Quantum error correcting codes (QECC) are essential for constructing large-scale quantum computers that deliver faithful results. As strong competitors to the conventional surface code, quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes are emerging rapidly: they offer high encoding rates while maintaining reasonable physical-qubit connectivity requirements. Despite the existence of numerous code constructions, a notable gap persists between these designs—some of which remain purely theoretical—and their circuit-level deployment.In this work, we propose Auto-Stabilizer-Check (ASC), a universal compilation framework that generates depth-optimal syndrome extraction circuits for arbitrary qLDPC codes. ASC leverages the sparsity of parity-check matrices and exploits the commutativity of X and Z stabilizer measurement subroutines to search for optimal compilation schemes. By iteratively invoking an SMT solver, ASC returns a depth-optimal solution if a satisfying assignment is found, and a near-optimal solution in cases of solver timeouts. Notably, ASC provides the first definitive answer to one of IBM’s open problems: for all instances of bivariate bicycle (BB) code reported in their work, our compiler certifies that no depth-6 syndrome extraction circuit exists.Furthermore, by integrating ASC with an end-to-end evaluation framework—one that assesses different compilation settings under a circuit-level noise model—ASC reduces circuit depth by approximately 50% and achieves an average 7x-8x suppression of the logical error rate for general qLDPC codes, compared with as-soon-as-possible (ASAP) and coloration-based scheduling. ASC thus substantially reduces manual design overhead and demonstrates its strong potential to serve as a key component in accelerating hardware deployment of qLDPC codes.

We formalize and study the Hamiltonian certification problem, a fundamental task in quantum physics, crucial for verifying the accuracy of quantum simulations and quantum-enhanced technologies. Given access to \(e^{-iHt}\) for an unknown Hamiltonian \(H\), the goal of the problem is to determine whether \(H\) is \(\varepsilon_1\)-close to or \(\varepsilon_2\)-far from a target Hamiltonian \(H_0\). While Hamiltonian learning methods have been extensively studied, they often require restrictive assumptions and suffer from inefficiencies when adapted for certification tasks.

We give a meta-complexity characterization of EFI pairs, which are considered the “minimal” primitive in quantum cryptography (and are equivalent to quantum commitments). More precisely, we show that the existence of EFI pairs is equivalent to the following: there exists a non-uniformly samplable distribution over pure states such that the problem of estimating a certain Kolmogorov-like complexity measure is hard given a single copy.

Abstract Applications of decision diagrams in quantum circuit analysis have been an active research area. Our work introduces FeynmanDD, a new method utilizing standard and multi-terminal decision diagrams for quantum circuit simulation and equivalence checking. Unlike previous approaches that exploit patterns in quantum states and operators, our method explores useful structures in the path integral formulation, essentially transforming the analysis into a counting problem. The method then employs efficient counting algorithms using decision diagrams as its underlying computational engine. Through comprehensive theoretical analysis and numerical experiments, we demonstrate FeynmanDD’s capabilities and limitations in quantum circuit analysis, highlighting the value of this new BDD-based approach.

Quantum $k$-minimum finding is a fundamental subroutine with numerous applications in combinatorial problems and machine learning. Previous approaches typically assume oracle access to exact function values, making it challenging to integrate this subroutine with other quantum algorithms. In this paper, we propose an (almost) optimal quantum $k$-minimum finding algorithm that works with approximate values for all $k \geq 1$, extending a result of van Apeldoorn, Gilyén, Gribling, and de Wolf (FOCS 2017) for $k=1$. As practical applications of this algorithm, we present efficient quantum algorithms for identifying the $k$ smallest expectation values among multiple observables and for determining the $k$ lowest ground state energies of a Hamiltonian with a known eigenbasis.

