Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yimeng Zeng

dblp:298/4235 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-9676-0893ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 59% Efficient and distributed learning · 17% Language models and text generation · 9%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Query processing and optimization · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 18 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
1.122025
Covering Multiple Objectives with a Small Set of Solutions Using Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2025
Learned Offline Query Planning via Bayesian Optimization · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function
0.912025
Covering Multiple Objectives with a Small Set of Solutions Using Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
black-box optimization
0.912025
Covering Multiple Objectives with a Small Set of Solutions Using Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning
0.912025
Zeroth-Order Fine-Tuning of LLMs with Transferable Static Sparsity · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.912025
Zeroth-Order Fine-Tuning of LLMs with Transferable Static Sparsity · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
multi-objective bayesian optimization
0.912025
Covering Multiple Objectives with a Small Set of Solutions Using Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning
0.912025
Zeroth-Order Fine-Tuning of LLMs with Transferable Static Sparsity · ICLR 2025
Query processing and optimization › query optimization
learned query optimization
0.912025
Learned Offline Query Planning via Bayesian Optimization · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025
Query processing and optimization
query planning
0.912025
Learned Offline Query Planning via Bayesian Optimization · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial defense
adversarial regularization
0.812024
Generative Adversarial Model-Based Optimization via Source Critic Regularization · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › computational creativity › creative generation
design generation
0.812024
Generative Adversarial Model-Based Optimization via Source Critic Regularization · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
model-based optimization
0.812024
Generative Adversarial Model-Based Optimization via Source Critic Regularization · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization
offline optimization
0.812024
Generative Adversarial Model-Based Optimization via Source Critic Regularization · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
surrogate model
0.812024
Generative Adversarial Model-Based Optimization via Source Critic Regularization · NeurIPS 2024
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
0.812024
Learning Performance-Improving Code Edits · ICLR 2024
Program synthesis and code generation › code generation with language models
LLM-based code optimization
0.812024
Learning Performance-Improving Code Edits · ICLR 2024
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › architectural simulation
full-system simulation
0.212024
Learning Performance-Improving Code Edits · ICLR 2024
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation
0.212024
Learning Performance-Improving Code Edits · ICLR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian optimization · 2.5variational autoencoder · 1.7self-play · 1.5retrieval-based few-shot prompting · 1.5large language model · 1.5fine-tuning · 1.5chain-of-thought · 1.5zeroth-order optimization · 0.9static sparsity · 0.9quantization · 0.9expected improvement · 0.9adversarial regularization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Zeroth-Order Fine-Tuning of LLMs with Transferable Static Sparsity
abstract
Zeroth-order optimization (ZO) is a memory-efficient strategy for fine-tuning Large Language Models using only forward passes. However, applying ZO fine-tuning in memory-constrained settings such as mobile phones and laptops remains challenging since these settings often involve weight quantization, while ZO requires full-precision perturbation and update. In this study, we address this limitation by combining static sparse ZO fine-tuning with quantization. Our approach transfers a small, static subset (0.1%) of "sensitive" parameters from pre-training to downstream tasks, focusing fine-tuning on this sparse set of parameters. The remaining untuned parameters are quantized, reducing memory demands. Our proposed workflow enables efficient ZO fine-tuning of an Llama2-7B model on a GPU device with less than 8GB of memory while outperforming full model ZO fine-tuning performance and in-context learning.
Jikai Long, Yimeng Zeng, Zirui Liu 0001, Xinyu Yang 0002, Yide Ran, Jacob R. Gardner, Osbert Bastani, Christopher De Sa, Beidi Chen, Zhaozhuo Xu
ICLR3
2025 Covering Multiple Objectives with a Small Set of Solutions Using Bayesian Optimization
abstract
In multi-objective black-box optimization, the goal is typically to find solutions that optimize a set of $T$ black-box objective functions, $f_1, \ldots f_T$, simultaneously. Traditional approaches often seek a single Pareto-optimal set that balances trade-offs among all objectives. In contrast, we consider a problem setting that departs from this paradigm: finding a small set of $K < T$ solutions, that collectively "cover" the $T$ objectives. A set of solutions is defined as "covering" if, for each objective $f_1, \ldots f_T$, there is at least one good solution. A motivating example for this problem setting occurs in drug design. For example, we may have $T$ pathogens and aim to identify a set of $K < T$ antibiotics such that at least one antibiotic can be used to treat each pathogen. This problem, known as coverage optimization, has yet to be tackled with the Bayesian optimization (BO) framework. To fill this void, we develop Multi-Objective Coverage Bayesian Optimization (MOCOBO), a BO algorithm for solving coverage optimization. Our approach is based on a new acquisition function reminiscent of expected improvement in the vanilla BO setup. We demonstrate the performance of our method on high-dimensional black-box optimization tasks, including applications in peptide and molecular design. Results show that the coverage of the $K < T$ solutions found by MOCOBO matches or nearly matches the coverage of $T$ solutions obtained by optimizing each objective individually. Furthermore, in *in vitro* experiments, the peptides found by MOCOBO exhibited high potency against drug-resistant pathogens, further demonstrating the potential of MOCOBO for drug discovery. All of our code is publicly available at the following link: https://github.com/nataliemaus/mocobo.
