Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wangbin Sun
dblp:296/4736
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0009-5532-4057ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Graph learning · 74% Representation and self-supervised learning · 26% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
graph contrastive learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Rethinking and Simplifying Bootstrapped Graph Latents · WSDM 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph self-supervised learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Rethinking and Simplifying Bootstrapped Graph Latents · WSDM 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph autoencoder |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | What's Behind the Mask: Understanding Masked Graph Modeling for Graph Autoencoders · KDD 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | What's Behind the Mask: Understanding Masked Graph Modeling for Graph Autoencoders · KDD 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph self-supervised learning
masked graph modeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | What's Behind the Mask: Understanding Masked Graph Modeling for Graph Autoencoders · KDD 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | What's Behind the Mask: Understanding Masked Graph Modeling for Graph Autoencoders · KDD 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
instance-level decorrelation · 0.8graph encoder · 0.8graph augmentation · 0.8masked autoencoding · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | FastGCL: Fast Self-Supervised Graph Learning for Service UnderstandingabstractBenefit from the widespread implement of data collection technologies, a large number of data services are emerged in various industries like finance and energy. The complex internal connectivity within these services can be naturally modeled as the graph-structured data, which facilitates services’ understanding based on graph mining. However, the heavy label reliance limits the development of traditional graph learning methods on data services. Graph contrastive learning (GCL), as a popular graph representation learning approach without relying on manual labels, has recently achieved a non-negligible effect. Thus, for alleviating above problems, we propose a simple yet effective method named FastGCL containing a better contrastive scheme which can be tailored to the characteristics of graph neural networks (e.g., neighborhood aggregation). Specifically, by constructing weighted-aggregated and non-aggregated neighborhood information as positive and negative samples respectively, FastGCL identifies the potential semantic information of data without disturbing the graph topology and node attributes, resulting in faster training and convergence speeds. Extensive experiments have been conducted on node classification and graph classification tasks, showing that FastGCL has competitive classification performance and significant training speedup compared to existing state-of-the-art methods. Huizhe Zhang, Wangbin Sun, Liang Chen 0001 |
ICWS | 2 |
| 2024 | Rethinking and Simplifying Bootstrapped Graph LatentsabstractGraph contrastive learning (GCL) has emerged as a representative paradigm in graph self-supervised learning, where negative samples are commonly regarded as the key to preventing model collapse and producing distinguishable representations. Recent studies have shown that GCL without negative samples can achieve state-of-the-art performance as well as scalability improvement, with bootstrapped graph latent (BGRL) as a prominent step forward. However, BGRL relies on a complex architecture to maintain the ability to scatter representations, and the underlying mechanisms enabling the success remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we introduce an instance-level decorrelation perspective to tackle the aforementioned issue and leverage it as a springboard to reveal the potential unnecessary model complexity within BGRL. Based on our findings, we present SGCL, a simple yet effective GCL framework that utilizes the outputs from two consecutive iterations as positive pairs, eliminating the negative samples. SGCL only requires a single graph augmentation and a single graph encoder without additional parameters. Extensive experiments conducted on various graph benchmarks demonstrate that SGCL can achieve competitive performance with fewer parameters, lower time and space costs, and significant convergence speedup. Wangbin Sun, Jintang Li, Liang Chen 0001, Bingzhe Wu, Yatao Bian, Zibin Zheng |
WSDM | 1 |
| 2023 | What's Behind the Mask: Understanding Masked Graph Modeling for Graph AutoencodersabstractThe last years have witnessed the emergence of a promising self-supervised learning strategy, referred to as masked autoencoding. However, there is a lack of theoretical understanding of how masking matters on graph autoencoders (GAEs). In this work, we present masked graph autoencoder (MaskGAE), a self-supervised learning framework for graph-structured data. Different from standard GAEs, MaskGAE adopts masked graph modeling (MGM) as a principled pretext task - masking a portion of edges and attempting to reconstruct the missing part with partially visible, unmasked graph structure. To understand whether MGM can help GAEs learn better representations, we provide both theoretical and empirical evidence to comprehensively justify the benefits of this pretext task. Theoretically, we establish close connections between GAEs and contrastive learning, showing that MGM significantly improves the self-supervised learning scheme of GAEs. Empirically, we conduct extensive experiments on a variety of graph benchmarks, demonstrating the superiority of MaskGAE over several state-of-the-arts on both link prediction and node classification tasks. Jintang Li, Wangbin Sun, Liang Chen 0001, Changhua Meng, Zibin Zheng, Weiqiang Wang 0002 |
KDD | 3 |
| 2021 | Semi-Supervised Multimodal Image Translation for Missing Modality ImputationabstractMissing data is a common problem in multimodal and multi-view learning. It raises a critical challenge for most multimodal algorithms, which are unable to deal with incomplete datasets. Rather than discarding entries with missing modalities, this paper aims to reconstruct the complete image-based multimodal data by imputing missing modalities. We solve the imputation problem as an image translation task, which transforms images in one domain to other domains. Existing image translation techniques either can not fully utilize the information contained in partially complete entries or are limited to the bimodal situation. We propose a semi-supervised algorithm for multimodal learning with missing data, namely Cyclic Autoencoder (CycAE). Specifically, a novel cyclical structure, as well as the correlation among modalities, is integrated to leverage infoπnation from complete entries to incomplete ones. Experiments on two multimodal datasets show that our model outperforms state-of-the-art models. Downstream tasks can also benefit from the completed datasets. Wangbin Sun, Fei Ma 0006, Yang Li 0104, Shao-Lun Huang, Shiguang Ni, Lin Zhang 0001 |
ICASSP | 1 |