Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alan S. Lapedes

dblp:30/1966 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 41% Trustworthy machine learning · 41% Learning theory · 18%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
0.021995
Neural Net Representations of Empirical Protein Potentials · ISMB 1995
Neural Network Definition of Highly Predictable Protein Secondary Structure Classes · NIPS 1993
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure analysis
protein binding site analysis
0.011994
Neural Networks for Determining Protein Specificity and Multiple Alignment of Binding Sites · ISMB 1994
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence alignment
0.011994
Neural Networks for Determining Protein Specificity and Multiple Alignment of Binding Sites · ISMB 1994
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › noisy data
noisy training data
0.011993
Use of Bad Training Data for Better Predictions · NIPS 1993
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data-centric deep learning
training data quality
0.011993
Use of Bad Training Data for Better Predictions · NIPS 1993
Machine learning › Learning theory
neural network theory
0.011987
How Neural Nets Work · NIPS 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural network · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Genetic Signatures in the Envelope Glycoproteins of HIV-1 that Associate with Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies
abstract
A steady increase in knowledge of the molecular and antigenic structure of the gp120 and gp41 HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins (Env) is yielding important new insights for vaccine design, but it has been difficult to translate this information to an immunogen that elicits broadly neutralizing antibodies. To help bridge this gap, we used phylogenetically corrected statistical methods to identify amino acid signature patterns in Envs derived from people who have made potently neutralizing antibodies, with the hypothesis that these Envs may share common features that would be useful for incorporation in a vaccine immunogen. Before attempting this, essentially as a control, we explored the utility of our computational methods for defining signatures of complex neutralization phenotypes by analyzing Env sequences from 251 clonal viruses that were differentially sensitive to neutralization by the well-characterized gp120-specific monoclonal antibody, b12. We identified ten b12-neutralization signatures, including seven either in the b12-binding surface of gp120 or in the V2 region of gp120 that have been previously shown to impact b12 sensitivity. A simple algorithm based on the b12 signature pattern was predictive of b12 sensitivity/resistance in an additional blinded panel of 57 viruses. Upon obtaining these reassuring outcomes, we went on to apply these same computational methods to define signature patterns in Env from HIV-1 infected individuals who had potent, broadly neutralizing responses. We analyzed a checkerboard-style neutralization dataset with sera from 69 HIV-1-infected individuals tested against a panel of 25 different Envs. Distinct clusters of sera with high and low neutralization potencies were identified. Six signature positions in Env sequences obtained from the 69 samples were found to be strongly associated with either the high or low potency responses. Five sites were in the CD4-induced coreceptor binding site of gp120, suggesting an important role for this region in the elicitation of broadly neutralizing antibody responses against HIV-1.
S. Gnanakaran, Marcus G. Daniels, Tanmoy Bhattacharya 0001, Alan S. Lapedes, Anurag Sethi, Haili Tang, Kelli Greene, Hongmei Gao, Barton F. Haynes, Myron S. Cohen, George M. Shaw, Michael S. Seaman, Amit Kumar 0021, David C. Montefiori, Bette T. Korber
PLoS Comput. Biol.4
1995 Neural Net Representations of Empirical Protein Potentials
Tal Grossman, Robert M. Farber, Alan S. Lapedes
ISMB3
1995 Use of Adaptive Networks to Define Highly Predictable Protein Secondary-Structure Classes
Alan S. Lapedes, Evan W. Steeg, Robert M. Farber
Mach. Learn.1
1995 Lorentzian neural nets
Bertrand Giraud, Alan S. Lapedes, Lon Chang Liu, Jörg C. Lemm
Neural Networks2
1994 Noise sensitivity signatures for model selection
abstract
Presents a method for calculating the "noise sensitivity signature" of a learning algorithm which is based on scrambling the output classes of various fractions of the training data. This signature can be used to indicate a good (or bad) match between the complexity of the classifier and the complexity of the data and hence to improve the predictive accuracy of a classification algorithm. Use of noise sensitivity signatures is distinctly different from other schemes to avoid overtraining, such as cross-validation, which uses only part of the training data, or various penalty functions, which are not data-adaptive. Noise sensitivity signature methods use all of the training data and are manifestly data-adaptive and nonparametric. They are well suited for situations with limited training data.
Tal Grossman, Alan S. Lapedes
ICPR (2)2
1994 Neural Networks for Determining Protein Specificity and Multiple Alignment of Binding Sites
John M. Heumann, Alan S. Lapedes, Gary D. Stormo
ISMB2
1993 Use of Bad Training Data for Better Predictions
Tal Grossman, Alan S. Lapedes
NIPS2
1993 Neural Network Definition of Highly Predictable Protein Secondary Structure Classes
Alan S. Lapedes, Evan W. Steeg, Robert M. Farber
NIPS1
1987 How Neural Nets Work
Alan S. Lapedes, Robert M. Farber
NIPS1