VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pravinda Sahu
dblp:303/0228
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 61% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 39% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Logical Credal Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
markov property |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Logical Credal Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning
probabilistic logic |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Logical Credal Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning
imprecise probability |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Logical Credal Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic logic · 0.6markov condition · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Logical Credal NetworksabstractWe introduce Logical Credal Networks (or LCNs for short) -- an expressive probabilistic logic that generalizes prior formalisms that combine logic and probability. Given imprecise information represented by probability bounds and conditional probability bounds on logic formulas, an LCN specifies a set of probability distributions over all its interpretations. Our approach allows propositional and first-order logic formulas with few restrictions, e.g., without requiring acyclicity. We also define a generalized Markov condition that allows us to identify implicit independence relations between atomic formulas. We evaluate our method on benchmark problems such as random networks, Mastermind games with uncertainty and credit card fraud detection. Our results show that the LCN outperforms existing approaches; its advantage lies in aggregating multiple sources of imprecise information. Radu Marinescu 0002, Haifeng Qian, Alexander G. Gray, Debarun Bhattacharjya, Francisco Barahona, Ryan Riegel, Pravinda Sahu |
NeurIPS | 8 |