Natalie Maus, Kyurae Kim, Yimeng Zeng, Haydn Thomas Jones, Fangping Wan, Marcelo Der Torossian Torres, Cesar de la Fuente-Nunez, Jacob R. Gardner
NeurIPS3
2025 Learned Offline Query Planning via Bayesian Optimization
abstract
Analytics database workloads often contain queries that are executed repeatedly. Existing optimization techniques generally prioritize keeping optimization cost low, normally well below the time it takes to execute a single instance of a query. If a given query is going to be executed thousands of times, could it be worth investing significantly more optimization time? In contrast to traditional online query optimizers, we propose an offline query optimizer that searches a wide variety of plans and incorporates query execution as a primitive. Our offline query optimizer combines variational auto-encoders with Bayesian optimization to find optimized plans for a given query. We compare our technique to the optimal plans possible with PostgreSQL and recent RL-based systems over several datasets, and show that our technique finds faster query plans.
Jeffrey Tao, Natalie Maus, Haydn Thomas Jones, Yimeng Zeng, Jacob R. Gardner, Ryan Marcus
Proc. ACM Manag. Data4
2024 Learning Performance-Improving Code Edits
abstract
With the decline of Moore's law, optimizing program performance has become a major focus of software research. However, high-level optimizations such as API and algorithm changes remain elusive due to the difficulty of understanding the semantics of code. Simultaneously, pretrained large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities at solving a wide range of programming tasks. To that end, we introduce a framework for adapting LLMs to high-level program optimization. First, we curate a dataset of performance-improving edits made by human programmers of over 77,000 competitive C++ programming submission pairs, accompanied by extensive unit tests. A major challenge is the significant variability of measuring performance on commodity hardware, which can lead to spurious "improvements." To isolate and reliably evaluate the impact of program optimizations, we design an environment based on the gem5 full system simulator, the de facto simulator used in academia and industry. Next, we propose a broad range of adaptation strategies for code optimization; for prompting, these include retrieval-based few-shot prompting and chain-of-thought, and for finetuning, these include performance-conditioned generation and synthetic data augmentation based on self-play. A combination of these techniques achieves a mean speedup of 6.86$\times$ with eight generations, higher than average optimizations from individual programmers (3.66$\times$). Using our model's fastest generations, we set a new upper limit on the fastest speedup possible for our dataset at 9.64$\times$ compared to using the fastest human submissions available (9.56$\times$).
Alexander Shypula, Aman Madaan, Yimeng Zeng, Uri Alon 0002, Jacob R. Gardner, Yiming Yang 0002, Milad Hashemi, Graham Neubig, Parthasarathy Ranganathan, Osbert Bastani, Amir Yazdanbakhsh
ICLR3
2024 Generative Adversarial Model-Based Optimization via Source Critic Regularization
abstract
Offline model-based optimization seeks to optimize against a learned surrogate model without querying the true oracle objective function during optimization. Such tasks are commonly encountered in protein design, robotics, and clinical medicine where evaluating the oracle function is prohibitively expensive. However, inaccurate surrogate model predictions are frequently encountered along offline optimization trajectories. To address this limitation, we propose *generative adversarial model-based optimization* using **adaptive source critic regularization (aSCR)**—a task- and optimizer- agnostic framework for constraining the optimization trajectory to regions of the design space where the surrogate function is reliable. We propose a computationally tractable algorithm to dynamically adjust the strength of this constraint, and show how leveraging aSCR with standard Bayesian optimization outperforms existing methods on a suite of offline generative design tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/michael-s-yao/gabo.
Michael S. Yao, Yimeng Zeng, Hamsa Bastani, Jacob R. Gardner, James C. Gee, Osbert Bastani
NeurIPS2