Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Emmanuelle Meugnier
dblp:30/8091
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
0000-0002-2291-7691ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Integrative mixture of experts to combine clinical factors and gene markers · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
machine learning for genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Integrative mixture of experts to combine clinical factors and gene markers · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomarker discovery
prognostic biomarker identification |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Integrative mixture of experts to combine clinical factors and gene markers · Bioinform. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixture of experts · 0.1gene selection · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Integrative mixture of experts to combine clinical factors and gene markersabstractMOTIVATION: Microarrays are being increasingly used in cancer research to better characterize and classify tumors by selecting marker genes. However, as very few of these genes have been validated as predictive biomarkers so far, it is mostly conventional clinical and pathological factors that are being used as prognostic indicators of clinical course. Combining clinical data with gene expression data may add valuable information, but it is a challenging task due to their categorical versus continuous characteristics. We have further developed the mixture of experts (ME) methodology, a promising approach to tackle complex non-linear problems. Several variants are proposed in integrative ME as well as the inclusion of various gene selection methods to select a hybrid signature. RESULTS: We show on three cancer studies that prediction accuracy can be improved when combining both types of variables. Furthermore, the selected genes were found to be of high relevance and can be considered as potential biomarkers for the prognostic selection of cancer therapy. AVAILABILITY: Integrative ME is implemented in the R package integrativeME (http://cran.r-project.org/). Kim-Anh Lê Cao, Emmanuelle Meugnier, Geoffrey J. McLachlan |
Bioinform. | 2 |