Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stratis Markou

dblp:300/3941 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 16% Deep learning architectures and training · 14%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Coding theory · 79% Algorithms and data structures · 21%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
neural processes
2.742024
Noise-Aware Differentially Private Regression via Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Translation Equivariant Transformer Neural Processes · ICML 2024
Autoregressive Conditional Neural Processes · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
1.322024
Noise-Aware Differentially Private Regression via Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Practical Conditional Neural Process Via Tractable Dependent Predictions · ICLR 2022
Coding theory › source coding › lossless compression
relative entropy coding
1.222023
Faster Relative Entropy Coding with Greedy Rejection Coding · NeurIPS 2023
Fast Relative Entropy Coding with A* coding · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.912025
Variance-Reducing Couplings for Random Features · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel approximation
random features
0.912025
Variance-Reducing Couplings for Random Features · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction
0.912025
Variance-Reducing Couplings for Random Features · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant neural network
0.812024
Translation Equivariant Transformer Neural Processes · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
shift equivariance
0.812024
Translation Equivariant Transformer Neural Processes · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › neural processes
transformer neural processes
0.812024
Translation Equivariant Transformer Neural Processes · ICML 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private learning
0.812024
Noise-Aware Differentially Private Regression via Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private learning
differentially private regression
0.812024
Noise-Aware Differentially Private Regression via Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.812024
Noise-Aware Differentially Private Regression via Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model
0.712023
Autoregressive Conditional Neural Processes · ICLR 2023
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling
rejection sampling
0.712023
Faster Relative Entropy Coding with Greedy Rejection Coding · NeurIPS 2023
Coding theory
source coding
0.712023
Faster Relative Entropy Coding with Greedy Rejection Coding · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › neural processes
conditional neural process
0.612022
Practical Conditional Neural Process Via Tractable Dependent Predictions · ICLR 2022
Coding theory › source coding
lossless compression
0.612022
Fast Relative Entropy Coding with A* coding · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
prediction calibration
0.212024
Noise-Aware Differentially Private Regression via Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.212024
Noise-Aware Differentially Private Regression via Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.212022
Fast Relative Entropy Coding with A* coding · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

meta-learning · 1.5functional differential privacy mechanism · 1.5convolutional conditional neural process · 1.5optimal transport · 0.9monte carlo estimation · 0.9transformer · 0.8permutation invariant set functions · 0.8variational autoencoder · 0.7rejection sampling · 0.7conditional neural process · 0.7autoregressive decoding · 0.7tractable dependent predictions · 0.6relative entropy coding · 0.6a* sampling · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Variance-Reducing Couplings for Random Features
abstract
Random features (RFs) are a popular technique to scale up kernel methods in machine learning, replacing exact kernel evaluations with stochastic Monte Carlo estimates. They underpin models as diverse as efficient transformers (by approximating attention) to sparse spectrum Gaussian processes (by approximating the covariance function). Efficiency can be further improved by speeding up the convergence of these estimates: a variance reduction problem. We tackle this through the unifying lens of optimal transport, finding couplings to improve RFs defined on both Euclidean and discrete input spaces. They enjoy theoretical guarantees and sometimes provide strong downstream gains, including for scalable inference on graphs. We reach surprising conclusions about the benefits and limitations of variance reduction as a paradigm, showing that other properties of the coupling should be optimised for attention estimation in efficient transformers.
Isaac Reid, Stratis Markou, Krzysztof Choromanski, Richard E. Turner, Adrian Weller
ICLR2
2024 Translation Equivariant Transformer Neural Processes
abstract
The effectiveness of neural processes (NPs) in modelling posterior prediction maps—the mapping from data to posterior predictive distributions—has significantly improved since their inception. This improvement can be attributed to two principal factors: (1) advancements in the architecture of permutation invariant set functions, which are intrinsic to all NPs; and (2) leveraging symmetries present in the true posterior predictive map, which are problem dependent. Transformers are a notable development in permutation invariant set functions, and their utility within NPs has been demonstrated through the family of models we refer to as TNPs. Despite significant interest in TNPs, little attention has been given to incorporating symmetries. Notably, the posterior prediction maps for data that are stationary—a common assumption in spatio-temporal modelling—exhibit translation equivariance. In this paper, we introduce of a new family of translation equivariant TNPs that incorporate translation equivariance. Through an extensive range of experiments on synthetic and real-world spatio-temporal data, we demonstrate the effectiveness of TE-TNPs relative to their non-translation-equivariant counterparts and other NP baselines.
