Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gabriele Venturato

dblp:301/6407 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0048-0898ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Reinforcement learning · 32% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 32% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 30%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
neuro-symbolic reasoning
0.912025
Relational Neurosymbolic Markov Models · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › knowledge-based reinforcement learning
neuro-symbolic reinforcement learning
0.912025
Neurosymbolic Reinforcement Learning: Playing MiniHack with Probabilistic Logic Shields · AAAI 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
probabilistic reasoning
0.912025
Neurosymbolic Reinforcement Learning: Playing MiniHack with Probabilistic Logic Shields · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning
0.912025
Neurosymbolic Reinforcement Learning: Playing MiniHack with Probabilistic Logic Shields · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.812024
Inference and Learning in Dynamic Decision Networks Using Knowledge Compilation · AAAI 2024
Automated reasoning and model checking
knowledge compilation
0.812024
Inference and Learning in Dynamic Decision Networks Using Knowledge Compilation · AAAI 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
safety guarantees
0.312025
Neurosymbolic Reinforcement Learning: Playing MiniHack with Probabilistic Logic Shields · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

knowledge compilation · 1.5probabilistic logic shields · 0.9gradient estimation · 0.9deep reinforcement learning · 0.9automated reasoning · 0.9approximate bayesian inference · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Neurosymbolic Reinforcement Learning: Playing MiniHack with Probabilistic Logic Shields
abstract
Probabilistic logic shields integrate deep reinforcement learning (RL) with probabilistic logic reasoning to train agents that operate in uncertain environments while giving strong guarantees with respect to logical constraints, such as safety properties. In this demo paper, we introduce a codebase that streamlines the design of custom MiniHack environments where neurosymbolic RL agents leverage probabilistic logic shields to learn safe and interpretable policies with strong guarantees. Our framework allows expert users to easily define and train agents that integrate deep neural policies with probabilistic logic in arbitrarily complex games: from simple exploration to planning and interacting with enemies. Additionally, we provide a web-based platform that showcases our application, offering an interactive interface for the broader community to experiment with and explore the capabilities of neurosymbolic reinforcement learning. This lowers the barrier for researchers and developers, making it accessible for a wider audience to engage with safety-critical RL scenarios.
David Debot, Gabriele Venturato, Giuseppe Marra, Luc De Raedt
AAAI2
2025 Relational Neurosymbolic Markov Models
abstract
Sequential problems are ubiquitous in AI, such as in reinforcement learning or natural language processing. State-of-the-art deep sequential models, like transformers, excel in these settings but fail to guarantee the satisfaction of constraints necessary for trustworthy deployment. In contrast, neurosymbolic AI (NeSy) provides a sound formalism to enforce constraints in deep probabilistic models but scales exponentially on sequential problems. To overcome these limitations, we introduce relational neurosymbolic Markov models (NeSy-MMs), a new class of end-to-end differentiable sequential models that integrate and provably satisfy relational logical constraints. We propose a strategy for inference and learning that scales on sequential settings, and that combines approximate Bayesian inference, automated reasoning, and gradient estimation. Our experiments show that NeSy-MMs can solve problems beyond the current state-of-the-art in neurosymbolic AI and still provide strong guarantees with respect to desired properties. Moreover, we show that our models are more interpretable and that constraints can be adapted at test time to out-of-distribution scenarios.
Lennert De Smet, Gabriele Venturato, Luc De Raedt, Giuseppe Marra
AAAI2
2025 Belief Re-Use in Partially Observable Monte Carlo Tree Search
abstract
sponsorship: KU Leuven|C14/24/092, KU Leuven|iBOF/21/075, Onderzoeksprogramma Artificiële Intelligentie (AI) Vlaanderen
Ebert Theeuwes, Gabriele Venturato, Gavin Rens
ICAART (2)2
2024 Inference and Learning in Dynamic Decision Networks Using Knowledge Compilation
Gabriele Venturato, Vincent Derkinderen, Pedro Zuidberg Dos Martires, Luc De Raedt
AAAI1
2024 SAT Meets Tableaux for Linear Temporal Logic Satisfiability
abstract
Abstract Linear temporal logic( $$\textsf{LTL}\,$$ LTL ) and its variant interpreted onfinite traces( $$\textsf{LTL}_{\textsf{f}\,}$$ LTLf ) are among the most popular specification languages in the fields of formal verification, artificial intelligence, and others. In this paper, we focus on the satisfiability problem for $$\textsf{LTL}\,$$ LTL and $$\textsf{LTL}_{\textsf{f}\,}$$ LTLf formulas, for which many techniques have been devised during the last decades. Among these aretableau systems, of which the most recent is Reynolds’ tree-shaped tableau. We provide a SAT-based algorithm for $$\textsf{LTL}\,$$ LTL and $$\textsf{LTL}_{\textsf{f}\,}$$ LTLf satisfiability checking based on Reynolds’ tableau, proving its correctness and discussing experimental results obtained through its implementation in the BLACK satisfiability checker.
Luca Geatti, Nicola Gigante, Angelo Montanari, Gabriele Venturato
J. Autom. Reason.4
2021 Past Matters: Supporting LTL+Past in the BLACK Satisfiability Checker
abstract
LTL+Past is the extension of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) supporting past temporal operators. The addition of the past does not add expressive power, but does increase the usability of the language both in formal verification and in artificial intelligence, e.g., in the context of multi-agent systems. In this paper, we add the support of past operators to BLACK, a satisfiability checker for LTL based on a SAT encoding of a tree-shaped tableau system. We implement two ways of supporting the past in the tool. The first one is an equisatisfiable translation that removes the past operators, obtaining a future-only formula that can be solved with the original LTL engine. The second one extends the SAT encoding of the underlying tableau to directly support the tableau rules that deal with past operators. We describe both approaches and experimentally compare the two between themselves and with the νXmv model checker, obtaining promising results.
Luca Geatti, Nicola Gigante, Angelo Montanari, Gabriele Venturato
TIME4