Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Junwen Yao
dblp:296/0619
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 46% Deep learning architectures and training · 28% Representation and self-supervised learning · 18% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
functional data analysis |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | SAND: Smooth imputation of sparse and noisy functional data with Transformer networks · NeurIPS 2024 Deep Learning for Functional Data Analysis with Adaptive Basis Layers · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SAND: Smooth imputation of sparse and noisy functional data with Transformer networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deep Learning for Functional Data Analysis with Adaptive Basis Layers · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
kernel regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | SAND: Smooth imputation of sparse and noisy functional data with Transformer networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 0.8self-attention on derivatives · 0.8kernel smoothing · 0.8PACE · 0.8micro neural network · 0.5basis layer · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | SAND: Smooth imputation of sparse and noisy functional data with Transformer networksabstractAlthough the transformer architecture has come to dominate other models for text and image data, its application to irregularly-spaced longitudinal data has been limited. We introduce a variant of the transformer that enables it to more smoothly impute such functional data. We augment the vanilla transformer with a simple module we call SAND (self-attention on derivatives), which naturally encourages smoothness by modeling the sub-derivative of the imputed curve. On the theoretical front, we prove the number of hidden nodes required by a network with SAND to achieve an $\epsilon$ prediction error bound for functional imputation. Extensive experiments over various types of functional data demonstrate that transformers with SAND produce better imputations than both their standard counterparts as well as transformers augmented with alternative approaches to encode the inductive bias of smoothness. SAND also outperforms standard statistical methods for functional imputation like kernel smoothing and PACE. Ju-Sheng Hong, Junwen Yao, Jonas Mueller 0001, Jane-Ling Wang |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Error Estimation for Random Fourier FeaturesabstractRandom Fourier Features (RFF) is among the most popular and broadly applicable approaches for scaling up kernel methods. In essence, RFF allows the user to avoid costly computations with a large kernel matrix via a fast randomized approximation. However, a pervasive difficulty in applying RFF is that the user does not know the actual error of the approximation, or how this error will propagate into downstream learning tasks. Up to now, the RFF literature has primarily dealt with these uncertainties using theoretical error bounds, but from a user’s standpoint, such results are typically impractical—either because they are highly conservative or involve unknown quantities. To tackle these general issues in a data-driven way, this paper develops a bootstrap approach to numerically estimate the errors of RFF approximations. Three key advantages of this approach are: (1) The error estimates are specific to the problem at hand, avoiding the pessimism of worst-case bounds. (2) The approach is flexible with respect to different uses of RFF, and can even estimate errors in downstream learning tasks. (3) The approach enables adaptive computation, in the sense that the user can quickly inspect the error of a rough initial kernel approximation and then predict how much extra work is needed. Furthermore, in exchange for all of these benefits, the error estimates can be obtained at a modest computational cost. Junwen Yao, N. Benjamin Erichson, Miles E. Lopes |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2021 | Deep Learning for Functional Data Analysis with Adaptive Basis LayersabstractDespite their widespread success, the application of deep neural networks to functional data remains scarce today. The infinite dimensionality of functional data means standard learning algorithms can be applied only after appropriate dimension reduction, typically achieved via basis expansions. Currently, these bases are chosen a priori without the information for the task at hand and thus may not be effective for the designated task. We instead propose to adaptively learn these bases in an end-to-end fashion. We introduce neural networks that employ a new Basis Layer whose hidden units are each basis functions themselves implemented as a micro neural network. Our architecture learns to apply parsimonious dimension reduction to functional inputs that focuses only on information relevant to the target rather than irrelevant variation in the input function. Across numerous classification/regression tasks with functional data, our method empirically outperforms other types of neural networks, and we prove that our approach is statistically consistent with low generalization error. Junwen Yao, Jonas Mueller 0001, Jane-Ling Wang |
ICML | 1 |