Matthew Ashman, Cristiana Diaconu, Junhyuck Kim, Lakee Sivaraya, Stratis Markou, James Requeima, Wessel P. Bruinsma, Richard E. Turner
ICML5
2024 Noise-Aware Differentially Private Regression via Meta-Learning
abstract
Many high-stakes applications require machine learning models that protect user privacy and provide well-calibrated, accurate predictions. While Differential Privacy (DP) is the gold standard for protecting user privacy, standard DP mechanisms typically significantly impair performance. One approach to mitigating this issue is pre-training models on simulated data before DP learning on the private data. In this work we go a step further, using simulated data to train a meta-learning model that combines the Convolutional Conditional Neural Process (ConvCNP) with an improved functional DP mechanism of Hall et al. (2013), yielding the DPConvCNP. DPConvCNP learns from simulated data how to map private data to a DP predictive model in one forward pass, and then provides accurate, well-calibrated predictions. We compare DPConvCNP with a DP Gaussian Process (GP) baseline with carefully tuned hyperparameters. The DPConvCNP outperforms the GP baseline, especially on non-Gaussian data, yet is much faster at test time and requires less tuning.
Ossi Räisä, Stratis Markou, Matthew Ashman, Wessel P. Bruinsma, Marlon Tobaben, Antti Honkela, Richard E. Turner
NeurIPS2
2023 Autoregressive Conditional Neural Processes
Wessel P. Bruinsma, Stratis Markou, James Requeima, Andrew Y. K. Foong, Tom R. Andersson, Anna Vaughan, Anthony Buonomo, J. Scott Hosking, Richard E. Turner
ICLR2
2023 Faster Relative Entropy Coding with Greedy Rejection Coding
abstract
Relative entropy coding (REC) algorithms encode a sample from a target distribution $Q$ using a proposal distribution $P$ using as few bits as possible. Unlike entropy coding, REC does not assume discrete distributions and require quantisation. As such, it can be naturally integrated into communication pipelines such as learnt compression and differentially private federated learning. Unfortunately, despite their practical benefits, REC algorithms have not seen widespread application, due to their prohibitively slow runtimes or restrictive assumptions. In this paper, we make progress towards addressing these issues. We introduce Greedy Rejection Coding (GRC), which generalises the rejection sampling-based algorithm of Harsha et al. (2007) to arbitrary probability spaces and partitioning schemes. We first show that GRC terminates almost surely and returns unbiased samples from $Q$, and then focus on two variants of GRC, namely GRCS and GRCD. We show that for continuous $Q$ and $P$ over $\mathbb{R}$ with unimodal $dQ/dP$, the expected runtime of GRCS is upper bounded by $\beta D_{KL}(Q||P) + \mathcal{O}(1)$ where $\beta \approx 4.82$, and its expected codelength is optimal. This makes GRCS the first REC algorithm with guaranteed optimal runtime for this class of distributions, up to the multiplicative constant $\beta$. This significantly improves upon the previous state-of-the-art method, A* coding (Flamich et al., 2022). Under the same assumptions, we experimentally observe and conjecture that the expected runtime and codelength of GRCD are upper bounded by $D_{KL}(Q||P) + \mathcal{O}(1)$. Finally, we evaluate GRC in a compression pipeline with variational autoencoders on MNIST, and show that a modified training objective and a codelength-compression method can further improve compression efficiency.
Gergely Flamich, Stratis Markou, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato
NeurIPS2
2022 Practical Conditional Neural Process Via Tractable Dependent Predictions
Stratis Markou, James Requeima, Wessel P. Bruinsma, Anna Vaughan, Richard E. Turner
ICLR1
2022 Fast Relative Entropy Coding with A* coding
abstract
Relative entropy coding (REC) algorithms encode a sample from a target distribution Q using a proposal distribution P, such that the expected codelength is O(KL[Q || P]). REC can be seamlessly integrated with existing learned compression models since, unlike entropy coding, it does not assume discrete Q or P, and does not require quantisation. However, general REC algorithms require an intractable $\Omega$(exp(KL[Q || P])) runtime. We introduce AS* and AD* coding, two REC algorithms based on A* sampling. We prove that, for continuous distributions over the reals, if the density ratio is unimodal, AS* has O(D$\infty$[Q || P]) expected runtime, where D$\infty$[Q || P] is the Renyi $\infty$-divergence. We provide experimental evidence that AD* also has O(D$\infty$[Q || P]) expected runtime. We prove that AS* and AD* achieve an expected codelength of O(KL[Q || P]). Further, we introduce DAD*, an approximate algorithm based on AD* which retains its favourable runtime and has bias similar to that of alternative methods. Focusing on VAEs, we propose the IsoKL VAE (IKVAE), which can be used with DAD* to further improve compression efficiency. We evaluate A* coding with (IK)VAEs on MNIST, showing that it can losslessly compress images near the theoretically optimal limit.
Gergely Flamich, Stratis Markou, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato
ICML2