Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joseph Parker

dblp:298/0895 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 67% Video understanding and tracking · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
behavior representation learning
0.712023
MABe22: A Multi-Species Multi-Task Benchmark for Learned Representations of Behavior · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning
0.712023
MABe22: A Multi-Species Multi-Task Benchmark for Learned Representations of Behavior · ICML 2023
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video representation learning
0.712023
MABe22: A Multi-Species Multi-Task Benchmark for Learned Representations of Behavior · ICML 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › behavioral analysis
animal behavior analysis
0.212023
MABe22: A Multi-Species Multi-Task Benchmark for Learned Representations of Behavior · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised learning · 1.3pose tracking · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 MABe22: A Multi-Species Multi-Task Benchmark for Learned Representations of Behavior
abstract
We introduce MABe22, a large-scale, multi-agent video and trajectory benchmark to assess the quality of learned behavior representations. This dataset is collected from a variety of biology experiments, and includes triplets of interacting mice (4.7 million frames video+pose tracking data, 10 million frames pose only), symbiotic beetle-ant interactions (10 million frames video data), and groups of interacting flies (4.4 million frames of pose tracking data). Accompanying these data, we introduce a panel of real-life downstream analysis tasks to assess the quality of learned representations by evaluating how well they preserve information about the experimental conditions (e.g. strain, time of day, optogenetic stimulation) and animal behavior. We test multiple state-of-the-art self-supervised video and trajectory representation learning methods to demonstrate the use of our benchmark, revealing that methods developed using human action datasets do not fully translate to animal datasets. We hope that our benchmark and dataset encourage a broader exploration of behavior representation learning methods across species and settings.
Jennifer J. Sun, Markus Marks, Andrew Ulmer, Dipam Chakraborty, Brian Geuther, Edward Hayes, Heng Jia, Sebastian Oleszko, Zachary Partridge, Milan Peelman, Alice Robie, Catherine E. Schretter, Keith Sheppard, Param Uttarwar, Julian Morgan Wagner, Erik Werner, Joseph Parker, Pietro Perona, Yisong Yue, Kristin Branson, Ann Kennedy
ICML19
2021 Species Distribution Modeling for Machine Learning Practitioners: A Review
abstract
Conservation science depends on an accurate understanding of what’s happening in a given ecosystem. How many species live there? What is the makeup of the population? How is that changing over time? Species Distribution Modeling (SDM) seeks to predict the spatial (and sometimes temporal) patterns of species occurrence, i.e. where a species is likely to be found. The last few years have seen a surge of interest in applying powerful machine learning tools to challenging problems in ecology [2, 5, 8]. Despite its considerable importance, SDM has received relatively little attention from the computer science community. Our goal in this work is to provide computer scientists with the necessary background to read the SDM literature and develop ecologically useful ML-based SDM algorithms. In particular, we introduce key SDM concepts and terminology, review standard models, discuss data availability, and highlight technical challenges and pitfalls.
Sara Beery, Elijah Cole, Joseph Parker, Pietro Perona, Kevin Winner
COMPASS3