Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shuxin Lin
dblp:299/1943
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-8768-0107ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Multi-agent systems · 33% Language models and text generation · 29% Representation and self-supervised learning · 22% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 72% Machine learning and data management · 28% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent systems engineering
multi-agent evaluation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | AssetOpsBench-Live: Privacy-Aware Online Evaluation of Multi-Agent Performance in Industrial Operations · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FailureSensorIQ: A Multi-Choice QA Dataset for Understanding Sensor Relationships and Failure Modes · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
multiple-choice question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FailureSensorIQ: A Multi-Choice QA Dataset for Understanding Sensor Relationships and Failure Modes · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | AI Model Factory: Scaling AI for Industry 4.0 Applications · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning and data management
predictive maintenance |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | AI Model Factory: Scaling AI for Industry 4.0 Applications · AAAI 2023 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | AnomalyKiTS: Anomaly Detection Toolkit for Time Series · AAAI 2022 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
time series anomaly detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | AnomalyKiTS: Anomaly Detection Toolkit for Time Series · AAAI 2022 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
unsupervised anomaly detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | AnomalyKiTS: Anomaly Detection Toolkit for Time Series · AAAI 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | FailureSensorIQ: A Multi-Choice QA Dataset for Understanding Sensor Relationships and Failure Modes · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
failure pattern analysis · 2.0anomaly detection · 2.0containerized execution · 1.0clustering · 1.0react agent · 0.9perturbation-uncertainty-complexity analysis · 0.9semi-supervised learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | AssetOpsBench-Live: Privacy-Aware Online Evaluation of Multi-Agent Performance in Industrial OperationsabstractIndustrial automation increasingly relies on multi-agent AI, yet evaluation remains difficult due to task complexity and data confidentiality. We present AssetOpsBench-Live, a demo of a competition-ready platform for real-time, privacy-preserving evaluation of multi-agent AI in industrial contexts. The platform integrates AssetOpsBench, which measures six dimensions of multi-agent performance and performs automated failure-mode discovery, with Codabench, which supports reproducible, code-oriented competitions. End users first validate agents locally, then submit containerized code for execution on hidden industrial scenarios. Instead of raw trajectories, the system provides quantitative scores and clustered failure modes (e.g., reasoning--action mismatch, step repetition), enabling participants to identify failures, apply targeted improvements, and iteratively resubmit. By combining competition-based engagement with actionable diagnostics, AssetOpsBench-Live delivers reproducible, real-time insights reflecting real-world industrial constraints. Dhaval Patel 0002, Nianjun Zhou, Shuxin Lin, James T. Rayfield, Chathurangi Shyalika, Suryanarayana Reddy Yarrabothula |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2025 | FailureSensorIQ: A Multi-Choice QA Dataset for Understanding Sensor Relationships and Failure ModesabstractWe introduce FailureSensorIQ, a novel Multi-Choice Question-Answering (MCQA) benchmarking system designed to assess the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to reason and understand complex, domain-specific scenarios in Industry 4.0. Unlike traditional QA benchmarks, our system focuses on multiple aspects of reasoning through failure modes, sensor data, and the relationships between them across various industrial assets. Through this work, we envision a paradigm shift where modeling decisions are not only data-driven using statistical tools like correlation analysis and significance tests, but also domain-driven by specialized LLMs which can reason about the key contributors and useful patterns that can be captured with feature engineering.We evaluate the Industrial knowledge of over a dozen LLMs including GPT-4, Llama, and Mistral on FailureSensorIQ from different lens using Perturbation-Uncertainty-Complexity analysis, Expert Evaluation study, Asset-Specific Knowledge Gap analysis, ReAct agent using external