Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joshua Cutler

dblp:299/8179 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 67% Learning theory · 33%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
1.422024
Stochastic Approximation with Decision-Dependent Distributions: Asymptotic Normality and Optimality · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Stochastic Optimization under Distributional Drift · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic programming
decision-dependent distributions
0.812024
Stochastic Approximation with Decision-Dependent Distributions: Asymptotic Normality and Optimality · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic approximation
0.812024
Stochastic Approximation with Decision-Dependent Distributions: Asymptotic Normality and Optimality · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis
0.712023
Stochastic Optimization under Distributional Drift · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic gradient methods
0.712023
Stochastic Optimization under Distributional Drift · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis
0.512021
Stochastic optimization under time drift: iterate averaging, step-decay schedules, and high probability guarantees · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
high probability bounds
0.512021
Stochastic optimization under time drift: iterate averaging, step-decay schedules, and high probability guarantees · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization
0.512021
Stochastic optimization under time drift: iterate averaging, step-decay schedules, and high probability guarantees · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

step decay schedule · 1.2proximal stochastic gradient · 1.2iterate averaging · 1.2stochastic approximation · 0.8minimax optimality · 0.8averaging · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Stochastic Approximation with Decision-Dependent Distributions: Asymptotic Normality and Optimality
abstract
We analyze a stochastic approximation algorithm for decision-dependent problems, wherein the data distribution used by the algorithm evolves along the iterate sequence. The primary examples of such problems appear in performative prediction and its multiplayer extensions. We show that under mild assumptions, the deviation between the average iterate of the algorithm and the solution is asymptotically normal, with a covariance that clearly decouples the effects of the gradient noise and the distributional shift. Moreover, building on the work of Hájek and Le Cam, we show that the asymptotic performance of the algorithm with averaging is locally minimax optimal.
Joshua Cutler, Mateo Díaz, Dmitriy Drusvyatskiy
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2023 Stochastic Optimization under Distributional Drift
abstract
We consider the problem of minimizing a convex function that is evolving according to unknown and possibly stochastic dynamics, which may depend jointly on time and on the decision variable itself. Such problems abound in the machine learning and signal processing literature, under the names of concept drift, stochastic tracking, and performative prediction. We provide novel non-asymptotic convergence guarantees for stochastic algorithms with iterate averaging, focusing on bounds valid both in expectation and with high probability. The efficiency estimates we obtain clearly decouple the contributions of optimization error, gradient noise, and time drift. Notably, we identify a low drift-to-noise regime in which the tracking efficiency of the proximal stochastic gradient method benefits significantly from a step decay schedule. Numerical experiments illustrate our results.
Joshua Cutler, Dmitriy Drusvyatskiy, Zaïd Harchaoui
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2021 Stochastic optimization under time drift: iterate averaging, step-decay schedules, and high probability guarantees
abstract
We consider the problem of minimizing a convex function that is evolving in time according to unknown and possibly stochastic dynamics. Such problems abound in the machine learning and signal processing literature, under the names of concept drift and stochastic tracking. We provide novel non-asymptotic convergence guarantees for stochastic algorithms with iterate averaging, focusing on bounds valid both in expectation and with high probability. Notably, we show that the tracking efficiency of the proximal stochastic gradient method depends only logarithmically on the initialization quality when equipped with a step-decay schedule.
Joshua Cutler, Dmitriy Drusvyatskiy, Zaïd Harchaoui
NeurIPS1