Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Christian Holler

dblp:30/2932 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Software testing · 71% Empirical software engineering · 18% Programming languages and type systems · 11%
Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
fuzzing
0.112012
Fuzzing with Code Fragments · USENIX Security Symposium 2012
Software testing › fuzzing
grammar-based fuzzing
0.112012
Fuzzing with Code Fragments · USENIX Security Symposium 2012
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery
0.112007
Predicting vulnerable software components · CCS 2007
Systems and software security › vulnerability prediction
vulnerable component prediction
0.112007
Predicting vulnerable software components · CCS 2007
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.112007
Predicting vulnerable software components · CCS 2007
Programming languages and type systems › language design
language syntax
0.012012
Fuzzing with Code Fragments · USENIX Security Symposium 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vulnerability database mining · 0.1version archive mining · 0.1fuzzing · 0.1code fragments · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Fuzzing with Code Fragments
Christian Holler, Kim Herzig, Andreas Zeller
USENIX Security Symposium1
2007 Predicting vulnerable software components
abstract
Where do most vulnerabilities occur in software? Our Vulture tool automatically mines existing vulnerability databases and version archives to map past vulnerabilities to components. The resulting ranking of the most vulnerable components is a perfect base for further investigations on what makes components vulnerable.
Stephan Neuhaus, Thomas Zimmermann 0001, Christian Holler, Andreas Zeller
CCS3