knowledge-bases.Even though closed-source models with strong reasoning capabilities approach expert-level performance, the comprehensive benchmark reveals a significant drop in performance that is fragile to perturbations, distractions, and inherent knowledge gaps in the models.We also provide a real-world case study of how LLMs can drive the modeling decisions on 3 different failure prediction datasets related to various assets.We release: (a) expert-curated MCQA for various industrial assets, (b) FailureSensorIQ benchmark and Hugging Face leaderboard based on MCQA built from non-textual data found in ISO documents, and (c) ``LLMFeatureSelector'', an LLM-based feature selection scikit-learn pipeline. The software is available at https://github.com/IBM/FailureSensorIQ. Christodoulos Constantinides, Dhaval Patel 0002, Shuxin Lin, Claudio Guerrero, Sunil Dagajirao Patil, Jayant Kalagnanam |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | AI Model Factory: Scaling AI for Industry 4.0 ApplicationsabstractThis demo paper discusses a scalable platform for emerging Data-Driven AI Applications targeted toward predictive maintenance solutions. We propose a common AI software architecture stack for building diverse AI Applications such as Anomaly Detection, Failure Pattern Analysis, Asset Health Forecasting, etc. for more than a 100K industrial assets of similar class. As a part of the AI system demonstration, we have identified the following three key topics for discussion: Scaling model training across multiple assets, Joint execution of multiple AI applications; and Bridge the gap between current open source software tools and the emerging need for AI Applications. To demonstrate the benefits, AI Model Factory has been tested to build the models for various industrial assets such as Wind turbines, Oil wells, etc. The system is deployed on API Hub for demonstration. Dhaval Patel 0002, Shuxin Lin, Dhruv Shah, Srideepika Jayaraman, Joern Ploennigs, Anuradha Bhamidipaty, Jayant Kalagnanam |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2022 | AnomalyKiTS: Anomaly Detection Toolkit for Time SeriesabstractThis demo paper presents a design and implementation of a system AnomalyKiTS for detecting anomalies from time series data for the purpose of offering a broad range of algorithms to the end user, with special focus on unsupervised/semi-supervised learning. Given an input time series, AnomalyKiTS provides four categories of model building capabilities followed by an enrichment module that helps to label anomaly. AnomalyKiTS also supports a wide range of execution engines to meet the diverse need of anomaly workloads such as Serveless for CPU intensive work, GPU for deep-learning model training, etc. Dhaval Patel 0002, Venkata Sitaramagiridharganesh Ganapavarapu, Srideepika Jayaraman, Shuxin Lin, Anuradha Bhamidipaty, Jayant Kalagnanam |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2022 | DSServe - Data Science using ServerlessabstractAI Applications uses various data science tools such as Jupyter notebook to prescribe a series of steps, commonly referred as workflow, for building AI Solutions. The steps in workflow can be as simple as loading the data from remote storage, visualize the data for better understanding or conducting data quality study, or it can be as complex as generating features for modeling, best model discovery processes, etc. Clearly, different steps of the data science workflow has varying requirement of compute resources. Moreover, the execution of steps in workflow are Adhoc and Subjective. With wider availability of various Serverless technology, in this paper, we demonstrate a generalized framework that can be used to provide on demand scale out capability for the Data Science Workflow. In particular, we selected the most common AI operation, namely Automatic Model Selection, as an example to demonstrate benefits of serverless computing. We conducted a detailed experimental results using IBM Code Engine technology to validate the benefits of our proposed approach. Dhaval Patel 0002, Shuxin Lin, Jayant Kalagnanam |
IEEE Big Data | 2 |
| 2021 | Scaling Anomaly Detection Service Using Serverless TechnologyabstractThis poster paper presents an efficient design of deploying anomaly detection service using serverless technology. Our design is motivated by the fact that the workload originating from the service calls are adhoc and reserving the infrastructure upfront is not advisable. To address this, we utilized the emerging serverless platform for executing the incoming training request. Our extensive experimental analysis demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed idea. Dhaval Patel 0002, Shuxin Lin, Srideepika Jayaraman, Venkata Sitaramagiridharganesh Ganapavarapu, Anuradha Bhamidipaty, Jayant Kalagnanam |
IEEE BigData | 2 |