VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tim Kutta
dblp:300/4027
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General-Purpose f-DP Estimation and Auditing in a Black-Box Setting
Önder Askin, Holger Dette, Martin Dunsche, Tim Kutta, Yun Lu 0001, Yu Wei 0007, Vassilis Zikas |
USENIX Security Symposium | 4 |
| 2024 | Lower Bounds for Rényi Differential Privacy in a Black-Box SettingabstractWe present new methods for assessing the privacy guarantees of an algorithm with regard to Rényi Differential Privacy. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to address this problem in a black-box scenario, where only algorithmic outputs are available. To quantify privacy leakage, we devise a new estimator for the Rényi divergence of a pair of output distributions. This estimator is transformed into a statistical lower bound that is proven to hold for large samples with high probability. Our method is applicable for a broad class of algorithms, including many well-known examples from the privacy literature. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by experiments encompassing algorithms and privacy enhancing methods that have not been considered in related works. Tim Kutta, Önder Askin, Martin Dunsche |
SP | 1 |
| 2022 | Multivariate Mean Comparison Under Differential Privacy
Martin Dunsche, Tim Kutta, Holger Dette |
PSD | 2 |
| 2022 | Statistical Quantification of Differential Privacy: A Local ApproachabstractIn this work, we introduce a new approach for statistical quantification of differential privacy in a black box setting. We present estimators and confidence intervals for the optimal privacy parameter of a randomized algorithm A, as well as other key variables (such as the “data-centric privacy level”). Our estimators are based on a local characterization of privacy and in contrast to the related literature avoid the process of “event selection” - a major obstacle to privacy validation. This makes our methods easy to implement and user-friendly. We show fast convergence rates of the estimators and asymptotic validity of the confidence intervals. An experimental study of various algorithms confirms the efficacy of our approach. Önder Askin, Tim Kutta, Holger Dette |
SP | 2 |