Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Julian Ashwin

dblp:302/0250 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 77% Information extraction and text analysis · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression › probabilistic regression
bayesian regression
0.512021
Bayesian Topic Regression for Causal Inference · EMNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.512021
Bayesian Topic Regression for Causal Inference · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › topic model
supervised topic model
0.112021
Bayesian Topic Regression for Causal Inference · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model
0.112021
Bayesian Topic Regression for Causal Inference · EMNLP (1) 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised representation learning · 0.5bayesian topic model · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Bayesian Topic Regression for Causal Inference
abstract
Causal inference using observational text data is becoming increasingly popular in many research areas.This paper presents the Bayesian Topic Regression (BTR) model that uses both text and numerical information to model an outcome variable.It allows estimation of both discrete and continuous treatment effects.Furthermore, it allows for the inclusion of additional numerical confounding factors next to text data.To this end, we combine a supervised Bayesian topic model with a Bayesian regression framework and perform supervised representation learning for the text features jointly with the regression parameter training, respecting the Frisch-Waugh-Lovell theorem.Our paper makes two main contributions.First, we provide a regression framework that allows causal inference in settings when both text and numerical confounders are of relevance.We show with synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets that our joint approach recovers ground truth with lower bias than any benchmark model, when text and numerical features are correlated.Second, experiments on two real-world datasets demonstrate that a joint and supervised learning strategy also yields superior prediction results compared to strategies that estimate regression weights for text and non-text features separately, being even competitive with more complex deep neural networks.
Maximilian Ahrens, Julian Ashwin, Jan-P. Calliess
EMNLP (1)2