Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiyao Yin

dblp:298/3855 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Video understanding and tracking · 44% Image recognition and object detection · 44% Trustworthy machine learning · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
crowd analysis
0.812024
Crowd Descriptors and Interpretable Gathering Understanding · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2024
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object counting › crowd counting
density map estimation
0.812024
Crowd Descriptors and Interpretable Gathering Understanding · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.212024
Crowd Descriptors and Interpretable Gathering Understanding · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

density estimation · 0.8crowd descriptors · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Crowd Descriptors and Interpretable Gathering Understanding
abstract
Crowd gathering events deeply affect public safety. To enhance city management and avoid potential risks, many algorithms are designed for crowd analysis and deployed on video surveillance. Widely applied deep learning models also can be trained for crowd analysis. However, there are still few works focusing on crowd gathering behavior. Furthermore, as a result of the lack of interpretability of deep learning models, which also brings potential risk of being rejected by the users. In this paper, we categorize crowd behaviors into wandering, merging, walking gathering, standing gathering, and dispersing. Also, we propose an interpretable framework for crowd gathering understanding based on crowd density estimation model and proposed crowd descriptors, named Irregularity, Sparsity, Randomness, and Volatility. The experiments on the PETS2009 dataset demonstrate our method has outperformed the previous works on the crowd gathering understanding task. Moreover, we further analyze the framework performance with different crowd feature extraction models and the relations between our descriptors and crowd behavior. Besides, an ablation study is conducted to investigate the effectiveness of the descriptors and differences between density estimation models. The results demonstrate the effectiveness and the much better interpretability of our framework. Our descriptors also show significant contributions to the quantification of crowd gathering behaviors.
Diping Yuan, Jiyao Yin, Shuang-Hua Yang
IEEE Trans. Multim.5