VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yunzhe Hu
dblp:301/9545
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4895-7720ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20% Learning theory · 20% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An In-depth Investigation of Sparse Rate Reduction in Transformer-like Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
neural network interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An In-depth Investigation of Sparse Rate Reduction in Transformer-like Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › sparse coding › sparse feature learning
sparse rate reduction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An In-depth Investigation of Sparse Rate Reduction in Transformer-like Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An In-depth Investigation of Sparse Rate Reduction in Transformer-like Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
scene flow estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | What Matters for 3D Scene Flow Network · ECCV (33) 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric deep learning
point cloud network |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | What Matters for 3D Scene Flow Network · ECCV (33) 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unrolled optimization · 0.8regularization · 0.8deep learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Complexity-Aware Policy via Heterogeneous Experts for Robotic ManipulationabstractRobotic manipulation requires learning a generalizable policy that can adapt to complicated new environments. However, existing methods typically overlook the inherent task complexity and employ a policy with the same budget for tasks with varied difficulties, facing challenges in inefficient computational resource allocation and zero-shot generalization. In this work, we identify three facets of complexity imbalance issues in the current manipulation tasks at the Inter-task, Intra-task, and Noise-timesteps levels. To address this gap, we introduce the Complexity-Aware Policy (CAP), a novel approach integrating flow matching with a Transformer-based backbone and a Mixture of Heterogeneous Experts (MoHE) structure for policy learning. By leveraging Rectified Flow and dynamically adjusting model capacity based on task complexity, which is assessed through features like object counts and precision needs, our method allocates computational resources efficiently and effectively. This results in faster convergence, optimized computational resource usage, and improved precision across diverse manipulation tasks. Our proposed method achieves the state-of-the-art performance on widely-used CALVIN, LIBERO, and SimplerEnv benchmarks, and is further validated through six real-world experiments, where it consistently outperforms baseline methods across all tasks. Yunzhe Hu, Ge Yuan, Difan Zou, Jianxin Pang, Dong Xu 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. | 2 |
| 2024 | An In-depth Investigation of Sparse Rate Reduction in Transformer-like ModelsabstractDeep neural networks have long been criticized for being black-box. To unveil the inner workings of modern neural architectures, a recent work proposed an information-theoretic objective function called Sparse Rate Reduction (SRR) and interpreted its unrolled optimization as a Transformer-like model called Coding Rate Reduction Transformer (CRATE). However, the focus of the study was primarily on the basic implementation, and whether this objective is optimized in practice and its causal relationship to generalization remain elusive. Going beyond this study, we derive different implementations by analyzing layer-wise behaviors of CRATE, both theoretically and empirically. To reveal the predictive power of SRR on generalization, we collect a set of model variants induced by varied implementations and hyperparameters and evaluate SRR as a complexity measure based on its correlation with generalization. Surprisingly, we find out that SRR has a positive correlation coefficient and outperforms other baseline measures, such as path-norm and sharpness-based ones. Furthermore, we show that generalization can be improved using SRR as regularization on benchmark image classification datasets. We hope this paper can shed light on leveraging SRR to design principled models and study their generalization ability. Yunzhe Hu, Difan Zou |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | What Matters for 3D Scene Flow Network
Guangming Wang 0001, Yunzhe Hu, Zhe Liu 0022, Yiyang Zhou, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Hesheng Wang 0001 |
ECCV (33) | 2 |