Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Claudio Imoberdorf

dblp:30/702 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 62% Requirements engineering and software design · 38%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
integration testing
0.012000
UML-Based integration testing · ISSTA 2000
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture › component-based software engineering
component-based design
0.012000
UML-Based integration testing · ISSTA 2000
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.012000
UML-Based integration testing · ISSTA 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

UML-based modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 UML-Based integration testing
abstract
Increasing numbers of software developers are using the Unified Modeling Language (UML) and associated visual modeling tools as a basis for the design and implementation of their distributed, component-based applications. At the same time, it is necessary to test these components, especially during unit and integration testing.
Jean Hartmann, Claudio Imoberdorf, Michael Meisinger
ISSTA2