Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Braghadeesh Lakshminarayanan

dblp:298/1228 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-4893-0473ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 70% Time series and sequential data · 30%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit › pure exploration
best arm identification
0.512021
Bandit Quickest Changepoint Detection · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
change-point detection
0.512021
Bandit Quickest Changepoint Detection · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.512021
Bandit Quickest Changepoint Detection · NeurIPS 2021
Information theory › statistical inference › sequential analysis › sequential detection
quickest change detection
0.512021
Bandit Quickest Changepoint Detection · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration-exploitation tradeoff
0.112021
Bandit Quickest Changepoint Detection · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online sensing scheme · 1.0information-theoretic lower bounds · 0.5information-theoretic lower bound · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Finite Sample Analysis of a Data-Driven Estimator
abstract
Over the past decade, new types of estimators have been developed in statistics, signal processing and system identification, which apply tools from supervised learning, such as deep neural networks or kernel regression on synthetic data. In spite of their competitive performance, a systematic finite-sample analysis of these so-called data-driven estimators is still missing. In this paper, we take first steps in this direction by deriving finite-sample bounds for a specific data-driven estimator, known as the Two-Stage method. The derived bounds hold under fairly general conditions, and highlight the effect of different user choices involved in the construction of this estimator.
Braghadeesh Lakshminarayanan, Cristian R. Rojas
IEEE Signal Process. Lett.1
2021 Bandit Quickest Changepoint Detection
abstract
Many industrial and security applications employ a suite of sensors for detecting abrupt changes in temporal behavior patterns. These abrupt changes typically manifest locally, rendering only a small subset of sensors informative. Continuous monitoring of every sensor can be expensive due to resource constraints, and serves as a motivation for the bandit quickest changepoint detection problem, where sensing actions (or sensors) are sequentially chosen, and only measurements corresponding to chosen actions are observed. We derive an information-theoretic lower bound on the detection delay for a general class of finitely parameterized probability distributions. We then propose a computationally efficient online sensing scheme, which seamlessly balances the need for exploration of different sensing options with exploitation of querying informative actions. We derive expected delay bounds for the proposed scheme and show that these bounds match our information-theoretic lower bounds at low false alarm rates, establishing optimality of the proposed method. We then perform a number of experiments on synthetic and real datasets demonstrating the effectiveness of our proposed method.
Aditya Gopalan, Braghadeesh Lakshminarayanan, Venkatesh Saligrama
NeurIPS2