Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maxime Heuillet
dblp:302/3553
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Randomized Confidence Bounds for Stochastic Partial Monitoring · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
partial monitoring |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Randomized Confidence Bounds for Stochastic Partial Monitoring · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regret analysis · 0.8randomized confidence bounds · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Randomized Confidence Bounds for Stochastic Partial MonitoringabstractThe partial monitoring (PM) framework provides a theoretical formulation of sequential learning problems with incomplete feedback. At each round, a learning agent plays an action while the environment simultaneously chooses an outcome. The agent then observes a feedback signal that is only partially informative about the (unobserved) outcome. The agent leverages the received feedback signals to select actions that minimize the (unobserved) cumulative loss. In contextual PM, the outcomes depend on some side information that is observable by the agent before selecting the action. In this paper, we consider the contextual and non-contextual PM settings with stochastic outcomes. We introduce a new class of PM strategies based on the randomization of deterministic confidence bounds. We also extend regret guarantees to settings where existing stochastic strategies are not applicable. Our experiments show that the proposed RandCBP and RandCBPside* strategies have competitive performance against state-of-the-art baselines in multiple PM games. To illustrate how the PM framework can benefit real world applications, we design a use case on the real-world problem of monitoring the error rate of any deployed classification system. Maxime Heuillet, Ola Ahmad, Audrey Durand |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Neural Active Learning Meets the Partial Monitoring FrameworkabstractWe focus on the online-based active learning (OAL) setting where an agent operates over a stream of observations and trades-off between the costly acquisition of information (labelled observations) and the cost of prediction errors. We propose a novel foundation for OAL tasks based on partial monitoring, a theoretical framework specialized in online learning from partially informative actions. We show that previously studied binary and multi-class OAL tasks are instances of partial monitoring. We expand the real-world potential of OAL by introducing a new class of cost-sensitive OAL tasks. We propose NeuralCBP, the first PM strategy that accounts for predictive uncertainty with deep neural networks. Our extensive empirical evaluation on open source datasets shows that NeuralCBP has competitive performance against state-of-the-art baselines on multiple binary, multi-class and cost-sensitive OAL tasks. Maxime Heuillet, Ola Ahmad, Audrey Durand |
UAI | 1 |