Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Renxiong Liu

dblp:297/5476 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 32% Learning theory · 32% Optimization for machine learning · 28%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 64% Approximation and online algorithms · 36%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
approximation guarantees
0.712023
Path following algorithms for 𝓁2-regularized M-estimation with approximation guarantee · NeurIPS 2023
Mathematical optimization › iterative methods
path following
0.712023
Path following algorithms for 𝓁2-regularized M-estimation with approximation guarantee · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
solution path
0.512021
An algorithmic view of L2 regularization and some path-following algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Mathematical optimization
regularization
0.512021
An algorithmic view of L2 regularization and some path-following algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
model misspecification
0.212022
On the consistent estimation of optimal Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ordinary differential equation solver · 1.0newton method · 1.0homotopy method · 1.0gradient descent · 1.0l2 regularization · 0.7homotopy continuation · 0.7surrogate loss analysis · 0.6population-level analysis · 0.6trust-region method · 0.5trust region method · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Path following algorithms for 𝓁2-regularized M-estimation with approximation guarantee
Yunzhang Zhu, Renxiong Liu
NeurIPS2
2022 On the consistent estimation of optimal Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve
abstract
Under a standard binary classification setting with possible model misspecification, we study the problem of estimating general Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, which is an arbitrary set of false positive rate (FPR) and true positive rate (TPR) pairs. We formally introduce the notion of \textit{optimal ROC curve} over a general model space. It is argued that any ROC curve estimation methods implemented over the given model space should target the optimal ROC curve over that space. Three popular ROC curve estimation methods are then analyzed at the population level (i.e., when there are infinite number of samples) under both correct and incorrect model specification. Based on our analysis, they are all consistent when the surrogate loss function satisfies certain conditions and the given model space includes all measurable classifiers. Interestingly, some of these conditions are similar to those that are required to ensure classification consistency. When the model space is incorrectly specified, however, we show that only one method leads to consistent estimation of the ROC curve over the chosen model space. We present some numerical results to demonstrate the effects of model misspecification on the performance of various methods in terms of their ROC curve estimates.
Renxiong Liu, Yunzhang Zhu
NeurIPS1
2021 An algorithmic view of L2 regularization and some path-following algorithms
abstract
We establish an equivalence between the $\ell_2$-regularized solution path for a convex loss function, and the solution of an ordinary differentiable equation (ODE). Importantly, this equivalence reveals that the solution path can be viewed as the flow of a hybrid of gradient descent and Newton method applying to the empirical loss, which is similar to a widely used optimization technique called trust region method. This provides an interesting algorithmic view of $\ell_2$ regularization, and is in contrast to the conventional view that the $\ell_2$ regularization solution path is similar to the gradient flow of the empirical loss. New path-following algorithms based on homotopy methods and numerical ODE solvers are proposed to numerically approximate the solution path. In particular, we consider respectively Newton method and gradient descent method as the basis algorithm for the homotopy method, and establish their approximation error rates over the solution path. Importantly, our theory suggests novel schemes to choose grid points that guarantee an arbitrarily small suboptimality for the solution path. In terms of computational cost, we prove that in order to achieve an $\epsilon$-suboptimality for the entire solution path, the number of Newton steps required for the Newton method is $\mathcal O(\epsilon^{-1/2})$, while the number of gradient steps required for the gradient descent method is $\mathcal O\left(\epsilon^{-1} \ln(\epsilon^{-1})\right)$. Finally, we use $\ell_2$-regularized logistic regression as an illustrating example to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed path-following algorithms.
Yunzhang Zhu, Renxiong Liu
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2