Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marko Horvat 0002

dblp:30/2094-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-3439-7216ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › internet security protocols
TLS 1.3
0.522017
A Comprehensive Symbolic Analysis of TLS 1.3 · CCS 2017
Automated Analysis and Verification of TLS 1.3: 0-RTT, Resumption and Delayed Authentication · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2016
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
security protocol analysis
0.312017
A Comprehensive Symbolic Analysis of TLS 1.3 · CCS 2017
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › security protocol analysis
symbolic verification
0.312017
A Comprehensive Symbolic Analysis of TLS 1.3 · CCS 2017
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange
authenticated key exchange
0.212016
Automated Analysis and Verification of TLS 1.3: 0-RTT, Resumption and Delayed Authentication · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2016
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
protocol verification
0.212016
Automated Analysis and Verification of TLS 1.3: 0-RTT, Resumption and Delayed Authentication · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tamarin prover · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 A Comprehensive Symbolic Analysis of TLS 1.3
abstract
The TLS protocol is intended to enable secure end-to-end communication over insecure networks, including the Internet. Unfortunately, this goal has been thwarted a number of times throughout the protocol's tumultuous lifetime, resulting in the need for a new version of the protocol, namely TLS 1.3. Over the past three years, in an unprecedented joint design effort with the academic community, the TLS Working Group has been working tirelessly to enhance the security of TLS.
Cas Cremers, Marko Horvat 0002, Jonathan Hoyland, Sam Scott, Thyla van der Merwe
CCS2
2017 Testing Cyber-Physical Systems through Bayesian Optimization
abstract
Many problems in the design and analysis of cyber-physical systems (CPS) reduce to the following optimization problem: given a CPS which transforms continuous-time input traces in R m to continuous-time output traces in R n and a cost function over output traces, find an input trace which minimizes the cost. Cyber-physical systems are typically so complex that solving the optimization problem analytically by examining the system dynamics is not feasible. We consider a black-box approach, where the optimization is performed by testing the input-output behaviour of the CPS. We provide a unified, tool-supported methodology for CPS testing and optimization. Our tool is the first CPS testing tool that supports Bayesian optimization. It is also the first to employ fully automated dimensionality reduction techniques. We demonstrate the potential of our tool by running experiments on multiple industrial case studies. We compare the effectiveness of Bayesian optimization to state-of-the-art testing techniques based on CMA-ES and Simulated Annealing.
Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh, Marko Horvat 0002, Xiaoqing Jin, Rupak Majumdar, Vinayak S. Prabhu
ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst.2
2016 Automated Analysis and Verification of TLS 1.3: 0-RTT, Resumption and Delayed Authentication
abstract
After a development process of many months, the TLS 1.3 specification is nearly complete. To prevent past mistakes, this crucial security protocol must be thoroughly scrutinised prior to deployment. In this work we model and analyse revision 10 of the TLS 1.3 specification using the Tamarin prover, a tool for the automated analysis of security protocols. We specify and analyse the interaction of various handshake modes for an unbounded number of concurrent TLS sessions. We show that revision 10 meets the goals of authenticated key exchange in both the unilateral and mutual authentication cases. We extend our model to incorporate the desired delayed client authentication mechanism, a feature that is likely to be included in the next revision of the specification, and uncover a potential attack in which an adversary is able to successfully impersonate a client during a PSK-resumption handshake. This observation was reported to, and confirmed by, the IETF TLS Working Group. Our work not only provides the first supporting evidence for the security of several complex protocol mode interactions in TLS 1.3, but also shows the strict necessity of recent suggestions to include more information in the protocol's signature contents.
Cas Cremers, Marko Horvat 0002, Sam Scott, Thyla van der Merwe
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy2
2014 Actor Key Compromise: Consequences and Countermeasures
abstract
Despite Alice's best efforts, her long-term secret keys may be revealed to an adversary. Possible reasons include weakly generated keys, compromised key storage, subpoena, and coercion. However, Alice may still be able to communicate securely with other parties, depending on the protocol used. We call the associated property resilience against Actor Key Compromise (AKC). We formalise this property in a symbolic model and identify conditions under which it can and cannot be achieved. In case studies that include TLS and SSH, we find that many protocols are not resilient against AKC. We implement a concrete AKC attack on the mutually authenticated TLS protocol.
David A. Basin, Cas Cremers, Marko Horvat 0002
CSF3