Theory of Mind (ToM) -- the ability to infer what others are thinking (e.g., intentions) from observable cues -- is traditionally considered fundamental to human social interactions. This has sparked growing efforts in building and benchmarking AI's ToM capability, yet little is known about how such capability could translate into the design and experience of everyday user-facing AI products and services. We conducted 13 co-design sessions with 26 U.S.-based AI practitioners to envision, reflect, and distill design recommendations for ToM-enabled everyday AI products and services that are both future-looking and grounded in the realities of AI design and development practices. Analysis revealed three interrelated design recommendations: ToM-enabled AI should 1) be situated in the social context that shape users' mental states, 2) be responsive to the dynamic nature of mental states, and 3) be attuned to subjective individual differences. We surface design tensions within each recommendation that reveal a broader gap between practitioners' envisioned futures of ToM-enabled AI and the realities of current AI design and development practices. These findings point toward the need to move beyond static, inference-driven approach to ToM and toward designing ToM as a pervasive capability that supports continuous human-AI interaction loops.

The rise of Generative AI (GenAI) has demonstrated significant potential to improve productivity and foster creativity among content creators, social media influencers with large audiences on platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. However, as GenAI tools became increasingly integrated into creative workflows, significant concerns have emerged about potential risks and harms, including misinformation, social biases, and threats to authenticity. While prior research in HCI and CSCW has documented the pressures content creators face within algorithmic ecosystems, relatively little is known about how creators practically manage responsibility work when using GenAI tools. To address this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews (N = 16) with content creators active on popular social media platforms such as YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok, examining their motivations, practices, and specific challenges related to responsible GenAI use. Our findings reveal that creators’ motivations for practicing responsible AI use span personal reputation management, audience trust-building, and broader social responsibility. However, they face persistent tensions, as integrating GenAI significantly intensifies conflicts between responsible AI practices and the pressures of visibility, engagement, and monetization imposed by platform algorithms. Content creators are required to perform extensive and often invisible responsibility work, which directly conflicts with the rapid production cycles and engagement demands of algorithm-driven platforms. Based on these insights, we propose concrete socio-technical design implications at the individual, community, and institutional levels, advocating solutions that shift responsibility beyond individual creators alone.

AI projects often fail due to financial, technical, ethical, or user acceptance challenges-failures frequently rooted in early-stage decisions.While HCI and Responsible AI (RAI) research emphasize this, practical approaches for identifying promising concepts early remain limited.Drawing on Research through Design, this paper investigates how early-stage AI concept sorting in commercial settings can reflect RAI principles.Through three design experiments-including a probe study with industry practitioners-we explored methods for evaluating risks and benefits using multidisciplinary collaboration.Participants demonstrated strong receptivity to addressing RAI concerns early in the process and effectively identified low-risk, high-benefit AI concepts.Our findings highlight the potential of a design-led approach to embed ethical and service design thinking at the front end of AI innovation.By examining how practitioners reason about AI concepts, our study invites HCI and RAI communities to see early-stage innovation as a critical space for engaging ethical and commercial considerations together.

The emergence of AI-Powered Short-Form Video Generators (ASVG) has showcased the potential to streamline production time and foster creative ideas. Despite their widespread adoption, research has underexplored ASVG, especially from creators’ perspectives. To evaluate the role of ASVG as creator-centered collaborators, we conducted mixed-method research: (1) interviews (N = 17) and (2) a participatory design workshop (N = 12) with short-form video creators. In our interviews, we investigated creators’ production process and challenges in creating short-form videos. In participatory workshops, short-form video creators envisioned AI-powered video tools, addressing their requirements and AI collaboration perceptions. Our findings indicate ASVGs can provide various advantages including inspiration, swift access to video sources, and automated highlight generation. To put things in perspective, we also underscore concerns arising from AI collaboration, including potential creator identity dilution, reduced creative output, and information bubble. We also discuss design considerations when designing ASVG to retain their creative values.