International audience

Graph sparsification serves as a foundation for many algorithms, such as approximation algorithms for graph cuts and Laplacian system solvers. As its natural generalization, hypergraph sparsification has recently gained increasing attention, with broad applications in graph machine learning and other areas. In this work, we propose the first quantum algorithm for hypergraph sparsification, addressing an open problem proposed by Apers and de Wolf (FOCS’20). For a weighted hypergraph with $n$ vertices, $m$ hyperedges, and rank $r$, our algorithm outputs a near-linear size $\varepsilon$-spectral sparsifier in time $\widetilde O(r\sqrt{mn}/\varepsilon)$. This algorithm matches the quantum lower bound for constant $r$ and demonstrates quantum speedup when compared with the state-of-the-art $\widetilde O(mr)$-time classical algorithm. As applications, our algorithm implies quantum speedups for computing hypergraph cut sparsifiers, approximating hypergraph mincuts and hypergraph $s$-$t$ mincuts.

We study a parameterized version of the local Hamiltonian problem, called the weighted local Hamiltonian problem, where the relevant quantum states are superpositions of computational basis states of Hamming weight k . The Hamming weight constraint can have a physical interpretation as a constraint on the number of excitations allowed or the particle number in a system. We prove that this problem is in QW[1] , the first level of the quantum weft hierarchy, and that it is hard for QM[1] , the quantum analogue of M[1] . Our results show that this problem cannot be fixed parameter quantum tractable (FPQT) unless certain natural quantum analogue of the exponential time hypothesis (ETH) is false.

We propose the first online quantum algorithm for zero-sum games with $\widetilde O(1)$ regret under the game setting. Moreover, our quantum algorithm computes an $\varepsilon$-approximate Nash equilibrium of an $m \times n$ matrix zero-sum game in quantum time $\widetilde O(\sqrt{m+n}/\varepsilon^{2.5})$. Our algorithm uses standard quantum inputs and generates classical outputs with succinct descriptions, facilitating end-to-end applications. Technically, our online quantum algorithm "quantizes" classical algorithms based on the optimistic multiplicative weight update method. At the heart of our algorithm is a fast quantum multi-sampling procedure for the Gibbs sampling problem, which may be of independent interest.

A locally testable code is an error-correcting code that admits very efficient probabilistic tests of membership. Tensor codes provide a simple family of combinatorial constructions of locally testable codes that generalize the family of Reed-Muller codes. The natural test for tensor codes, the axis-parallel line vs. point test, plays an essential role in constructions of probabilistically checkable proofs. We analyze the axis-parallel line vs. point test as a two-prover game and show that the test is sound against quantum provers sharing entanglement. Our result implies the quantum-soundness of the low individual degree test, which is an essential component of the MIP* = RE theorem. Our proof also generalizes to the infinite-dimensional commuting-operator model of quantum provers.

The algorithm and complexity of approximating the permanent of a matrix is an extensively studied topic. Recently, its connection with quantum supremacy and more specifically BosonSampling draws a special attention to the average-case approximation problem of the permanent of random matrices with zero or small mean value for each entry. Eldar and Mehraban (FOCS 2018) gave a quasi-polynomial time algorithm for random matrices with mean at least 1/polyloglog(n). In this paper, we improve the result by designing a deterministic quasi-polynomial time algorithm and a PTAS for random matrices whose module of mean is at least 1/ polylog(n). We note that if the algorithm can be further improved to work with a mean value that is a sufficiently small 1/poly(n), it will disprove a central conjecture for quantum supremacy. Our algorithm is also much simpler and has a better and flexible trade-off for running time. The running time can be quasi-polynomial in both n and 1/∊, or PTAS (polynomial in n but exponential in 1/∊), where ∊ is the approximation parameter.

