Stein Stroobants

dblp:302/3656 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5733-1677ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
3D vision · 29% Reinforcement learning · 29% Efficient and distributed learning · 14%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Emerging computing paradigms · 91% Performance modeling and evaluation · 9%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning
0.912025
Adaptive Surrogate Gradients for Sequential Reinforcement Learning in Spiking Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
event-based depth estimation
0.912025
On-Device Self-Supervised Learning of Low-Latency Monocular Depth from Only Events · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
monocular depth estimation
0.912025
On-Device Self-Supervised Learning of Low-Latency Monocular Depth from Only Events · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › edge computing › on-device machine learning
on-device learning
0.912025
On-Device Self-Supervised Learning of Low-Latency Monocular Depth from Only Events · CVPR 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.912025
Adaptive Surrogate Gradients for Sequential Reinforcement Learning in Spiking Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › deep reinforcement learning
spiking reinforcement learning
0.912025
Adaptive Surrogate Gradients for Sequential Reinforcement Learning in Spiking Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Emerging computing paradigms
neuromorphic computing
0.912025
Adaptive Surrogate Gradients for Sequential Reinforcement Learning in Spiking Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Emerging computing paradigms › neuromorphic computing
spiking neural network training
0.912025
Adaptive Surrogate Gradients for Sequential Reinforcement Learning in Spiking Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots
0.612022
An Experimental Study of Wind Resistance and Power Consumption in MAVs with a Low-Speed Multi-Fan Wind System · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
obstacle avoidance
0.312025
On-Device Self-Supervised Learning of Low-Latency Monocular Depth from Only Events · CVPR 2025
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.212022
An Experimental Study of Wind Resistance and Power Consumption in MAVs with a Low-Speed Multi-Fan Wind System · ICRA 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

surrogate gradient · 1.7privileged guiding policy · 1.7behavioral cloning · 1.7adaptive slope schedule · 1.7power consumption measurement · 1.1multi-fan wind system · 1.1self-supervised learning · 0.9contrast maximization · 0.9TD3BC · 0.9TD3-BC · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 On-Device Self-Supervised Learning of Low-Latency Monocular Depth from Only Events
abstract
Event cameras provide low-latency perception for only milliwatts of power. This makes them highly suitable for resource-restricted, agile robots such as small flying drones. Self-supervised learning based on contrast maximization holds great potential for event-based robot vision, as it foregoes the need for high-frequency ground truth and allows for online learning in the robot’s operational environment. However, online, on-board learning raises the major challenge of achieving sufficient computational efficiency for real-time learning, while maintaining competitive visual perception performance. In this work, we improve the time and memory efficiency of the contrast maximization pipeline, making on-device learning of low-latency monocular depth possible. We demonstrate that online learning on board a small drone yields more accurate depth estimates and more successful obstacle avoidance behavior compared to only pre-training. Benchmarking experiments show that the proposed pipeline is not only efficient, but also achieves state-of-the-art depth estimation performance among self-supervised approaches. Our work taps into the unused potential of online, on-device robot learning, promising smaller reality gaps and better performance.
Jesse J. Hagenaars, Federico Paredes-Vallés, Stein Stroobants, Guido de Croon
CVPR4
2025 Adaptive Surrogate Gradients for Sequential Reinforcement Learning in Spiking Neural Networks
abstract
Neuromorphic computing systems are set to revolutionize energy-constrained robotics by achieving orders-of-magnitude efficiency gains, while enabling native temporal processing. Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) represent a promising algorithmic approach for these systems, yet their application to complex control tasks faces two critical challenges: (1) the non-differentiable nature of spiking neurons necessitates surrogate gradients with unclear optimization properties, and (2) the stateful dynamics of SNNs require training on sequences, which in reinforcement learning (RL) is hindered by limited sequence lengths during early training, preventing the network from bridging its warm-up period. We address these challenges by systematically analyzing surrogate gradient slope settings, showing that shallower slopes increase gradient magnitude in deeper layers but reduce alignment with true gradients. In supervised learning, we find no clear preference for fixed or scheduled slopes. The effect is much more pronounced in RL settings, where shallower slopes or scheduled slopes lead to a $\times2.1$ improvement in both training and final deployed performance. Next, we propose a novel training approach that leverages a privileged guiding policy to bootstrap the learning process, while still exploiting online environment interactions with the spiking policy. Combining our method with an adaptive slope schedule for a real-world drone position control task, we achieve an average return of 400 points, substantially outperforming prior techniques, including Behavioral Cloning and TD3BC, which achieve at most –200 points under the same conditions. This work advances both the theoretical understanding of surrogate gradient learning in SNNs and practical training methodologies for neuromorphic controllers demonstrated in real-world robotic systems.
Korneel Van den Berghe, Stein Stroobants, Vijay Janapa Reddi, Guido de Croon
NeurIPS2
2022 An Experimental Study of Wind Resistance and Power Consumption in MAVs with a Low-Speed Multi-Fan Wind System
abstract
This paper discusses a low-cost, open-source and open-hardware design and performance evaluation of a low-speed, multi-fan wind system dedicated to micro air vehicle (MAV) testing. In addition, a set of experiments with a flapping wing MAV and rotorcraft is presented, demonstrating the capabilities of the system and the properties of these different types of drones in response to various types of wind. We performed two sets of experiments where a MAV is flying into the wake of the fan system, gathering data about states, battery voltage and current. Firstly, we focus on steady wind conditions with wind speeds ranging from 0.5 m S-1 to 3.4 m S-1. During the second set of experiments, we introduce wind gusts, by periodically modulating the wind speed from 1.3 m S−1to 3.4 m S−1with wind gust oscillations of 0.5 Hz, 0.25 Hz and 0.125 Hz. The “Flapper” flapping wing MAV requires much larger pitch angles to counter wind than the “CrazyFlie” quadrotor. This is due to the Flapper's larger wing surface. In forward flight, its wings do provide extra lift, considerably reducing the power consumption. In contrast, the CrazyFlie's power consumption stays more constant for different wind speeds. The experiments with the varying wind show a quicker gust response by the CrazyFlie compared with the Flapper drone, but both their responses could be further improved. We expect that the proposed wind gust system will provide a useful tool to the community to achieve such improvements.
Diana A. Olejnik, Sunyi Wang, Julien Dupeyroux, Stein Stroobants, Matej Karásek, Christophe De Wagter, Guido de Croon
ICRA4