Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dimosthenis Antypas

dblp:299/1573 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 62% Information extraction and text analysis · 38%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models
cultural knowledge
0.812024
BLEnD: A Benchmark for LLMs on Everyday Knowledge in Diverse Cultures and Languages · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.812024
BLEnD: A Benchmark for LLMs on Everyday Knowledge in Diverse Cultures and Languages · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
multilingual evaluation
0.812024
BLEnD: A Benchmark for LLMs on Everyday Knowledge in Diverse Cultures and Languages · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.812024
Multilingual Topic Classification in X: Dataset and Analysis · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification
topic classification
0.812024
Multilingual Topic Classification in X: Dataset and Analysis · EMNLP 2024
Web and social media mining
social media analysis
0.812024
Multilingual Topic Classification in X: Dataset and Analysis · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models
0.212024
Multilingual Topic Classification in X: Dataset and Analysis · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

topic modeling · 1.5multilingual language modeling · 1.5benchmark construction · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Automatic Extraction of Metaphoric Analogies from Literary Texts: Task Formulation, Dataset Construction, and Evaluation
abstract
Extracting metaphors and analogies from free text requires high-level reasoning abilities such as abstraction and language understanding. Our study focuses on the extraction of the concepts forming metaphoric analogies in literary texts. To this end, we construct a novel dataset in this domain with the help of domain experts. We compare the out-of-the-box ability of recent large language models (LLMs) to structure metaphoric mappings from fragments of texts containing rather explicit proportional analogies. The models are further evaluated on the generation of implicit elements of the analogy, which are indirectly suggested in the texts and inferred by human readers. The competitive results obtained by LLMs in our experiments are encouraging and open up new avenues such as automatically extracting analogies and metaphors from text instead of investing resources in domain experts to manually label data.
Joanne Boisson, Zara Siddique, Hsuvas Borkakoty, Dimosthenis Antypas, Luis Espinosa Anke, José Camacho-Collados
COLING4
2024 Multilingual Topic Classification in X: Dataset and Analysis
abstract
In the dynamic realm of social media, diverse topics are discussed daily, transcending linguistic boundaries.However, the complexities of understanding and categorising this content across various languages remain an important challenge with traditional techniques like topic modelling often struggling to accommodate this multilingual diversity.In this paper, we introduce X-Topic, a multilingual dataset featuring content in four distinct languages (English, Spanish, Japanese, and Greek), crafted for the purpose of tweet topic classification.Our dataset includes a wide range of topics, tailored for social media content, making it a valuable resource for scientists and professionals working on cross-linguistic analysis, the development of robust multilingual models, and computational scientists studying online dialogue.Finally, we leverage X-Topic to perform a comprehensive cross-linguistic and multilingual analysis, and compare the capabilities of current general-and domain-specific language models.
Dimosthenis Antypas, Asahi Ushio, Francesco Barbieri, José Camacho-Collados
EMNLP1
2024 BLEnD: A Benchmark for LLMs on Everyday Knowledge in Diverse Cultures and Languages
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) often lack culture-specific everyday knowledge, especially across diverse regions and non-English languages. Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs' cultural sensitivities are usually limited to a single language or online sources like Wikipedia, which may not reflect the daily habits, customs, and lifestyles of different regions. That is, information about the food people eat for their birthday celebrations, spices they typically use, musical instruments youngsters play or the sports they practice in school is not always explicitly written online. To address this issue, we introduce BLEnD, a hand-crafted benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' everyday knowledge across diverse cultures and languages. The benchmark comprises 52.6k question-answer pairs from 16 countries/regions, in 13 different languages, including low-resource ones such as Amharic, Assamese, Azerbaijani, Hausa, and Sundanese. We evaluate LLMs in two formats: short-answer questions, and multiple-choice questions. We show that LLMs perform better in cultures that are more present online, with a maximum 57.34% difference in GPT-4, the best-performing model, in the short-answer format.Furthermore, we find that LLMs perform better in their local languages for mid-to-high-resource languages. Interestingly, for languages deemed to be low-resource, LLMs provide better answers in English. We make our dataset publicly available at: https://github.com/nlee0212/BLEnD.
Junho Myung, Nayeon Lee, Yi Zhou 0019, Jiho Jin, Rifki Afina Putri, Dimosthenis Antypas, Hsuvas Borkakoty, Eunsu Kim, Carla Pérez-Almendros, Abinew Ali Ayele, Víctor Gutiérrez-Basulto, Yazmín Ibáñez-García, Hwaran Lee, Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad, Ki-Woong Park, Anar Rzayev, Nina White, Seid Muhie Yimam, Mohammad Taher Pilehvar, Nedjma Ousidhoum, José Camacho-Collados, Alice Oh
NeurIPS6
2022 Twitter Topic Classification
abstract
Social media platforms host discussions about a wide variety of topics that arise everyday. Making sense of all the content and organising it into categories is an arduous task. A common way to deal with this issue is relying on topic modeling, but topics discovered using this technique are difficult to interpret and can differ from corpus to corpus. In this paper, we present a new task based on tweet topic classification and release two associated datasets. Given a wide range of topics covering the most important discussion points in social media, we provide training and testing data from recent time periods that can be used to evaluate tweet classification models. Moreover, we perform a quantitative evaluation and analysis of current general- and domain-specific language models on the task, which provide more insights on the challenges and nature of the task.
Dimosthenis Antypas, Asahi Ushio, José Camacho-Collados, Vítor Silva 0003, Leonardo Neves, Francesco Barbieri
COLING1