Prior work has established that all problems in NP admit classical zero-knowledge proof systems, and under reasonable hardness assumptions for quantum computations, these proof systems can be made secure against quantum attacks. We prove a result representing a further quantum generalization of this fact, which is that every problem in the complexity class QMA has a quantum zero-knowledge proof system. More specifically, assuming the existence of an unconditionally binding and quantum computationally concealing commitment scheme, we prove that every problem in the complexity class QMA has a quantum interactive proof system that is zero-knowledge with respect to efficient quantum computations. Our QMA proof system is sound against arbitrary quantum provers, but only requires an honest prover to perform polynomial-time quantum computations, provided that it holds a quantum witness for a given instance of the QMA problem under consideration. The proof system relies on a new variant of the QMA-complete local Hamiltonian problem in which the local terms are described by Clifford operations and standard basis measurements. We believe that the QMA-completeness of this problem may have other uses in quantum complexity.

We show that any language solvable in nondeterministic time exp( exp(⋯exp(n))), where the number of iterated exponentials is an arbitrary function R(n), can be decided by a multiprover interactive proof system with a classical polynomial-time verifier and a constant number of quantum entangled provers, with completeness 1 and soundness 1 − exp(−Cexp(⋯exp(n))), where the number of iterated exponentials is R(n)−1 and C>0 is a universal constant. The result was previously known for R=1 and R=2; we obtain it for any time-constructible function R.

We present a protocol that transforms any quantum multi-prover interactive proof into a nonlocal game in which questions consist of logarithmic number of bits and answers of constant number of bits. As a corollary, it follows that the promise problem corresponding to the approximation of the nonlocal value to inverse polynomial accuracy is complete for QMIP*, and therefore NEXP-hard. This establishes that nonlocal games are provably harder than classical games without any complexity theory assumptions. Our result also indicates that gap amplification for nonlocal games may be impossible in general and provides a negative evidence for the feasibility of the gap amplification approach to the multi-prover variant of the quantum PCP conjecture.

It is a fundamental problem to decide how many copies of an unknown mixed quantum state are necessary and sufficient to determine the state. Previously, it was known only that estimating states to error ε in trace distance required O(dr2/ε2) copies for a d-dimensional density matrix of rank r. Here, we give a theoretical measurement scheme (POVM) that requires O(dr/δ)ln (d/δ) copies to estimate ρ to error δ in infidelity, and a matching lower bound up to logarithmic factors. This implies O((dr/ε2)ln (d/ε)) copies suffice to achieve error ε in trace distance. We also prove that for independent (product) measurements, Ω(dr2/δ2)/ ln(1/δ) copies are necessary in order to achieve error δ in infidelity. For fixed d, our measurement can be implemented on a quantum computer in time polynomial in n.

Prior work has established that all problems in NP admit classical zero-knowledge proof systems, and under reasonable hardness assumptions for quantum computations, these proof systems can be made secure against quantum attacks. We prove a result representing a further quantum generalization of this fact, which is that every problem in the complexity class QMA has a quantum zero-knowledge proof system. More specifically, assuming the existence of an unconditionally binding and quantum computationally concealing commitment scheme, we prove that every problem in the complexity class QMA has a quantum interactive proof system that is zero-knowledge with respect to efficient quantum computations. Our QMA proof system is sound against arbitrary quantum provers, but only requires an honest prover to perform polynomial-time quantum computations, provided that it holds a quantum witness for a given instance of the QMA problem under consideration.

We discuss quantum capacities for two types of entanglement networks: Q for the quantum repeater network with free classical communication, and R for the tensor network as the rank of the linear operation represented by the tensor network. We find that Q always equals R in the regularized case for the same network graph. However, the relationships between the corresponding one-shot capacities Q1and R1are more complicated, and the min-cut upper bound is in general not achievable. We show that the tensor network can be viewed as a stochastic protocol with the quantum repeater network, such that R1is a natural upper bound of Q1. We analyze the possible gap between R1and Q1for certain networks, and compare them with the one-shot classical capacity of the corresponding classical network.

It is a fundamental problem to decide how many copies of an unknown mixed quantum state are necessary and sufficient to determine the state. This is the quantum analogue of the problem of estimating a probability distribution given some number of samples.

