Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yimeng Zeng
dblp:298/4235
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-9676-0893ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 59% Efficient and distributed learning · 17% Language models and text generation · 9% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Query processing and optimization · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Covering Multiple Objectives with a Small Set of Solutions Using Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 Learned Offline Query Planning via Bayesian Optimization · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Covering Multiple Objectives with a Small Set of Solutions Using Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
black-box optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Covering Multiple Objectives with a Small Set of Solutions Using Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Zeroth-Order Fine-Tuning of LLMs with Transferable Static Sparsity · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Zeroth-Order Fine-Tuning of LLMs with Transferable Static Sparsity · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
multi-objective bayesian optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Covering Multiple Objectives with a Small Set of Solutions Using Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Zeroth-Order Fine-Tuning of LLMs with Transferable Static Sparsity · ICLR 2025 |
Query processing and optimization › query optimization
learned query optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learned Offline Query Planning via Bayesian Optimization · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Query processing and optimization
query planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learned Offline Query Planning via Bayesian Optimization · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial defense
adversarial regularization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generative Adversarial Model-Based Optimization via Source Critic Regularization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › computational creativity › creative generation
design generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generative Adversarial Model-Based Optimization via Source Critic Regularization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
model-based optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generative Adversarial Model-Based Optimization via Source Critic Regularization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization
offline optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generative Adversarial Model-Based Optimization via Source Critic Regularization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
surrogate model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generative Adversarial Model-Based Optimization via Source Critic Regularization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Performance-Improving Code Edits · ICLR 2024 |
Program synthesis and code generation › code generation with language models
LLM-based code optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Performance-Improving Code Edits · ICLR 2024 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › architectural simulation
full-system simulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Performance-Improving Code Edits · ICLR 2024 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Performance-Improving Code Edits · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bayesian optimization · 2.5variational autoencoder · 1.7self-play · 1.5retrieval-based few-shot prompting · 1.5large language model · 1.5fine-tuning · 1.5chain-of-thought · 1.5zeroth-order optimization · 0.9static sparsity · 0.9quantization · 0.9expected improvement · 0.9adversarial regularization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Zeroth-Order Fine-Tuning of LLMs with Transferable Static SparsityabstractZeroth-order optimization (ZO) is a memory-efficient strategy for fine-tuning Large Language Models using only forward passes. However, applying ZO fine-tuning in memory-constrained settings such as mobile phones and laptops remains challenging since these settings often involve weight quantization, while ZO requires full-precision perturbation and update. In this study, we address this limitation by combining static sparse ZO fine-tuning with quantization. Our approach transfers a small, static subset (0.1%) of "sensitive" parameters from pre-training to downstream tasks, focusing fine-tuning on this sparse set of parameters. The remaining untuned parameters are quantized, reducing memory demands. Our proposed workflow enables efficient ZO fine-tuning of an Llama2-7B model on a GPU device with less than 8GB of memory while outperforming full model ZO fine-tuning performance and in-context learning. Jikai Long, Yimeng Zeng, Zirui Liu 0001, Xinyu Yang 0002, Yide Ran, Jacob R. Gardner, Osbert Bastani, Christopher De Sa, Beidi Chen, Zhaozhuo Xu |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2025 | Covering Multiple Objectives with a Small Set of Solutions Using Bayesian OptimizationabstractIn multi-objective black-box optimization, the goal is typically to find solutions that optimize a set of $T$ black-box objective functions, $f_1, \ldots f_T$, simultaneously. Traditional approaches often seek a single Pareto-optimal set that balances trade-offs among all objectives. In contrast, we consider a problem setting that departs from this paradigm: finding a small set of $K < T$ solutions, that collectively "cover" the $T$ objectives. A set of solutions is defined as "covering" if, for each objective $f_1, \ldots f_T$, there is at least one good solution. A motivating example for this problem setting occurs in drug design. For example, we may have $T$ pathogens and aim to identify a set of $K < T$ antibiotics such that at least one antibiotic can be used to treat each pathogen. This problem, known as coverage optimization, has yet to be tackled with the Bayesian optimization (BO) framework. To fill this void, we develop Multi-Objective Coverage Bayesian Optimization (MOCOBO), a BO algorithm for solving coverage optimization. Our approach is based on a new acquisition function reminiscent of expected improvement in the vanilla BO setup. We demonstrate the performance of our method on high-dimensional black-box optimization tasks, including applications in peptide and molecular design. Results show that the coverage of the $K < T$ solutions found by MOCOBO matches or nearly matches the coverage of $T$ solutions obtained by optimizing each objective individually. Furthermore, in *in vitro* experiments, the peptides found by MOCOBO exhibited high potency against drug-resistant pathogens, further demonstrating the potential of MOCOBO for drug discovery. All of our code is publicly available at the following link: https://github.com/nataliemaus/mocobo. Natalie Maus, Kyurae Kim, Yimeng Zeng, Haydn Thomas Jones, Fangping Wan, Marcelo Der Torossian Torres, Cesar de la Fuente-Nunez, Jacob R. Gardner |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2025 | Learned Offline Query Planning via Bayesian OptimizationabstractAnalytics database workloads often contain queries that are executed repeatedly. Existing optimization techniques generally prioritize keeping optimization cost low, normally well below the time it takes to execute a single instance of a query. If a given query is going to be executed thousands of times, could it be worth investing significantly more optimization time? In contrast to traditional online query optimizers, we propose an offline query optimizer that searches a wide variety of plans and incorporates query execution as a primitive. Our offline query optimizer combines variational auto-encoders with Bayesian optimization to find optimized plans for a given query. We compare our technique to the optimal plans possible with PostgreSQL and recent RL-based systems over several datasets, and show that our technique finds faster query plans. Jeffrey Tao, Natalie Maus, Haydn Thomas Jones, Yimeng Zeng, Jacob R. Gardner, Ryan Marcus |
Proc. ACM Manag. Data | 4 |
| 2024 | Learning Performance-Improving Code EditsabstractWith the decline of Moore's law, optimizing program performance has become a major focus of software research. However, high-level optimizations such as API and algorithm changes remain elusive due to the difficulty of understanding the semantics of code. Simultaneously, pretrained large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities at solving a wide range of programming tasks. To that end, we introduce a framework for adapting LLMs to high-level program optimization. First, we curate a dataset of performance-improving edits made by human programmers of over 77,000 competitive C++ programming submission pairs, accompanied by extensive unit tests. A major challenge is the significant variability of measuring performance on commodity hardware, which can lead to spurious "improvements." To isolate and reliably evaluate the impact of program optimizations, we design an environment based on the gem5 full system simulator, the de facto simulator used in academia and industry. Next, we propose a broad range of adaptation strategies for code optimization; for prompting, these include retrieval-based few-shot prompting and chain-of-thought, and for finetuning, these include performance-conditioned generation and synthetic data augmentation based on self-play. A combination of these techniques achieves a mean speedup of 6.86$\times$ with eight generations, higher than average optimizations from individual programmers (3.66$\times$). Using our model's fastest generations, we set a new upper limit on the fastest speedup possible for our dataset at 9.64$\times$ compared to using the fastest human submissions available (9.56$\times$). Alexander Shypula, Aman Madaan, Yimeng Zeng, Uri Alon 0002, Jacob R. Gardner, Yiming Yang 0002, Milad Hashemi, Graham Neubig, Parthasarathy Ranganathan, Osbert Bastani, Amir Yazdanbakhsh |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | Generative Adversarial Model-Based Optimization via Source Critic RegularizationabstractOffline model-based optimization seeks to optimize against a learned surrogate model without querying the true oracle objective function during optimization. Such tasks are commonly encountered in protein design, robotics, and clinical medicine where evaluating the oracle function is prohibitively expensive. However, inaccurate surrogate model predictions are frequently encountered along offline optimization trajectories. To address this limitation, we propose *generative adversarial model-based optimization* using **adaptive source critic regularization (aSCR)**—a task- and optimizer- agnostic framework for constraining the optimization trajectory to regions of the design space where the surrogate function is reliable. We propose a computationally tractable algorithm to dynamically adjust the strength of this constraint, and show how leveraging aSCR with standard Bayesian optimization outperforms existing methods on a suite of offline generative design tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/michael-s-yao/gabo. Michael S. Yao, Yimeng Zeng, Hamsa Bastani, Jacob R. Gardner, James C. Gee, Osbert Bastani |
NeurIPS | 2 |