a contextual combinatorial semi-bandit in the PVisRec setting. Theoretically, we show an improved overall regret bound with the same rank of time but an improved rank of action space. We further demonstrate the effectiveness of Hier-SUCB through extensive experiments where it is comparable to offline methods and outperforms other bandit algorithms in the setting of visualization recommendation.

The long-tail recommendation is a challenging task for traditional recommender systems, due to data sparsity and data imbalance issues. The recent development of large language models (LLMs) has shown their abilities in complex reasoning, which can help to deduce users' preferences based on very few previous interactions. However, since most LLM-based systems rely on items' semantic meaning as the sole evidence for reasoning, the collaborative information of user-item interactions is neglected, which can cause the LLM's reasoning to be misaligned with task-specific collaborative information of the dataset. To further align LLMs' reasoning to task-specific user-item interaction knowledge, we introduce collaborative retrieval-augmented LLMs, CoRAL, which directly incorporate collaborative evidence into the prompts. Based on the retrieved user-item interactions, the LLM can analyze shared and distinct preferences among users, and summarize the patterns indicating which types of users would be attracted by certain items. The retrieved collaborative evidence prompts the LLM to align its reasoning with the user-item interaction patterns in the dataset. However, since the capacity of the input prompt is limited, finding the minimally-sufficient collaborative information for recommendation tasks can be challenging. We propose to find the optimal interaction set through a sequential decision-making process and develop a retrieval policy learned through a reinforcement learning (RL) framework, CoRAL. Our experimental results show that CoRAL can significantly improve LLMs' reasoning abilities on specific recommendation tasks. Our analysis also reveals that CoRAL can more efficiently explore collaborative information through reinforcement learning.

Conversational recommender systems (CRS) should understand users’ expressed interests, which are frequently semantically rich and knowledge-intensive. Prior works attempt to address this challenge by using external knowledge bases or parametric knowledge in large language models (LLMs). In this paper, we study a complementary solution, exploiting item knowledge in the training data. We hypothesize that many inference-time user requests can be answered by reusing popular crowd-written answers associated with similar training queries. Following this intuition, we define a class of neighborhood-based CRS that makes recommendations by identifying items commonly associated with similar training dialogue contexts. Experiments on Inspired, Redial, and Reddit-Movie benchmarks show our method outperforms state-of-the-art LLMs with 2 billion parameters, and offers on-par performance to 7 billion parameter models while using over 170 times less GPU memory. We also show neighborhood and model-based predictions can be combined to achieve further performance improvements1.

In recent years, the field of recommendation systems has witnessed significant advancements, with explainable recommendation systems gaining prominence as a crucial area of research. These systems aim to enhance user experience by providing transparent and compelling recommendations, accompanied by explanations. However, a persistent challenge lies in addressing biases that can influence the recommendations and explanations offered by these systems. Such biases often stem from a tendency to favor popular items and generate explanations that highlight their common attributes, thereby deviating from the objective of delivering personalized recommendations and explanations. While existing debiasing methods have been applied in explainable recommendation systems, they often overlook the model-generated explanations in tackling biases. Consequently, biases in model-generated explanations may persist, potentially compromising system performance and user satisfaction.

Recent conversational recommender systems (CRSs) have achieved considerable success on addressing the cold-start problem. While they utilize conversational key-terms to efficiently elicit user preferences, most of them, however, neglect that key-terms can also introduce biases. Systems learning key-term-level user preferences may make a biased item recommendation based on an overrated key-term instead of the item itself. As key-term conversation is a crucial part of CRSs, it is important to properly handle such bias resulting from the item-key-term relationship. While many debiasing methods have been proposed for traditional recommender systems, most of them focus on items or item groups re-ranking or re-weighting strategies such as calibration and propensity score, which are not designed to model the relation between item and key-term user preference. There is also no effective way for traditional debiasing methods to measure potentially useful biases through conversational key-terms to enhance the recommendation performance.

Interactive recommender systems (IRS) have received wide attention in recent years. To capture users' dynamic preferences and maximize their long-term engagement, IRS are usually formulated as reinforcement learning (RL) problems. Despite the promise to solve complex decision-making problems, RL-based methods generally require a large amount of online interaction, restricting their applications due to economic considerations. One possible direction to alleviate this issue is cross-domain recommendation that aims to leverage abundant logged interaction data from a source domain (e.g., adventure genre in movie recommendation) to improve the recommendation quality in the target domain (e.g., crime genre). Nevertheless, prior studies mostly focus on adapting the static representations of users/items. Few have explored how the temporally dynamic user-item interaction patterns transform across domains.

Conversational recommender systems elicit user preference via interactive conversational interactions. By introducing conversational key-terms, existing conversational recommenders can effectively reduce the need for extensive exploration in a traditional interactive recommender. However, there are still limitations of existing conversational recommender approaches eliciting user preference via key-terms. First, the key-term data of the items needs to be carefully labeled, which requires a lot of human efforts. Second, the number of the human labeled key-terms is limited and the granularity of the key-terms is fixed, while the elicited user preference is usually from coarse-grained to fine-grained during the conversations. In this paper, we propose a clustering of conversational bandits algorithm. To avoid the human labeling efforts and automatically learn the key-terms with the proper granularity, we online cluster the items and generate meaningful key-terms for the items during the conversational interactions. Our algorithm is general and can also be used in the user clustering when the feedback from multiple users is available, which further leads to more accurate learning and generations of conversational key-terms. We analyze the regret bound of our learning algorithm. In the empirical evaluations, without using any human labeled key-terms, our algorithm effectively generates meaningful coarse-to-fine grained key-terms and performs as well as or better than the state-of-the-art baseline.