Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Buse Giledereli

dblp:300/1437 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-6169-0723ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Vision and language · 55% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 24% Information extraction and text analysis · 21%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
diagram understanding
0.912025
Do Vision-Language Models Really Understand Visual Language? · ICML 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
relational reasoning
0.912025
Do Vision-Language Models Really Understand Visual Language? · ICML 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model evaluation
0.912025
Do Vision-Language Models Really Understand Visual Language? · ICML 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning
0.912025
Do Vision-Language Models Really Understand Visual Language? · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification
multi-label text classification
0.512021
Balancing Methods for Multi-label Text Classification with Long-Tailed Class Distribution · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.512021
Balancing Methods for Multi-label Text Classification with Long-Tailed Class Distribution · EMNLP (1) 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

test suite construction · 0.9reweighting · 0.5resampling · 0.5distribution-balanced loss · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Do Vision-Language Models Really Understand Visual Language?
abstract
Visual language is a system of communication that conveys information through symbols, shapes, and spatial arrangements. Diagrams are a typical example of a visual language depicting complex concepts and their relationships in the form of an image. The symbolic nature of diagrams presents significant challenges for building models capable of understanding them. Yet, recent studies seem to suggest that Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) can even tackle complex reasoning tasks involving diagrams. In this paper, we investigate this phenomenon by developing a comprehensive test suite to evaluate the diagram comprehension capability of LVLMs. Our test suite uses a variety of questions focused on concept entities and their relationships over a set of synthetic as well as real diagrams across several domains to evaluate the recognition and reasoning abilities of models. Our evaluation of six LVLMs shows that while these models can accurately identify and reason about entities, their ability to understand relationships is notably limited. Further testing reveals that the decent performance on diagram understanding largely stems from leveraging their background knowledge as shortcuts to identify and reason about the relational information. Thus, we conclude that LVLMs have a limited capability for genuine diagram understanding, and their impressive performance in diagram reasoning is an illusion emanating from other confounding factors, such as the background knowledge in the models.
Buse Giledereli, Yilei Tu, Mrinmaya Sachan
ICML2
2021 Balancing Methods for Multi-label Text Classification with Long-Tailed Class Distribution
abstract
Multi-label text classification is a challenging task because it requires capturing label dependencies.It becomes even more challenging when class distribution is long-tailed.Resampling and re-weighting are common approaches used for addressing the class imbalance problem, however, they are not effective when there is label dependency besides class imbalance because they result in oversampling of common labels.Here, we introduce the application of balancing loss functions for multilabel text classification.We perform experiments on a general domain dataset with 90 labels (Reuters-21578) and a domain-specific dataset from PubMed with 18211 labels.We find that a distribution-balanced loss function, which inherently addresses both the class imbalance and label linkage problems, outperforms commonly used loss functions.Distribution balancing methods have been successfully used in the image recognition field.Here, we show their effectiveness in natural language processing.
Buse Giledereli, Abdullatif Köksal, Arzucan Özgür, Elif Özkirimli Ölmez
EMNLP (1)2