Jordan Massiah

dblp:303/0490 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0009-5526-1834ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 33% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33% Efficient and distributed learning · 33%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.612022
Trans-Encoder: Unsupervised sentence-pair modelling through self- and mutual-distillations · ICLR 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
sentence pair modeling
0.612022
Trans-Encoder: Unsupervised sentence-pair modelling through self- and mutual-distillations · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › text embedding › sentence embedding
unsupervised sentence embeddings
0.612022
Trans-Encoder: Unsupervised sentence-pair modelling through self- and mutual-distillations · ICLR 2022
Information retrieval › similarity measure
semantic textual similarity
0.212022
Trans-Encoder: Unsupervised sentence-pair modelling through self- and mutual-distillations · ICLR 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-distillation · 1.1mutual distillation · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 On the Reliability of User Feedback for Evaluating the Quality of Conversational Agents
abstract
We analyse the reliability of users' explicit feedback for evaluating the quality of conversational agents. Using data from a commercial conversational system, we analyse how user feedback compares with human annotations; how well it aligns with implicit user satisfaction signals, such as retention; and how much user feedback is needed to reliably evaluate the quality of a conversational system.
Jordan Massiah, Emine Yilmaz, Yunlong Jiao, Gabriella Kazai
CIKM1
2022 Trans-Encoder: Unsupervised sentence-pair modelling through self- and mutual-distillations
Fangyu Liu 0001, Yunlong Jiao, Jordan Massiah, Emine Yilmaz, Serhii Havrylov
ICLR3