Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Steven J. Bradtke

dblp:30/4917 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 45% Reinforcement learning · 40% Motion planning and robot control · 15%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning under uncertainty
0.011995
Learning to Act Using Real-Time Dynamic Programming · Artif. Intell. 1995
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
real-time dynamic programming
0.011995
Learning to Act Using Real-Time Dynamic Programming · Artif. Intell. 1995
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
semi-markov decision process
0.011994
Reinforcement Learning Methods for Continuous-Time Markov Decision Problems · NIPS 1994
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › dynamic programming
value iteration
0.011994
Reinforcement Learning Methods for Continuous-Time Markov Decision Problems · NIPS 1994
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › optimal control
linear quadratic regulator
0.011992
Reinforcement Learning Applied to Linear Quadratic Regulation · NIPS 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamic programming · 0.0stochastic approximation · 0.0q-learning · 0.0TD-learning · 0.0reinforcement learning · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Linear Least-Squares Algorithms for Temporal Difference Learning
Steven J. Bradtke, Andrew G. Barto
Mach. Learn.1
1995 Learning to Act Using Real-Time Dynamic Programming
Andrew G. Barto, Steven J. Bradtke, Satinder Singh 0001
Artif. Intell.2
1994 Reinforcement Learning Methods for Continuous-Time Markov Decision Problems
abstract
Semi-Markov Decision Problems are continuous time generaliza(cid:173) tions of discrete time Markov Decision Problems. A number of reinforcement learning algorithms have been developed recently for the solution of Markov Decision Problems, based on the ideas of asynchronous dynamic programming and stochastic approxima(cid:173) tion. Among these are TD(,x), Q-Iearning, and Real-time Dynamic Programming. After reviewing semi-Markov Decision Problems and Bellman's optimality equation in that context, we propose al(cid:173) gorithms similar to those named above, adapted to the solution of semi-Markov Decision Problems. We demonstrate these algorithms by applying them to the problem of determining the optimal con(cid:173) trol for a simple queueing system. We conclude with a discussion of circumstances under which these algorithms may be usefully ap(cid:173) plied.
Steven J. Bradtke, Michael O. Duff
NIPS1
1992 Reinforcement Learning Applied to Linear Quadratic Regulation
Steven J. Bradtke
NIPS1