VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tejal Vishnoi
dblp:301/8114
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 44% Software maintenance and evolution · 44% Empirical software engineering · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution › program comprehension
identifier analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | An Ensemble Approach for Annotating Source Code Identifiers With Part-of-Speech Tags · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022 |
Program analysis
source code analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | An Ensemble Approach for Annotating Source Code Identifiers With Part-of-Speech Tags · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022 |
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | An Ensemble Approach for Annotating Source Code Identifiers With Part-of-Speech Tags · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ensemble machine learning · 0.6Stanford POS tagger · 0.6SWUM · 0.6POSSE · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | An Ensemble Approach for Annotating Source Code Identifiers With Part-of-Speech TagsabstractThis paper presents an ensemble part-of-speech tagging approach for source code identifiers. Ensemble tagging is a technique that uses machine-learning and the output from multiple part-of-speech taggers to annotate natural language text at a higher quality than the part-of-speech taggers are able to obtain independently. Our ensemble uses three state-of-the-art part-of-speech taggers: SWUM, POSSE, and Stanford. We study the quality of the ensemble’s annotations on five different types of identifier names: function, class, attribute, parameter, and declaration statement at the level of both individual words and full identifier names. We also study and discuss the weaknesses of our tagger to promote the future amelioration of these problems through further research. Our results show that the ensemble achieves 75 percent accuracy at the identifier level and 84-86 percent accuracy at the word level. This is an increase of +17% points at the identifier level from the closest independent part-of-speech tagger. Christian D. Newman, Michael John Decker, Reem S. Alsuhaibani, Anthony Peruma, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Satyajit Mohapatra, Tejal Vishnoi, Marcos Zampieri, Timothy J. Sheldon, Emily Hill 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 7 |