Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Justin Sanders
dblp:303/1335
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
mass spectrometry data analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A learned score function improves the power of mass spectrometry database search · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
peptide identification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A learned score function improves the power of mass spectrometry database search · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
peptide-spectrum matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A learned score function improves the power of mass spectrometry database search · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A learned score function improves the power of mass spectrometry database search · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
hi-c data analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | HiCRep.py: fast comparison of Hi-C contact matrices in Python · Bioinform. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
percolator · 0.8machine learning · 0.8de novo peptide sequencing · 0.8python implementation · 0.5HiCRep algorithm · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | A learned score function improves the power of mass spectrometry database searchabstractMOTIVATION: One of the core problems in the analysis of protein tandem mass spectrometry data is the peptide assignment problem: determining, for each observed spectrum, the peptide sequence that was responsible for generating the spectrum. Two primary classes of methods are used to solve this problem: database search and de novo peptide sequencing. State-of-the-art methods for de novo sequencing use machine learning methods, whereas most database search engines use hand-designed score functions to evaluate the quality of a match between an observed spectrum and a candidate peptide from the database. We hypothesized that machine learning models for de novo sequencing implicitly learn a score function that captures the relationship between peptides and spectra, and thus may be re-purposed as a score function for database search. Because this score function is trained from massive amounts of mass spectrometry data, it could potentially outperform existing, hand-designed database search tools. RESULTS: To test this hypothesis, we re-engineered Casanovo, which has been shown to provide state-of-the-art de novo sequencing capabilities, to assign scores to given peptide-spectrum pairs. We then evaluated the statistical power of this Casanovo score function, Casanovo-DB, to detect peptides on a benchmark of three mass spectrometry runs from three different species. In addition, we show that re-scoring with the Percolator post-processor benefits Casanovo-DB more than other score functions, further increasing the number of detected peptides. Varun Ananth, Justin Sanders, Melih Yilmaz, Sewoong Oh, William Stafford Noble |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2021 | HiCRep.py: fast comparison of Hi-C contact matrices in PythonabstractMOTIVATION: Hi-C is the most widely used assay for investigating genome-wide 3D organization of chromatin. When working with Hi-C data, it is often useful to calculate the similarity between contact matrices in order to assess experimental reproducibility or to quantify relationships among Hi-C data from related samples. The HiCRep algorithm has been widely adopted for this task, but the existing R implementation suffers from run time limitations on high-resolution Hi-C data or on large single-cell Hi-C datasets. RESULTS: We introduce a Python implementation of HiCRep and demonstrate that it is much faster and consumes much less memory than the existing R implementation. Furthermore, we give examples of HiCRep's ability to accurately distinguish replicates from non-replicates and to reveal cell type structure among collections of Hi-C data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: HiCRep.py and its documentation are available with a GPL license at https://github.com/Noble-Lab/hicrep. The software may be installed automatically using the pip package installer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Dejun Lin, Justin Sanders, William Stafford Noble |
Bioinform. | 2 |