Joachim Orthaber

dblp:299/8358 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-9982-0070ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 6 · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Plane Hamiltonian Cycles in Convex Drawings
Helena Bergold, Stefan Felsner, Meghana M. Reddy, Joachim Orthaber, Manfred Scheucher
Discret. Comput. Geom.4
2025 Subgraph-Universal Planar Graphs for Trees
Helena Bergold, Vesna Irsic Chenoweth, Robert Lauff, Joachim Orthaber, Manfred Scheucher, Alexandra Wesolek
WG4
2024 Plane Hamiltonian Cycles in Convex Drawings
abstract
A conjecture by Rafla from 1988 asserts that every simple drawing of the complete graph $K_n$ admits a plane Hamiltonian cycle. It turned out that already the existence of much simpler non-crossing substructures in such drawings is hard to prove. Recent progress was made by Aichholzer et al. and by Suk and Zeng who proved the existence of a plane path of length $Ω(\log n / \log \log n)$ and of a plane matching of size $Ω(n^{1/2})$ in every simple drawing of $K_n$. Instead of studying simpler substructures, we prove Rafla's conjecture for the subclass of convex drawings, the most general class in the convexity hierarchy introduced by Arroyo et al. Moreover, we show that every convex drawing of $K_n$ contains a plane Hamiltonian path between each pair of vertices (Hamiltonian connectivity) and a plane $k$-cycle for each $3 \leq k \leq n$ (pancyclicity), and present further results on maximal plane subdrawings.
Helena Bergold, Stefan Felsner, Meghana M. Reddy, Joachim Orthaber, Manfred Scheucher
SoCG4
2024 Separable Drawings: Extendability and Crossing-Free Hamiltonian Cycles
Oswin Aichholzer, Joachim Orthaber, Birgit Vogtenhuber
GD2
2024 On the Uncrossed Number of Graphs
abstract
Visualizing a graph $G$ in the plane nicely, for example, without crossings, is unfortunately not always possible. To address this problem, Masařík and Hliněný [GD 2023] recently asked for each edge of $G$ to be drawn without crossings while allowing multiple different drawings of $G$. More formally, a collection $\mathcal{D}$ of drawings of $G$ is uncrossed if, for each edge $e$ of $G$, there is a drawing in $\mathcal{D}$ such that $e$ is uncrossed. The uncrossed number $\mathrm{unc}(G)$ of $G$ is then the minimum number of drawings in some uncrossed collection of $G$. No exact values of the uncrossed numbers have been determined yet, not even for simple graph classes. In this paper, we provide the exact values for uncrossed numbers of complete and complete bipartite graphs, partly confirming and partly refuting a conjecture posed by Hliněný and Masařík. We also present a strong general lower bound on $\mathrm{unc}(G)$ in terms of the number of vertices and edges of $G$. Moreover, we prove NP-hardness of the related problem of determining the edge crossing number of a graph $G$, which is the smallest number of edges of $G$ taken over all drawings of $G$ that participate in a crossing. This problem was posed as open by Schaefer in his book [Crossing Numbers of Graphs 2018].
Martin Balko, Petr Hlinený, Tomás Masarík, Joachim Orthaber, Birgit Vogtenhuber, Mirko H. Wagner
GD4
2024 Holes in Convex and Simple Drawings
abstract
Gons and holes in point sets have been extensively studied in the literature. For simple drawings of the complete graph a generalization of the Erdős--Szekeres theorem is known and empty triangles have been investigated. We introduce a notion of $k$-holes for simple drawings and survey generalizations thereof, like empty $k$-cycles. We present a family of simple drawings without $4$-holes and prove a generalization of Gerken's empty hexagon theorem for convex drawings. A crucial intermediate step is the structural investigation of pseudolinear subdrawings in convex drawings. With respect to empty $k$-cycles, we show the existence of empty $4$-cycles in every simple drawing of $K_n$ and give a construction that admits only $Θ(n^2)$ of them.
Helena Bergold, Joachim Orthaber, Manfred Scheucher, Felix Schröder
GD2
2022 Edge Partitions of Complete Geometric Graphs
abstract
In this paper, we disprove the long-standing conjecture that any complete geometric graph on 2n vertices can be partitioned into n plane spanning trees. Our construction is based on so-called bumpy wheel sets. We fully characterize which bumpy wheels can and in particular which cannot be partitioned into plane spanning trees (or even into arbitrary plane subgraphs). Furthermore, we show a sufficient condition for generalized wheels to not admit a partition into plane spanning trees, and give a complete characterization when they admit a partition into plane spanning double stars. Finally, we initiate the study of partitions into beyond planar subgraphs, namely into k-planar and k-quasi-planar subgraphs and obtain first bounds on the number of subgraphs required in this setting.
Oswin Aichholzer, Johannes Obenaus, Joachim Orthaber, Rosna Paul, Patrick Schnider, Raphael Steiner, Tim Taubner, Birgit Vogtenhuber
SoCG3