Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vladimir Fanaskov

dblp:301/9259 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0031-4272ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33% Motion planning and robot control · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › memory mechanism
associative memory networks
0.912025
Associative memory and dead neurons · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › dynamical system
dynamical systems analysis
0.912025
Associative memory and dead neurons · ICLR 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
lyapunov stability
0.912025
Associative memory and dead neurons · ICLR 2025
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning › physics-informed machine learning › physics-informed neural networks
partial differential equation solving
0.812024
Neural operators meet conjugate gradients: The FCG-NO method for efficient PDE solving · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › iterative methods
conjugate gradient method
0.812024
Neural operators meet conjugate gradients: The FCG-NO method for efficient PDE solving · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis
iterative solver
0.812024
Neural operators meet conjugate gradients: The FCG-NO method for efficient PDE solving · ICML 2024
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equation solver
neural PDE solver
0.712023
General Covariance Data Augmentation for Neural PDE Solvers · ICML 2023
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning
0.712023
General Covariance Data Augmentation for Neural PDE Solvers · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural operator · 1.5flexible conjugate gradient · 1.5lyapunov function analysis · 0.9hessian matrix analysis · 0.9general covariance · 0.7coordinate transformation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Associative memory and dead neurons
abstract
In ``Large Associative Memory Problem in Neurobiology and Machine Learning,'' Dmitry Krotov and John Hopfield introduced a general technique for the systematic construction of neural ordinary differential equations with non-increasing energy or Lyapunov function. We study this energy function and identify that it is vulnerable to the problem of dead neurons. Each point in the state space where the neuron dies is contained in a non-compact region with constant energy. In these flat regions, energy function alone does not completely determine all degrees of freedom and, as a consequence, can not be used to analyze stability or find steady states or basins of attraction. We perform a direct analysis of the dynamical system and show how to resolve problems caused by flat directions corresponding to dead neurons: (i) all information about the state vector at a fixed point can be extracted from the energy and Hessian matrix (of Lagrange function), (ii) it is enough to analyze stability in the range of Hessian matrix, (iii) if steady state touching flat region is stable the whole flat region is the basin of attraction. The analysis of the Hessian matrix can be complicated for realistic architectures, so we show that for a slightly altered dynamical system (with the same structure of steady states), one can derive a diverse family of Lyapunov functions that do not have flat regions corresponding to dead neurons. In addition, these energy functions allow one to use Lagrange functions with Hessian matrices that are not necessarily positive definite and even consider architectures with non-symmetric feedforward and feedback connections.
Vladimir Fanaskov, Ivan V. Oseledets
ICLR1
2024 Neural operators meet conjugate gradients: The FCG-NO method for efficient PDE solving
abstract
Deep learning solvers for partial differential equations typically have limited accuracy. We propose to overcome this problem by using them as preconditioners. More specifically, we apply discretization-invariant neural operators to learn preconditioners for the flexible conjugate gradient method (FCG). Architecture paired with novel loss function and training scheme allows for learning efficient preconditioners that can be used across different resolutions. On the theoretical side, FCG theory allows us to safely use nonlinear preconditioners that can be applied in $O(N)$ operations without constraining the form of the preconditioners matrix. To justify learning scheme components (the loss function and the way training data is collected) we perform several ablation studies. Numerical results indicate that our approach favorably compares with classical preconditioners and allows to reuse of preconditioners learned for lower resolution to the higher resolution data.
Alexander Rudikov, Vladimir Fanaskov, Ekaterina A. Muravleva, Yuri M. Laevsky, Ivan V. Oseledets
ICML2
2023 General Covariance Data Augmentation for Neural PDE Solvers
abstract
The growing body of research shows how to replace classical partial differential equation (PDE) integrators with neural networks. The popular strategy is to generate the input-output pairs with a PDE solver, train the neural network in the regression setting, and use the trained model as a cheap surrogate for the solver. The bottleneck in this scheme is the number of expensive queries of a PDE solver needed to generate the dataset. To alleviate the problem, we propose a computationally cheap augmentation strategy based on general covariance and simple random coordinate transformations. Our approach relies on the fact that physical laws are independent of the coordinate choice, so the change in the coordinate system preserves the type of a parametric PDE and only changes PDE’s data (e.g., initial conditions, diffusion coefficient). For tried neural networks and partial differential equations, proposed augmentation improves test error by 23% on average. The worst observed result is a 17% increase in test error for multilayer perceptron, and the best case is a 80% decrease for dilated residual network.
Vladimir Fanaskov, Tianchi Yu, Alexander Rudikov, Ivan V. Oseledets
ICML1
2021 Neural Multigrid Architectures
abstract
We propose a convenient matrix-free neural architecture for the multigrid method. The architecture is simple enough to be implemented in less than fifty lines of code, yet it encompasses a large number of distinct multigrid solvers. We argue that a fixed neural network without dense layers can not realize an efficient iterative method. Because of that, standard training protocols do not lead to competitive solvers. To overcome this difficulty, we use parameter sharing and serialization of layers. The resulting network can be trained on linear problems with thousands of unknowns and retains its efficiency on problems with millions of unknowns. From the point of view of numerical linear algebra network's training corresponds to finding optimal smoothers for the geometric multigrid method. We demonstrate our approach on a few second-order elliptic equations. For tested linear systems, we obtain from two to five times smaller spectral radius of the error propagation matrix compare to a basic linear multigrid with Jacobi smoother.
Vladimir Fanaskov
IJCNN1