Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chilankamol Sunny

dblp:296/0521 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-3826-3810ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 87% Electronic design automation · 13%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization
instruction scheduling
0.812024
CREPE: Concurrent Reverse-Modulo-Scheduling and Placement for CGRAs · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2024
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
coarse-grained reconfigurable architecture
0.812024
CREPE: Concurrent Reverse-Modulo-Scheduling and Placement for CGRAs · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2024
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
modulo scheduling
0.812024
CREPE: Concurrent Reverse-Modulo-Scheduling and Placement for CGRAs · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2024
Electronic design automation › physical design
placement
0.212024
CREPE: Concurrent Reverse-Modulo-Scheduling and Placement for CGRAs · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reverse modulo scheduling · 1.5dynamic graph transformation · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 CREPE: Concurrent Reverse-Modulo-Scheduling and Placement for CGRAs
abstract
Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Array (CGRA) architectures are popular as high-performance and energy-efficient computing devices. Compute-intensive loop constructs of complex applications are mapped onto CGRAs by modulo-scheduling the innermost loop dataflow graph (DFG). In the state-of-the-art approaches, mapping quality is typically determined by initiation interval (II), whileschedule lengthfor one iteration is neglected. However, for nested loops,schedule lengthbecomes important. In this article, we propose CREPE, aConcurrentReverse-modulo-scheduling andPlacement technique for CGRAs that minimizes bothIIandschedule length. CREPE performs simultaneous modulo-scheduling and placement coupled with dynamic graph transformations, generating good-quality mappings with high success rates. Furthermore, we introduce a compilation flow that maps nested loops onto the CGRA and modulo-schedules the innermost loop using CREPE. Experiments show that the proposed solution outperforms the conventional approaches in mapping success rate and total execution time with no impact on the compilation time. CREPE maps all kernels considered while state-of-the-art techniques Crimson and Epimap failed to find a mapping or mapped at very highIIs. On a 2×4 CGRA, CREPE reports a 100% success rate and a speed-up up to 5.9× and 1.4× over Crimson with 78.5% and Epimap with 46.4% success rates respectively.
Chilankamol Sunny, Satyajit Das, Kevin J. M. Martin, Philippe Coussy
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.1
2023 Refined PSO Clustering for Not Well-Separated Data
abstract
Cluster analysis is the most popular and often the foremost task in big data analytics as it helps in unearthing hidden patterns and trends in data. Traditional single-objective clustering techniques often suffer from accuracy fluctuations especially when applied over data groups of varying densities and imbalanced distribution as well as in the presence of outliers. This paper presents a multi-phase clustering solution that achieves good accuracy measures even in the case of noisy and not- well-separated data (linearly not separable data). The proposed design combines a two-stage Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO) clustering with K-means logic and a state-of-the-art outlier removal technique. The use of two different optimisation criteria in the two stages of PSO clustering equips the model with the ability to escape local minima traps in the process of convergence. Extensive experiments featuring a wide variety of data have been carried out and the system could achieve accuracy levels as high as 99.9% and an average of 87.4% on notwell-separated data. The model has also been proved to be robust on eight out of the ten datasets of the Fundamental Clustering Problem Suit (FCPS), a benchmark for clustering algorithms.
Chilankamol Sunny, Shibu Kumar K. B
J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell.1