Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haocheng Han
dblp:299/1786
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computational photography and imaging · 50% Image and video processing · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Deep learning architectures and training · 13% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cyber-physical and IoT security · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing
fuzzing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RSFuzz: A Robustness-Guided Swarm Fuzzing Framework Based on Behavioral Constraints · ASE 2025 |
Computational photography and imaging › image acquisition › imaging system design › camera design
autofocus |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Dynamic Adaptive Imaging System on Optoelectronic Tweezers Platform · ICRA 2024 |
Image and video processing › image enhancement
illumination normalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Dynamic Adaptive Imaging System on Optoelectronic Tweezers Platform · ICRA 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
counterfactual explanation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Counterfactual Explanations in Explainable AI: A Tutorial · KDD 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Counterfactual Explanations in Explainable AI: A Tutorial · KDD 2021 |
Cyber-physical and IoT security › robot security
multi-robot system security |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | RSFuzz: A Robustness-Guided Swarm Fuzzing Framework Based on Behavioral Constraints · ASE 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
robustness-guided fuzzing · 1.7behavioral constraints · 1.7peak-finding · 0.8gaussian blur compensation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | RSFuzz: A Robustness-Guided Swarm Fuzzing Framework Based on Behavioral ConstraintsabstractMulti-robot swarms play an essential role in complex missions including battlefield reconnaissance, agricultural pest monitoring, as well as disaster search and rescue. Unfortunately, given the complexity of swarm algorithms, logical vulnerabilities are inevitable and often lead to severe safety and security consequences. Although various methods have been presented for detecting logical vulnerabilities through software testing, when they are used in swarm environments, these techniques face significant challenges: 1) Due to the swarm’s vast composable parameter space, it is extremely difficult to generate failure-triggering scenarios, which is crucial to effectively expose logical vulnerabilities; 2) Because of the swarm’s high flexibility and dynamism, it is challenging to model and evaluate the global swarm state, particularly in terms of cooperative behaviors, which makes it difficult to detect logical vulnerabilities.In this work, we propose RSFuzz, a robustness-guided swarm fuzzing framework designed to detect logical vulnerabilities in multi-robot systems. It leverages the robustness of behavioral constraints to quantitatively evaluate the swarm state and guide the generation of failure-triggering scenarios. In addition, RSFuzz identifies and targets key swarm nodes for perturbations, effectively reducing the input space. Upon the RSFuzz framework, we construct two swarm fuzzing schemes, Single Attacker Fuzzing (SA-Fuzzing) and Multiple Attacker Fuzzing (MA-Fuzzing), which employ single and multiple attackers, respectively, during fuzzing to disturb swarm mission execution. We evaluated RSFuzz’s performance with three popular swarm algorithms in simulated environments. The results show that RSFuzz outperforms the state-of-the-art with an average improvement of 17.75% in effectiveness and a 38.4% increase in efficiency. We also validated some detected vulnerabilities in real-world environments. Our code and data are publicly available. Ruoyu Zhou, Zhiwei Zhang 0004, Haocheng Han, Xiaodong Zhang 0014, Zehan Chen, Jun Sun 0001, Yulong Shen 0001, Dehai Xu |
ASE | 3 |
| 2024 | Dynamic Adaptive Imaging System on Optoelectronic Tweezers PlatformabstractOptoelectronic tweezers (OET) has shown great promise in various applications, especially in the precise manipulation of microparticles and microorganisms on a micron and nanometer scale. This technology significantly enhances the efficiency of single-cell sorting and the development of antibody-based drugs. However, conventional OET platforms are limited by issues such as low autofocusing accuracy, restricted imaging field of view, and uneven illumination. To overcome these limitations, we have innovatively developed a dynamic adaptive imaging system. By incorporating peak-finding and in situ Gaussian blur compensation algorithms, we achieved rapid automatic focusing and illumination shadow compensation across an expanded field of view. At the same time, the system can also dynamically adjust compensation parameters under different lighting conditions. Our system has successfully completed comprehensive scanning of the optoelectronic tweezers chip, achieving a 60% reduction in autofocus time and a 15.8% improvement in lighting uniformity. Moreover, this imaging system demonstrates robust versatility and can serve as a reference for other optical systems. Chunyuan Gan, Haocheng Han, Hongyi Xiong, Chutian Wang, Lin Feng 0002 |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2021 | Counterfactual Explanations in Explainable AI: A TutorialabstractDeep learning has shown powerful performances in many fields, however its black-box nature hinders its further applications. In response, explainable artificial intelligence emerges, aiming to explain the predictions and behaviors of deep learning models. Among many explanation methods, counterfactual explanation has been identified as one of the best methods due to its resemblance to human cognitive process: to deliver an explanation by constructing a contrastive situation so that human may interpret the underlying mechanism by cognitively demonstrating the difference. Xiao-Hui Li 0009, Haocheng Han, Shendi Wang, Luning Wang, Caleb Chen Cao, Lei Chen 0002 |
KDD | 3 |