Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Niklas Koenen
dblp:297/5787
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4623-8271ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 64% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 16% Learning paradigms · 16% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Gradient-based Explanations for Deep Learning Survival Models · ICML 2025 Conditional Feature Importance with Generative Modeling Using Adversarial Random Forests · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature importance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Conditional Feature Importance with Generative Modeling Using Adversarial Random Forests · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
gradient-based attribution |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Gradient-based Explanations for Deep Learning Survival Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
survival analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Gradient-based Explanations for Deep Learning Survival Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › supervised learning
time-to-event prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Gradient-based Explanations for Deep Learning Survival Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
tabular data generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Conditional Feature Importance with Generative Modeling Using Adversarial Random Forests · AAAI 2025 |
Medical and health informatics
precision medicine |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Gradient-based Explanations for Deep Learning Survival Models · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient-based explanation · 1.7SurvSHAP · 1.7GradSHAP · 1.7statistical testing · 0.9generative modeling · 0.9adversarial random forests · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Conditional Feature Importance with Generative Modeling Using Adversarial Random ForestsabstractThis paper proposes a method for measuring conditional feature importance via generative modeling. In explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), conditional feature importance assesses the impact of a feature on a prediction model's performance given the information of other features. Model-agnostic post hoc methods to do so typically evaluate changes in the predictive performance under on-manifold feature value manipulations. Such procedures require creating feature values that respect conditional feature distributions, which can be challenging in practice. Recent advancements in generative modeling can facilitate this. For tabular data, which may consist of both categorical and continuous features, the adversarial random forest (ARF) stands out as a generative model that can generate on-manifold data points without requiring intensive tuning efforts or computational resources, making it a promising candidate model for subroutines in XAI methods. This paper proposes cARFi (conditional ARF feature importance), a method for measuring conditional feature importance through feature values sampled from ARF-estimated conditional distributions. cARFi requires only little tuning to yield robust importance scores that can flexibly adapt for conditional or marginal notions of feature importance, including straightforward extensions to condition on feature subsets and allows for inferring the significance of feature importances through statistical tests. Kristin Blesch, Niklas Koenen, Jan Kapar, Pegah Golchian, Lukas Burk, Markus Loecher, Marvin N. Wright |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2025 | Gradient-based Explanations for Deep Learning Survival ModelsabstractDeep learning survival models often outperform classical methods in time-to-event predictions, particularly in personalized medicine, but their "black box" nature hinders broader adoption. We propose a framework for gradient-based explanation methods tailored to survival neural networks, extending their use beyond regression and classification. We analyze the implications of their theoretical assumptions for time-dependent explanations in the survival setting and propose effective visualizations incorporating the temporal dimension. Experiments on synthetic data show that gradient-based methods capture the magnitude and direction of local and global feature effects, including time dependencies. We introduce GradSHAP(t), a gradient-based counterpart to SurvSHAP(t), which outperforms SurvSHAP(t) and SurvLIME in a computational speed vs. accuracy trade-off. Finally, we apply these methods to medical data with multi-modal inputs, revealing relevant tabular features and visual patterns, as well as their temporal dynamics. Sophie Hanna Langbein, Niklas Koenen, Marvin N. Wright |
ICML | 2 |