VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shobhita Sundaram
dblp:297/5350
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Generative modeling · 35% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 14% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video coding · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Personalized Representation from Personalized Generation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
personalized image generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Personalized Representation from Personalized Generation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
personalized representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Personalized Representation from Personalized Generation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-task transfer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | When does perceptual alignment benefit vision representations? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
visual representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | When does perceptual alignment benefit vision representations? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
visual explanation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DreamSim: Learning New Dimensions of Human Visual Similarity using Synthetic Data · NeurIPS 2023 |
Image and video coding › image quality assessment
perceptual similarity |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DreamSim: Learning New Dimensions of Human Visual Similarity using Synthetic Data · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Personalized Representation from Personalized Generation · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
personalized segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Personalized Representation from Personalized Generation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | DreamSim: Learning New Dimensions of Human Visual Similarity using Synthetic Data · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic data generation · 1.3human similarity judgments · 1.3text-to-image diffusion · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9triplet learning · 0.8human similarity judgment finetuning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Personalized Representation from Personalized GenerationabstractModern vision models excel at general purpose downstream tasks. It is unclear, however, how they may be used for personalized vision tasks, which are both fine-grained and data-scarce. Recent works have successfully applied synthetic data to general-purpose representation learning, while advances in T2I diffusion models have enabled the generation of personalized images from just a few real examples. Here, we explore a potential connection between these ideas, and formalize the challenge of using personalized synthetic data to learn personalized representations, which encode knowledge about an object of interest and may be flexibly applied to any downstream task relating to the target object. We introduce an evaluation suite for this challenge, including reformulations of two existing datasets and a novel dataset explicitly constructed for this purpose, and propose a contrastive learning approach that makes creative use of image generators. We show that our method improves personalized representation learning for diverse downstream tasks, from recognition to segmentation, and analyze characteristics of image generation approaches that are key to this gain. Shobhita Sundaram, Julia Chae, Yonglong Tian, Sara Beery, Phillip Isola |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | When does perceptual alignment benefit vision representations?abstractHumans judge perceptual similarity according to diverse visual attributes, including scene layout, subject location, and camera pose. Existing vision models understand a wide range of semantic abstractions but improperly weigh these attributes and thus make inferences misaligned with human perception.
While vision representations have previously benefited from human preference alignment in contexts like image generation, the utility of perceptually aligned representations in more general-purpose settings remains unclear. Here, we investigate how aligning vision model representations to human perceptual judgments impacts their usability in standard computer vision tasks. We finetune state-of-the-art models on a dataset of human similarity judgments for synthetic image triplets and evaluate them across diverse computer vision tasks. We find that aligning models to perceptual judgments yields representations that improve upon the original backbones across many downstream tasks, including counting, semantic segmentation, depth estimation, instance retrieval, and retrieval-augmented generation. In addition, we find that performance is widely preserved on other tasks, including specialized out-of-distribution domains such as in medical imaging and 3D environment frames. Our results suggest that injecting an inductive bias about human perceptual knowledge into vision models can make them better representation learners. Shobhita Sundaram, Stephanie Fu, Lukas Muttenthaler, Netanel Tamir, Lucy Chai, Simon Kornblith, Trevor Darrell, Phillip Isola |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | DreamSim: Learning New Dimensions of Human Visual Similarity using Synthetic DataabstractCurrent perceptual similarity metrics operate at the level of pixels and patches. These metrics compare images in terms of their low-level colors and textures, but fail to capture mid-level similarities and differences in image layout, object pose, and semantic content. In this paper, we develop a perceptual metric that assesses images holistically. Our first step is to collect a new dataset of human similarity judgments over image pairs that are alike in diverse ways. Critical to this dataset is that judgments are nearly automatic and shared by all observers. To achieve this we use recent text-to-image models to create synthetic pairs that are perturbed along various dimensions. We observe that popular perceptual metrics fall short of explaining our new data, and we introduce a new metric, DreamSim, tuned to better align with human perception. We analyze how our metric is affected by different visual attributes, and find that it focuses heavily on foreground objects and semantic content while also being sensitive to color and layout. Notably, despite being trained on synthetic data, our metric generalizes to real images, giving strong results on retrieval and reconstruction tasks. Furthermore, our metric outperforms both prior learned metrics and recent large vision models on these tasks. Our project page: https://dreamsim-nights.github.io/ Stephanie Fu, Netanel Tamir, Shobhita Sundaram, Lucy Chai, Richard Zhang 0001, Tali Dekel, Phillip Isola |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Do Neural Networks for Segmentation Understand Insideness?abstractThe insideness problem is an aspect of image segmentation that consists of determining which pixels are inside and outside a region. Deep neural networks (DNNs) excel in segmentation benchmarks, but it is unclear if they have the ability to solve the insideness problem as it requires evaluating long-range spatial dependencies. In this letter, we analyze the insideness problem in isolation, without texture or semantic cues, such that other aspects of segmentation do not interfere in the analysis. We demonstrate that DNNs for segmentation with few units have sufficient complexity to solve the insideness for any curve. Yet such DNNs have severe problems with learning general solutions. Only recurrent networks trained with small images learn solutions that generalize well to almost any curve. Recurrent networks can decompose the evaluation of long-range dependencies into a sequence of local operations, and learning with small images alleviates the common difficulties of training recurrent networks with a large number of unrolling steps. Kimberly Villalobos, Vilim Stih, Amineh Ahmadinejad, Shobhita Sundaram, Jamell Dozier, Andrew Francl, Frederico Azevedo, Tomotake Sasaki, Xavier Boix |
Neural Comput. | 4 |