Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Oleksii Sliusarenko
dblp:299/0705
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-1667-3552ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computational fabrication · 77% Geometric modeling and processing · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational fabrication
tool path generation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Geometry and tool motion planning for curvature adapted CNC machining · ACM Trans. Graph. 2021 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling
surface geometry |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Geometry and tool motion planning for curvature adapted CNC machining · ACM Trans. Graph. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
second order line contact analysis · 0.5continuous optimization · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Curve-guided 5-axis CNC flank milling of free-form surfaces using custom-shaped tools
Kanika Rajain, Oleksii Sliusarenko, Michal Bizzarri, Michael Barton 0002 |
Comput. Aided Geom. Des. | 2 |
| 2021 | Geometry and tool motion planning for curvature adapted CNC machiningabstractCNC machining is the leading subtractive manufacturing technology. Although it is in use since decades, it is far from fully solved and still a rich source for challenging problems in geometric computing. We demonstrate this at hand of 5-axis machining of freeform surfaces, where the degrees of freedom in selecting and moving the cutting tool allow one to adapt the tool motion optimally to the surface to be produced. We aim at a high-quality surface finish, thereby reducing the need for hard-to-control post-machining processes such as grinding and polishing. Our work is based on a careful geometric analysis of curvature-adapted machining via so-called second order line contact between tool and target surface. On the geometric side, this leads to a new continuous transition between "dual" classical results in surface theory concerning osculating circles of surface curves and osculating cones of tangentially circumscribed developable surfaces. Practically, it serves as an effective basis for tool motion planning. Unlike previous approaches to curvature-adapted machining, we solve locally optimal tool positioning and motion planning within a single optimization framework and achieve curvature adaptation even for convex surfaces. This is possible with a toroidal cutter that contains a negatively curved cutting area. The effectiveness of our approach is verified at hand of digital models, simulations and machined parts, including a comparison to results generated with commercial software. Michael Barton 0002, Michal Bizzarri, Florian Rist 0001, Oleksii Sliusarenko, Helmut Pottmann |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 4 |