Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arun Kumar 0003

dblp:30/4308-3 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Authentication and access control · 70% Network security · 30%
Computer networks
1 paper
Wireless networking · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control
device pairing
0.222011
Pairing devices for social interactions: a comparative usability evaluation · CHI 2011
Caveat Emptor: A Comparative Study of Secure Device Pairing Methods · PerCom 2009
Network security › attack resilience › attack mitigation
man-in-the-middle attack prevention
0.112009
Caveat Emptor: A Comparative Study of Secure Device Pairing Methods · PerCom 2009
Wireless networking › wireless personal area network
device pairing
0.012009
Caveat Emptor: A Comparative Study of Secure Device Pairing Methods · PerCom 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

usability study · 0.2comparative evaluation · 0.2comparative usability evaluation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Pairing devices for social interactions: a comparative usability evaluation
abstract
When users wish to establish wireless radio communication between/among their devices, the channel has to be bootstrapped first. The process of setting up a secure communication channel between two previously unassociated devices is referred to as "Secure Device Pairing". The focus of prior research on this topic has mostly been limited to "personal pairing" scenarios, whereby a single user controls both the devices. In this paper, we instead consider "social pairing" scenarios, whereby two different users establish pairing between their respective devices. We present a comprehensive study to identify methods suitable for social pairing, and comparatively evaluate the usability and security of these methods. Our results identify methods best-suited for users, in terms of efficiency, error-tolerance and of course, usability. Our work provides insights on the applicability and usability of methods for emerging social pairing scenarios, a topic largely ignored so far.
Ersin Uzun, Nitesh Saxena, Arun Kumar 0003
CHI3
2009 Caveat Emptor: A Comparative Study of Secure Device Pairing Methods
abstract
ldquoSecure Device Pairingrdquo is the process of bootstrapping a secure channel between two previously unassociated devices over a (usually wireless) human-imperceptible communication channel. Lack of prior security context and common trust infrastructure open the door for Man-in-the-Middle (also known as Evil Twin) attacks. Mitigation of these attacks requires user involvement in the device pairing process. Prior research yielded a number of interesting methods utilizing various auxiliary human-perceptible channels, e.g., visual, acoustic or tactile. These methods engage the user in authenticating information exchanged over human-imperceptible channels, thus mitigating MiTM attacks and forming the basis for secure pairing. We present the first comprehensive comparative evaluation of notable secure device pairing methods. Our results identify methods best-suited for a given combination of devices and human abilities. This work is both important and timely, since it sheds light on usability in one of the very few settings where a wide range of users (not just specialists) are confronted with security techniques.
Arun Kumar 0003, Nitesh Saxena, Gene Tsudik, Ersin Uzun
PerCom1
2009 A comparative study of secure device pairing methods
Arun Kumar 0003, Nitesh Saxena, Gene Tsudik, Ersin Uzun
Pervasive Mob. Comput.1