Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vasista Ayyagari

dblp:295/8619 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 38% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 38% Robot manipulation · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
dynamic planning
0.512021
No-frills Dynamic Planning using Static Planners · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.512021
No-frills Dynamic Planning using Static Planners · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot manipulator
robot arm
0.112021
No-frills Dynamic Planning using Static Planners · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Autonomous driving
trajectory prediction
0.112021
No-frills Dynamic Planning using Static Planners · ICRA 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trajectory forecasting network · 0.5time-of-arrival prediction · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 No-frills Dynamic Planning using Static Planners
abstract
In this paper, we address the task of interacting with dynamic environments where the changes in the environment are independent of the agent. We study this through the context of trapping a moving ball with a UR5 robotic arm. Our key contribution is an approach to utilize a static planner for dynamic tasks using a Dynamic Planning add-on; that is, if we can successfully solve a task with a static target, then our approach can solve the same task when the target is moving. Our approach has three key components: an off-the-shelf static planner, a trajectory forecasting network, and a network to predict robot’s estimated time of arrival at any location. We demonstrate the generalization of our approach across environments. More information and videos at https://mlevy2525.github.io/DynamicAddOn/.
Mara Levy, Vasista Ayyagari, Abhinav Shrivastava
ICRA2