We present a classical interactive protocol that verifies the validity of a quantum witness state for the local Hamiltonian problem. It follows from this protocol that approximating the non-local value of a multi-player one-round game to inverse polynomial precision is QMA-hard. Our work makes an interesting connection between the theory of QMA-completeness and Hamiltonian complexity on one hand and the study of non-local games and Bell inequalities on the other.

This work considers the quantum interactive proof system model of computation, which is the (classical) interactive proof system model’s natural quantum computational analogue. An exact characterization of the expressive power of quantum interactive proof systems is obtained: the collection of computational problems having quantum interactive proof systems consists precisely of those problems solvable by deterministic Turing machines that use at most a polynomial amount of space (or, more succinctly, QIP = PSPACE). This characterization is proved through the use of a parallelized form of the matrix multiplicative weights update method, applied to a class of semidefinite programs that captures the computational power of quantum interactive proof systems. One striking implication of this characterization is that quantum computing provides no increase in computational power whatsoever over classical computing in the context of interactive proof systems, for it is well known that the collection of computational problems having classical interactive proof systems coincides with those problems solvable by polynomial-space computations.

We construct new families of multi-error-correcting quantum codes for the amplitude damping channel. Our key observation is that, with proper encoding, two uses of the amplitude damping channel simulate a quantum erasure channel. This allows us to use concatenated codes with quantum erasure-correcting codes as outer codes for correcting multiple amplitude damping errors. Our new codes are degenerate stabilizer codes and have parameters which are better than the amplitude damping codes obtained by any previously known construction.

We prove that the complexity class QIP, which consists of all problems having quantum interactive proof systems, is contained in PSPACE. This containment is proved by applying a parallelized form of the matrix multiplicative weights update method to a class of semidefinite programs that captures the computational power of quantum interactive proofs. As the containment of PSPACE in QIP follows immediately from the well-known equality IP = PSPACE, the equality QIP = PSPACE follows.

We introduce an algebra qCCS of pure quantum processes in which communications by moving quantum states physically are allowed and computations are modeled by super-operators, but no classical data is explicitly involved. An operational semantics of qCCS is presented in terms of (nonprobabilistic) labeled transition systems. Strong bisimulation between processes modeled in qCCS is defined, and its fundamental algebraic properties are established, including uniqueness of the solutions of recursive equations. To model sequential computation in qCCS, a reduction relation between processes is defined. By combining reduction relation and strong bisimulation we introduce the notion of strong reduction-bisimulation, which is a device for observing interaction of computation and communication in quantum systems. Finally, a notion of strong approximate bisimulation (equivalently, strong bisimulation distance) and its reduction counterpart are introduced. It is proved that both approximate bisimilarity and approximate reduction-bisimilarity are preserved by various constructors of quantum processes. This provides us with a formal tool for observing robustness of quantum processes against inaccuracy in the implementation of its elementary gates.

The efficiency of parameter estimation of quantum channels is studied in this paper. We introduce the concept of programmable parameters to the theory of estimation. It is found that programmable parameters obey the standard quantum limit strictly; hence, no speedup is possible in its estimation. We also construct a class of nonunitary quantum channels whose parameter can be estimated in a way that the standard quantum limit is broken. The study of estimation of general quantum channels also enables an investigation of the effect of noises on quantum estimation.

Modeling and reasoning about concurrent quantum systems is very important for both distributed quantum computing and quantum protocol verification. As a consequence, a general framework formally describing communication and concurrency in complex quantum systems is necessary. For this purpose, we propose a model named qCCS. It is a natural quantum extension of classical value-passing CCS which can deal with input and output of quantum states, and unitary transformations and measurements on quantum systems. The operational semantics of qCCS is given in terms of probabilistic labeled transition system. This semantics has many different features compared with the proposals in the available literature in order to describe the input and output of quantum systems which are possibly correlated with other components. Based on this operational semantics, the notions of strong probabilistic bisimulation and weak probabilistic bisimulation between quantum processes are introduced. Furthermore, some properties of these two probabilistic bisimulations, such as congruence under various combinators, are examined.