Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Buse Giledereli
dblp:300/1437
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-6169-0723ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Vision and language · 55% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 24% Information extraction and text analysis · 21% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
diagram understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Do Vision-Language Models Really Understand Visual Language? · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
relational reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Do Vision-Language Models Really Understand Visual Language? · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Do Vision-Language Models Really Understand Visual Language? · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Do Vision-Language Models Really Understand Visual Language? · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification
multi-label text classification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Balancing Methods for Multi-label Text Classification with Long-Tailed Class Distribution · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Balancing Methods for Multi-label Text Classification with Long-Tailed Class Distribution · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
test suite construction · 0.9reweighting · 0.5resampling · 0.5distribution-balanced loss · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Do Vision-Language Models Really Understand Visual Language?abstractVisual language is a system of communication that conveys information through symbols, shapes, and spatial arrangements. Diagrams are a typical example of a visual language depicting complex concepts and their relationships in the form of an image. The symbolic nature of diagrams presents significant challenges for building models capable of understanding them. Yet, recent studies seem to suggest that Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) can even tackle complex reasoning tasks involving diagrams. In this paper, we investigate this phenomenon by developing a comprehensive test suite to evaluate the diagram comprehension capability of LVLMs. Our test suite uses a variety of questions focused on concept entities and their relationships over a set of synthetic as well as real diagrams across several domains to evaluate the recognition and reasoning abilities of models. Our evaluation of six LVLMs shows that while these models can accurately identify and reason about entities, their ability to understand relationships is notably limited. Further testing reveals that the decent performance on diagram understanding largely stems from leveraging their background knowledge as shortcuts to identify and reason about the relational information. Thus, we conclude that LVLMs have a limited capability for genuine diagram understanding, and their impressive performance in diagram reasoning is an illusion emanating from other confounding factors, such as the background knowledge in the models. Buse Giledereli, Yilei Tu, Mrinmaya Sachan |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Balancing Methods for Multi-label Text Classification with Long-Tailed Class DistributionabstractMulti-label text classification is a challenging task because it requires capturing label dependencies.It becomes even more challenging when class distribution is long-tailed.Resampling and re-weighting are common approaches used for addressing the class imbalance problem, however, they are not effective when there is label dependency besides class imbalance because they result in oversampling of common labels.Here, we introduce the application of balancing loss functions for multilabel text classification.We perform experiments on a general domain dataset with 90 labels (Reuters-21578) and a domain-specific dataset from PubMed with 18211 labels.We find that a distribution-balanced loss function, which inherently addresses both the class imbalance and label linkage problems, outperforms commonly used loss functions.Distribution balancing methods have been successfully used in the image recognition field.Here, we show their effectiveness in natural language processing. Buse Giledereli, Abdullatif Köksal, Arzucan Özgür, Elif Özkirimli Ölmez |
EMNLP (1) | 2 |