We give faster algorithms for weak expander decompositions and approximate max flow on undirected graphs. First, we show that it is possible to "warm start" the cut-matching game when computing weak expander decompositions, avoiding the cost of the recursion depth. Our algorithm is also flexible enough to support weaker flow subroutines than previous algorithms. Our second contribution is to streamline the recent non-recursive approximate max flow algorithm of Li, Rao, and Wang (SODA, 2025) and adapt their framework to use our new weak expander decomposition primitive. Consequently, we give an approximate max flow algorithm within a few logarithmic factors of the limit of expander decomposition-based approaches.

We aim to revive Thorup’s conjecture [Thorup, WG’92] on the existence of reachability shortcuts with ideal size-diameter tradeoffs. Thorup originally asked whether, given any graph G=(V,E) with m edges, we can add m1+o(1) “shortcut” edges E+ from the transitive closure E* of G so that G+(u,v) ≤ mo(1) for all (u,v)∈ E*, where G+=(V,E∪ E+). The conjecture was refuted by Hesse [Hesse, SODA’03], followed by significant efforts in the last few years to optimize the lower bounds.

We give an algorithm for finding the arboricity of a weighted, undirected graph, defined as the minimum number of spanning forests that cover all edges of the graph, in $\sqrt{n} m^{1+o(1)}$ time. This improves on the previous best bound of $\tilde{O}(nm)$ for weighted graphs and $\tilde{O}\left(\mathrm{~m}^{3/2}\right)$ for unweighted graphs (Gabow 1995) for this problem. The running time of our algorithm is dominated by a logarithmic number of calls to a directed global minimum cut subroutine – if the running time of the latter problem improves to $m^{1+o(1)}$ (thereby matching the running time of maximum flow), the running time of our arboricity algorithm would improve further to $m^{1+o(1)}$. We also give a new algorithm for computing the entire cut hierarchy – laminar multiway cuts with minimum cut ratio in recursively defined induced subgraphs – in $m n^{1+o(1)}$ time. The cut hierarchy yields the ideal edge loads (Thorup 2001) in a fractional spanning tree packing of the graph which, we show, also corresponds to a max-entropy solution in the spanning tree polytope. For the cut hierarchy problem, the previous best bound was $\tilde{O}\left(n^{2} m\right)$ for weighted graphs and $\tilde{O}\left(n m^{3/2}\right)$ for unweighted graphs.

Infinitely repeated games support equilibrium concepts beyond those present in one-shot games (e.g., cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma). Nonetheless, repeated games fail to capture our real-world intuition for settings with many anonymous agents interacting in pairs. Repeated games with restarts, introduced by Berker and Conitzer, address this concern by giving players the option to restart the game with someone new whenever their partner deviates from an agreed-upon sequence of actions. In their work, they studied symmetric games with symmetric strategies. We significantly extend these results, introducing and analyzing more general notions of equilibria in asymmetric games with restarts. We characterize which goal strategies players can be incentivized to play in equilibrium, and we consider the computational problem of finding such sequences of actions with minimal cost for the agents. We show that this problem is NP-hard in general. However, when the goal sequence maximizes social welfare, we give a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm.

In the Max-k-Diameter problem, we are given a set of points in a metric space, and the goal is to partition the input points into k parts such that the maximum pairwise distance between points in the same part of the partition is minimized.

Suppose we are given an $n$-node, $m$-edge input graph $G$, and the goal is to compute a spanning subgraph $H$ on $O(n)$ edges. This can be achieved in linear $O(m + n)$ time via breadth-first search. But can we hope for \emph{sublinear} runtime in some range of parameters? If the goal is to return $H$ as an adjacency list, there are simple lower bounds showing that $Ω(m + n)$ runtime is necessary. If the goal is to return $H$ as an adjacency matrix, then we need $Ω(n^2)$ time just to write down the entries of the output matrix. However, we show that neither of these lower bounds still apply if instead the goal is to return $H$ as an \emph{implicit} adjacency matrix, which we call an \emph{adjacency oracle}. An adjacency oracle is a data structure that gives a user the illusion that an adjacency matrix has been computed: it accepts edge queries $(u, v)$, and it returns in near-constant time a bit indicating whether $(u, v) \in E(H)$. Our main result is that one can construct an adjacency oracle for a spanning subgraph on at most $(1+\varepsilon)n$ edges, in $\tilde{O}(n \varepsilon^{-1})$ time, and that this construction time is near-optimal. Additional results include constructions of adjacency oracles for $k$-connectivity certificates and spanners, which are similarly sublinear on dense-enough input graphs. Our adjacency oracles are closely related to Local Computation Algorithms (LCAs) for graph sparsifiers; they can be viewed as LCAs with some computation moved to a preprocessing step, in order to speed up queries. Our oracles imply the first Local algorithm for computing sparse spanning subgraphs of general input graphs in $\tilde{O}(n)$ query time, which works by constructing our adjacency oracle, querying it once, and then throwing the rest of the oracle away. This addresses an open problem of Rubinfeld [CSR '17].

In the Continuous Steiner Tree problem (CST), we are given as input a set of points (called terminals) in a metric space and ask for the minimum-cost tree connecting them. Additional points (called Steiner points) from the metric space can be introduced as nodes in the solution. In the Discrete Steiner Tree problem (DST), we are given in addition to the terminals, a set of facilities, and any solution tree connecting the terminals can only contain the Steiner points from this set of facilities.